Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

As the development of the information society takes place worldwide, individuals, groups and organisations face the challenge of taking advantage of information and communication technologies (ICTs). ‘Digital divides’ are emerging: some sections of society are gaining access to information, knowledge and technologies while others are being excluded. There also seems to be an over-concentration on the use of ICTs for organisational purposes, with traditional information systems (IS) planning approaches largely ignoring the needs and concerns that people express outside formal organisations. One answer to this problem might be to adopt a systems approach to IS planning. At first sight this appears to be a good idea because of the aspiration of systems approaches to comprehensiveness, presumably looking beyond organisational concerns. However, a review of two popular systems methodologies employed in IS planning suggests that there is potential for their scope to be equally limited by organisational boundaries. There is a need to enhance the critical review of the boundaries of IS planning processes, enabling people to consider family, community and other concerns. In this paper, we use the systems theory of boundary critique to derive a set of questions to help practitioners reflect on different possible boundaries for IS planning exercises. These should be seen as complementary to existing systems approaches rather than as a replacement for them, enabling the latter to be practised more critically. We end by presenting our reflections on using these questions in the context of an IS planning project in a Colombian University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff R (1981) Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or to be Planned for. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afele JS (2003) Digital Bridges: Developing Countries in the Knowledge Economy. Idea Group Pub, Hershey, PA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M and Willmott H (1992) Critical theory and management studies: an introduction. In Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M and WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 1–20, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M and Willmott H (1996) Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou C (2001) The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal 11, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison D, Wood-Harper AT, Vidgen RT and Wood JRG (1998) A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2. Information Technology and People 11 (2), 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE and Wood-Harper AT (1990) Multiview: An Exploration in Information Systems Development. Alfred Waller (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company), Henley on Thames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball K and Wilson D (2000) Power, control and computer-based performance monitoring: a subjectivist approach to repertoires and resistance. Organization Studies 21 (3), 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangemann M (1994) Europe and the global information society: recommendations to the European Council. Report to the Commission, Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Brussels.

  • Bannon L (1997) Conceptualising the information society. The Economic and Social Review 28 (3), 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck E, Madon S and Sahay S (2004) On the margins of the ‘Information Society’: a comparative study of mediation. The Information Society 20, 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetts P, Wood-Harper AT and Hills S (2000) A holistic approach to the management of information systems development: a view using a soft systems approach and multiple viewpoints. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 13 (2), 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on Internet, Business and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1997) Green paper on the convergence of the telecommunications, media and information technology sectors, and the implications for regulation: towards an information society approach. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Brussels.

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Janson M and Brown A (2002) The rationality framework for a critical study of information systems. Journal of Information Technology 17, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion D and Stowell FA (2001) PEarl: a systems approach to demonstrating authenticity in information systems design. Journal of Information Technology 16, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1984) Seminar at the Department of Systems Science, City University (London, UK).

  • Checkland P (2006) Seminar at Hull University Business School, 5 April 2006, University of Hull, Hull.

  • Checkland P and Holwell S (1998) Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Poulter J (2006) Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes P (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (2005) Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Added Networks. Prentice-Hall, Harlow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968) The Systems Approach. Delacorte Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. Management Science 17, b37–b53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1971) The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1979) The Systems Approach and its Enemies. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (1994) The grassroots of IT strategy. In Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective (CIBORRA C and JELASSI T, Eds), pp 3–24, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (2001) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S (2007) Information Systems Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba JR (2002) A critical systems thinking approach for the planning of information technology in the information society. PhD Thesis, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull.

  • Córdoba JR (2006) Using Foucault to analyse ethics in the practice of problem structuring methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (9), 1027–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba JR and Midgley G (2003) Addressing organisational and societal concerns: an application of critical systems thinking to information systems planning in Colombia. In Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach (CANO J, Ed), pp 159–208, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba JR and Midgley G (2006) Broadening the boundaries: an application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (9), 1064–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOT Force (2000) Okinawa charter on global information society, declaration of the G8. Japanese Government, Okinawa, http://www.dotforce.org/reports/it1.html, February 2003.

  • Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S and Tinkler J (2006) Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earl M (1998) An organizational approach to IS strategy making. In Information Management: The Organizational Dimension (EARL M, Eds), pp 136–170, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans K (2004) Maintaining Community in the Information Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (1995) Total systems intervention (TSI): a reconstitution. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL and Jackson MC (1991a) Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL and Jackson MC (1991b) Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL and Romm N (1996) Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor R (2000) A brief crack of light? Systemic Practice and Action Research 13 (6), 757–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers R (1993) IT strategies: beyond competitive advantage. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2 (4), 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers R (1995) Re-orienting information systems strategy: integrating information systems into the business. In Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology (STOWELL F, Eds), pp 51–74, McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers R (1999) Towards the integration of e-business, knowledge management and policy considerations within an information systems strategy framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8 (3), 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers R (2004) Reflections on information systems strategizing. In The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors and Contexts (AVGEROU C, et al., Eds), pp 231–262, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1976) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action – Volumes One and Two. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn J and Duysters G (2002) External sources of innovative capabilities: the preference for strategic alliances or merges and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies 39 (2), 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M and Champy J (1995) Re-Engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brealey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins R (1995) Enhancing the user role in the development of technical standards for telecommunications. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 1, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J and Venkatraman N (1999) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Systems Journal 38 (2&3), 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R and Klein H (1989) Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM 32 (10), 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R and Klein H (1994) Realising emancipatory principles in information systems development: the case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly 18 (1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howcroft D and Wilson M (2003) Participation: ‘Bounded freedom’ or hidden constraints on user involvement. New Technology Work and Employment 18 (1), 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Information Society Commission (1999) Information society Ireland: discussion document on IT access for all. Information Society Commission, Dublin. http://www.isc.ie, accessed in March 2000.

  • Ivanov K (1991) Critical systems thinking and information technology: some summary reflections, doubts and hopes through critical thinking critically considered, and through hyper systems. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 18, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1982) The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 9, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1991) Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. Plenum, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000) Systems Approaches to Management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003a) Creative Holism: Systems Thinking for Managers. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003b) Deeper complementarism: a brief response to Ulrich. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (11), 1225–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Government (2000) First meeting of the digital opportunity task force (dotforce). G8, Okinawa. http://www.glocom.ac.jp/dotforce/TokyoPlen.doc, accessed on the 14 January 2002.

  • Jasperson JS, Carte T, Saunders CS, Butler BS, Croes HJP and Zheng W (2002) Power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly 26 (4), 397–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermier J (1998) Introduction: critical perspectives on organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (2), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW (1991) Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein H and Huynh MQ (2004) The critical social theory of Jurgen Habermas and its implications for IS research. In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (MINGERS J and WILLCOCKS L, Eds), pp 157–237, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein H and Lyytinen K (1985) The poverty of scientism in information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems: Proceedings of the IFIP 8.2 Colloquium (MUMFORD E, Ed), pp 131–161, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P (1994) Information Systems Development: Systems Thinking in the Field of Information Systems. Pitman Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone H (1999) Decision Making for Technology Executives: Using Multiple Perspectives to Improve Performance. Artech House, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K (1992) Information systems and critical theory. In Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M and WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 159–180, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K and Klein HK (1985) The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems (MUMFORD E, Ed), pp 219–236, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell R (2002) Inside The Communication Revolution: Evolving Patterns of Social and Technical Interaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell R and Steinmueller W (2000) Mobilizing the Information Society: Strategies for Growth and Opportunity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart A (2003) The Information Society: An Introduction. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies H (1996) Whose Brave New World? The Information Highway and the New Economy. Between the Lines, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1992) The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. Systems Practice 5, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1996) What is this thing called CST?. In Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice (FLOOD RL and ROMM N, Eds), pp 11–24, Plenum Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1997) Mixing methods: developing systemic intervention. In Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies (MINGERS J and GILL A, Eds), pp 249–290, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2003) Introduction and overview of systems thinking. In Systems thinking volume 1 General systems theory, cybernetics and complexity (MIDGLEY G, Eds), pp xvii–liii, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G and Ochoa-Arias A (2004) An introduction to community operational research. In Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development (MIDGLEY G and OCHOA-ARIAS A, Eds), pp 1–36, Plenum, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Munlo I and Brown M (1998) The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 7, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1984) Subjectivism and soft systems methodology: a critique. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 11, 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1992) Technical, practical and critical OR: past, present and future?. In Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M and WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 90–112, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12 (3), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2005) ‘More dangerous than an unanswered question is an unquestioned answer’: a contribution to the Ulrich debate. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (4), 468–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Brocklesby J (1996) Multimethodology: towards a framework for critical pluralism. Systemist 18, 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (1983) Designing Human Systems for New Technology: The ETHICS Method. Manchester Business School, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro I (1999) Man-machine systems: people and technology in OR. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12, 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte N (1995) Being Digital. MIT Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTIA (1999) Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/, February 2000.

