Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of workspace awareness on group intellective decision effectiveness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Workspace awareness is an understanding of members’ interactions within a shared workspace, and has been a fundamental concern to researchers examining how groups using group support systems can be more effective as they design and develop physical artifacts. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that workspace awareness can be a significant factor influencing the effectiveness of groups employing group support systems for the development of intangible artifacts, such as decision quality and consensus. The workspace awareness literature typically does not examine causal relationships within awareness. We develop a theoretical model that divides workspace awareness into three elements (presence, behavior, and insight awareness), which are important for group decision tasks, and provide empirical evidence that: (1) understanding the reasons behind group member behaviors (insight awareness) is key to increasing decision quality and consensus; (2) greater insight awareness can be obtained when an individual is better able to track and characterize others’ behaviors (behavior awareness); and (3) behavior awareness depends on an individual's ability to identify and distinguish among the different individuals within the group (presence awareness). Empirical support is derived from a laboratory experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baecker RM, Nastos D, Posner IR and Mawby KL (1993) The User-Centered Iterative Design of Collaborative Writing Software. InterCHI, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP and Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassili JN (1993) Procedural efficiency and the spontaneity of trait inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (2), 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassili JN and Racine JP (1990) On the process relationship between person and situation judgments in attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (5), 881–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman MH and Carroll J (1987) Negotiator cognition. In Research in Organizational Behavior (STAW BM and CUMMINGS LL, Eds), pp 247–288, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettenhausen KL (1991) Five years of group research: what we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management 17, 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bønes E, Hasvold P, Henriksen E and Strandenæs T (2007) Risk analysis of information security in a mobile instant messaging and presence system for healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76 (9), 677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner BL, Baumann MR, Lehn AK and Wheeler EC (2006) Modeling collective choice: decision making on complex intellective tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology 36, 617–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush TA (1998) Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development 46, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: a review and analysis. Academy of Management Review 13 (1), 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlston DE and Skowronski JJ (1994) Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (5), 840–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines E and Zeller R (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castore CH and Murnighan KJ (1978) Determinants of support for group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram L (1996) Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly 20 (2), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (MARCOULIDES GA, Ed.), pp 295–336, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW, Marcolin BL and Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clary EG and Tesser A (1983) Reactions to unexpected events: the naive scientist and interpretive activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 (4), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly T, Jessup LM and Valacich JS (1990) Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science 36 (6), 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH and McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis AR (1996) Information exchange and use in group decision making: you can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Quarterly 20 (4), 433–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis GL and Gallupe B (1987) A foundation for the study of group support systems. Management Science 33 (5), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamadis ET and Polyzos GC (2004) Efficient cooperative searching on the web: system design and evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 61 (5), 699–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G and Beale R (1993) Human–Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donellon A, Gray B and Bougon MG (1986) Communication, meaning, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P and Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In CSCW ’92: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, pp 107–114, ACM Press.

  • Drury J and Williams MG (2002) A framework for role-based specification and evaluation of awareness support in synchronous collaborative applications. In Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp 12–17.

  • Dubinsky AJ, Skinner SJ and Whittler TE (1989) Evaluating sales personnel: an attribution theory perspective. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 9 (1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson DJ and Krull DS (1999) Distinguishing judgments about what from judgments about why: effects of behavior extremity on correspondent inferences and causal attributions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 21 (1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk RF and Miller NB (1992) A Primer for Soft Modeling. University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferscha A (2001) Integrating pervasive information acquisition to enhance workspace awareness. In Proceedings of the Ninth EuroMicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing, pp 327–336.

  • Fjermestad J and Hiltz SR (1998) An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (3), 7–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C and Larker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (4), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC, Roeder D and Mulholland RR (1979) Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social Networks 2, 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver WW (1991) Sound support for collaboration. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work, pp 293–308.

  • Gopal A and Prasad P (2000) Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: shifting the focus from technology to interaction. MIS Quarterly 24 (3), 509–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether DM and Plott CR (1979) Economic theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. The American Economic Review 69 (4), 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetzkow H and Simon HA (1955) The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Management Science 1, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin C and Greenberg S (1996) Workspace awareness for groupware. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 208–209, Vancouver.

  • Gutwin C and Greenberg S (2002) A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11, 411–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin C, Stark G and Greenberg S (1995) Support for workspace awareness in educational groupware. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL’95), pp 147–156, ACM.

  • Harvey JH and Weary G (1984) Current issues in attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology 35, 427–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie R (1984) Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1), 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayne SC, Pollard CE and Rice RE (2003) Identification of comment authorship in anonymous group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1), 301–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath C and Luff P (1992) Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1 (1/2), 69–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton DJ, Smith RH and Kin SH (1995) Processes of causal explanation and dispositional attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (3), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP (1990) A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review 15 (1), 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland JS (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 20, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysman M, Steinfield C, Jang CY, David K, Huis in ’t Veld M, Poot J and Mulder I (2003) Virtual teams and the appropriation of communication technology: exploring the concept of media stickiness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12 (4), 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K and Leidner DE (1998) Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (4), 9–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahai SS and Cooper RB (1999) The effect of computer-mediated communication on agreement and acceptance. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (1), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa S (1992) Outcome or expectancy? Antecedent of spontaneous causal attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (6), 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (LEVINE D, Ed.), University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon S and Weingart LR (2004) Unilateral concessions from the other party: concession behavior, attributions, and negotiation judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin PR (1980) Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In Progress in Social Psychology, pp 127–155, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

  • Leavitt HJ (1951) Some effect of certain communications patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Shi Y and Xu G (2001) Supporting group awareness in collaborative design. In The Sixth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp 36–40.

