TABLE 1
FROM:
Identifying healthcare actors involved in the adoption of information systems
Vasiliki Mantzana, Marinos Themistocleous, Zahir Irani and Vincenzo Morabito
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1. Proposed guidelines for healthcare actors identification
| Proposed guidelines for healthcare actors' identification | Proposed by | Used in the healthcare area by: |
|---|---|---|
| Principles | ||
| G1: Actors depend on the specific context and time frame | Pouloudi & Whitley (1997) | Hu et al. (2000) |
| Lapointe et al. (2002) | ||
| G2: Actors cannot be viewed in isolation | Hu et al. (2000) | |
| G3: The position of each actor may change over time | Mantzana & Themistocleous (2004) | |
| G4: Feasible options may differ from the actors' wishes | Mantzana & Themistocleous (2005) | |
| Dimensions | ||
| G5: The nature of the IS to be adopted | Lyytinen & Hirschheim (1987) | Menachemi et al. (2004) |
| G6: Internal vs external actors | Mantzana & Themistocleous (2005) | |
| G7: The type of relationship to the system | Menachemi et al. (2004) | |
| G8: Depth of impact | Menachemi et al. (2004) | |
| G9: Level of aggregation | Lapointe et al. (2002) | |
| Gagnon et al. (2004) | ||