  • Ormerod R (1996) Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's supermarket using ‘soft’ OR”. Interfaces 16 (1), 102–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod R (2005) Putting soft OR methods to work: the case of IS strategy development for the UK Parliament. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (12), 1379–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidis P and Edwards J (2001) Organisational learning – a critical systems thinking discipline. European Journal of Information Systems 10 (3), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J and Ward J (2004) Beyond strategic systems: towards an IS capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (2), 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman M (1998) Class Warfare in the Information Age. Macmillan Press Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli G and Ives B (2005) IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29 (4), 747–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reponen T (1998) The role of learning in information systems planning and implementation. In Information Technology and Organisational Transformation (GALLIERS RD and BAETS WRJ, Eds), pp 133–149, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey D and Boudreau M (1999) Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research 10 (2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal R, Hirschheim R and Goles T (2001) The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science 12 (2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela H, Lederer A, Reponen T (2000) Information systems planning in a turbulent environment. European Journal of Information Systems 9 (1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam R and Hartono E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 125–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter D (1991) Critical systems thinking: a connective summary. In Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings (FLOOD RL and JACKSON MC, Eds), pp 213–226, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell F (1995) Empowering the client: the relevance of SSM and interpretivism in client-led design. In Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology (STOWELL F, Eds), pp 118–139, McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos S and Basden A (2006) In Search of an Integrative Vision for Technology: Interdisciplinary Studies in Information Systems. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J and Moynihan E (2002) Analysing IT ethics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1983) Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1987) Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational Research 31, 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1993) Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: a plea for critical holism. Systems Practice 6 (6), 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1996) Critical systems thinking for citizens: a research proposal. Research Memorandum, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

  • Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice 1, 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2001) Critically systemic discourse: a discursive approach to reflective practice in ISD (part 2). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 3 (3), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2003) Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (4), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1992) Science and Technology in Developing Countries: Strategies for the 1990's. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.

  • Walsham G (2001) Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward J and Griffiths P (2002) Strategic Planning for Information Systems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster F (2002) Theories of the Information Society. Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox D and Pearl M (2002) Civic and community technology. The Journal of The Communications Network 1 (1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott H (1993) Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies 30 (4), 515–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott H (1997) Management and organization studies as science? Organization 4 (3), 309–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B (1984) Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B (2002) Soft Systems Methodology: Conceptual Model and its Contribution. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Harper AT, Corder S, Wood JG and Watson H (1996) How we profess: the ethical systems analyst. Communications of the ACM 39 (3), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wresch W (1996) Disconnected: Have and Have-nots in the Information Age. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Heinemann Professional, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José-Rodrigo Córdoba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Córdoba, JR., Midgley, G. Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning. Eur J Inf Syst 17, 125–142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.4

Keywords

Navigation