  • Lord RG and Smith JE (1983) Theoretical, information processing, and situational factors affecting attribution theory models of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review 8 (1), 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Bernard RM and Abrami PC (2006) Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: a theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development 54 (2), 141–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupfer M, Cohen R, Bernard JL, Smalley D and Schippmann J (1985) An attribution analysis of jurors’ judgments in civil cases. Journal of Social Psychology 125 (6), 743–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML (1994) Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science 5 (4), 502–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens R, Bastiaens T and Kirschner PA (2007) New learning design in distance education: the impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education 28 (1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes T (2001) Learning technology and learning relationships. In Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies (STEPHENSON J, Ed.), pp 16–26, Kogan Page, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JE and Hollingshead AB (1994) Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues, and an Agenda. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod PL (1997) A comprehensive model of anonymity in computer-supported group decision making. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp 223–234.

  • McLeod PL (2000) Anonymity and consensus in computer-supported group decision making. Research on Managing Groups and Teams 3, 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLinden M, McCall S, Hinton D and Weston A (2006) Participation in online problem-based learning: insights from postgraduate teachers studying through open and distance education. Distance Education 27 (3), 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Chapa S, Romero-Salcedo M and Oktaba H (2000) Group awareness support in collaborative writing systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Groupware, pp 112–118.

  • Mizerski RW, Golden LL and Kernan JB (1979) The attribution process in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 6 (2), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1976) Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter D and Boldyreff C (2003) Historical awareness support and its evaluation in collaborative software engineering. In Proceedings of the Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp 1–6.

  • Oemig C and Gross T (2007) Shifts in significance: how group dynamics improves group awareness. In Mensch & Computer 2007: 7. Fachübergreifende Konferenz fuer interaktive und kooperative Menien.

  • Pinsonneault A and Heppel N (1997) Anonymity in group support systems research: a new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (3), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes T and Lea M (2000) Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics 43 (8), 1252–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes T, Spears R and Lea M (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries: side-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25 (6), 689–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SV and Jarvenpaa SL (1991) Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research. Management Science 37 (10), 1347–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemer K, Klein S and Flöler F (2007) Towards a practice understanding of the creation of awareness in distributed work. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Conference on Information Systems.

  • Robinson M (1992) Computer-supported cooperative work: cases and concepts. In Readings in GroupWare and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human–Human Collaboration (BAECKER RM, Ed.), pp 29–49, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Salcedo M, Osuna-Gómez CA, Sheremetov L, Villa L, Morales C, Rocha L and Chi M (2004) Study and analysis of workspace awareness in CDebate: a groupware application for collaborative debates. Interacting with Computers 16 (4), 657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross L (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (BERKOWITZ L, Ed.), pp 173–220, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1988) Laboratory experimentation in economics: a methodological overview. Economic Journal 98 (393), 974–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury WD, Chin WW, Gopal A and Newsted PR (2002) Research report: better theory through measurement – developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation. Information Systems Research 13 (1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador T, Scholtz J and Larson J (1996) The Denver model for groupware design. SIGCHI Bulletin 28 (1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma A, Noroozi Z and van der Hoek A (2003) Palantír: raising awareness among configuration management workspaces. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 444–454.

  • Segal L (1994) Effects of checklist interface on non-verbal crew communications. Contractor Report 177639, NASA Ames Research Center.

  • Shepherd MM, Briggs RO, Reinig BA, Yen J and Nunamaker JF (1996) Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: beyond anonymity. Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (3), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short J, Williams E and Christie B (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P and Lichtenstein S (1983) Preference reversals: a broader perspective. The American Economic Review 73 (4), 596–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale S and Greenberg S (2005) Broadcasting information via display names in instant messaging. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp 89–98.

  • Smith ER and Miller FD (1983) Mediation among attributional inferences and comprehension processes: initial findings and a general method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (3), 492–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VL (1982) Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review 72 (5), 923–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears R and Lea M (1992) Social influence and the influence of the ‘social’ in computer-mediated communication. In Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (LEA M, Ed.), pp 30–65, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield C, Huysman M, David K, Jang CY, Poot J, Huis in ’t Veld M, Mulder I, Goodman E, Lloyd J, Hinds T, Andriessen E, Jarvis K, van der Werff K and Cabrera A (2001) New methods for studying global virtual teams: towards a multi-faceted approach. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1–10.

  • Steinfield C, Jang CY and Pfaff B (1999) Supporting virtual team collaboration: the TeamSCOPE system. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp 81–90.

  • Tversky A and Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich JS, Dennis AR and Connolly T (1994) Idea generation in computer-based groups – a new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57 (3), 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich JS, Jessup LM, Dennis AR and Nunamaker Jr. JF (1992) A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation 1, 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertegaal R, Velichkovsky B and van der Veer G (1997) Catching the eye: management of joint attention in cooperative work. SIGCHI Bulletin 29 (4), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research 19 (1), 52–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (1996) Computer mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 (1), 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ST and De Silveira Jr. LG (2002) Workspace awareness in relaxed WYSIWIS systems. In Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, pp 171–178.

  • Zander A (1982) Making Groups Effective. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigurs I and Buckland B (1998) A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly 22 (3), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bauer College of Business Administration, University of Houston, Houston, TX, U.S.A.

    Randolph B Cooper

  2. Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, College of Business and Public Administration, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, U.S.A.

    Russell Haines

Authors
  1. Randolph B Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Russell Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph B Cooper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, R., Haines, R. The Influence of workspace awareness on group intellective decision effectiveness. Eur J Inf Syst 17, 631–648 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.51

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.51

Keywords

Search

Navigation