Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding web site redesigns in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): a U.K.-based study on the applicability of e-commerce Stage Models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Despite the efforts of governments and the various support programmes, achievement of advanced stages of e-commerce by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is still very low. There have been some attempts to study the dynamic nature of websites, but there is still little research evidence to explain why and how SMEs evolve their web presence. This paper aims to develop a comprehensive classification of drivers for web site redesign based on interviews with various members of staff from SMEs in the U.K. that have recently redesigned their web sites. A sequential mixed-methodological analysis, involving the use of qualitative and quantitative data analysis, was used to develop the classification. This enabled the development of a framework that classified seven main categories of drivers for web site redesign. The drivers identified were: changing business requirements, evolving internet strategies, addressing user needs, maintenance, changing technology, pressure from peers/competitors, and the influence of developers. However, only the first four were found to be significant in the study. The categorisation and the findings suggest a number of key determinants not explicitly addressed by other work. In addition, the findings provide little support for the staged approach to e-commerce progression as few companies reported the implementation of sophisticated internet technology features as a main reason for their web site redesigns. The contributions of this paper are firstly, to provide an instrument to the academic and practitioner communities interested in the topic of web site evolution. Secondly, the categorisation of drivers for redesign and the individual reasons found in this study are expected to provide assistance to SME managers to justify, plan and strategise internet investments realistically and effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert TC, Goes PB and Gupta A (2004) GIST: a model for design and management of content and interactivity of customer-centric web sites. MIS Quarterly 28 (2), 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Mendo F and Fitzgerald G (2005) Theoretical approaches to study SMEs eBusiness progression. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 13 (2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash C and Burn J (2003) Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (4), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bampton R and Cowton C (2002) The e-interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal] 3(2). [WWW document] http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm.

  • Beckinsale M and Ram M (2006) Delivering ICT to ethnic minority businesses: an action-research approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24, 847–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Dexter AS, Drury DH and Goldstein RC (1984) A critique of stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Communications of the ACM 27 (5), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbunan-Fich R and Altschuller S (2005) Web presence transformations in the 1990s: an analysis of press releases. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48 (2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BERR (Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) (2007) Small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) statistics for the UK 2006 press release, 22 August. [WWW document] http://stats.berr.gov.uk/ed/sme/smestats2006-ukspr.pdf (accessed 30 September 2007).

  • Boudreau MC and Robey D (1999) Organisational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, (DE, P and DEGROSS JI, Eds) Charlotte, NC.

  • Brown DH and Lockett N (2004) Potential of critical e-applications for engaging SMEs in e-business: a provider perspective. European Journal of Information Systems 13 (1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess S, Sellitto C. and Wenn A. (2005) Maturity in the websites of Australian wineries: a study of varying website content. International Journal of Electronic Business 3 (5), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr M (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review 81 (5), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI and KPMG Consulting (2002) Reality Bites – The Second Annual Report on E-business in the UK. CBI Publications, London, UK.

  • Chaston I, Badger B, Mangles T and Sadler-Smith E (2001) The internet and e-commerce: an opportunity to examine organisational learning in progress in small manufacturing firms? International Small Business Journal 19 (2), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau S (2003) The use of e-commerce amongst thirty-four Australian SMEs: an experiment or a strategic business tool? Journal of Systems and Information Technology 7 (1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikofsky EJ (1999) Aspects to consider for understanding web site evolution. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Web Site Evolution (WSE), (SCOTT TILLEY, Ed) Atlanta, GA.

  • Creswell J (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie W (2000) The Global Information Society. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J and Scheepers R (2000) Managing the crises in intranet implementation: a stage model. Information Systems Journal 10 (2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel E, Wilson H and Myers A (2002) Adoption of e-commerce by SMEs in the UK: towards a stage model. International Small Business Journal 20 (3), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dans E (2004) IT does matter. European Business Forum (EBF) 16 [WWW document] www.EBFonline.com.

  • Davidson AP, Burgess S and Sellitto C (2006) An investigation of SMTE web site usage in Australia: implications for e-commerce adoption and planning processes. In Global Electronic Business Research: Opportunities and Directions (AL-QIRIM NAY, Ed), pp 88–113, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CH and Vladica F (2006) The value of internet technologies and e-business solutions to microenterprises in Atlantic Canada. In E-Commerce and V-Business: Digital Enterprise in the Twenty-First Century (BARNESSJ, Ed), 2nd edn, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio PJ and Powell WW (1991) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis (POWELL WW and DIMAGGIO PJ, Eds), pp 63–83, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon T, Thompson B and Mcallister P (2002) The value of ICT for SMEs in the UK: a critical review of literature. Report for the Small Business Service Research Programme, The College of Estate Management, Reading.

  • Drew S (2003) Strategic uses of ecommerce by SMEs in the east of England. European Management Journal 21 (1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) (2003) Business in the Information Age – International Benchmarking Study. Booz Allen Hamilton, London, UK.

  • EU Commission (2003) Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises. Official Journal of the European Union L 124, 36–41.

  • Fillis I, Johansson U and Wagner B (2004) A qualitative investigation of smaller firm e-business development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 (3), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald G, Papazafeiropoulou A, Piris L and Serrano A (2005) Organizational perceptions of e-commerce: re-assessing the benefits. Electronic Markets 15 (3), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folinas D, Manthou V, Sigala M and Vlachopoulou M (2004) E-volution of a supply chain: cases and best practices. Internet Research 14 (4), 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FrøkjÆr E and HornbÆk K (2004) Usability inspection by metaphors of human thinking compared to heuristic evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17 (3), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengatharen D, Standing C and Burn J (2005) Government-supported community portal regional e-marketplaces for SMEs: evidence to support a staged approach. Electronic Markets 15 (4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginige A and Murugesan S (2001) Guest editors’ introduction: web engineering – an introduction. IEEE Multimedia 1 (8), 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P (2002) Toward a model of growth stages for knowledge management technology in law firms. Informing Science 5 (2), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti O (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Don Mills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman M and Miles MB (1984) Innovation Up Close: How School Improvement Works. Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalakota R and Robinson M (1999) E-Business: Roadmap for Success. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • King JL and Kraemer KL (1984) Evolution and organisational information systems: an assessment of Nolan's stage model. Communications of the ACM 27 (5), 466–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirda E, Jazayeri M, Kerer C and Schranz M (2001) Experiences in engineering flexible web services. IEEE Multimedia 8 (1), 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK and Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Consulting (1999) Electronic Commerce Research Report. KPMG Consulting, London, UK.

  • Lang M (2001) A study of practice in hypermedia systems design. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), (SMITHSON S, GRICAR J, PODLOGAR M and AVGERINOU S, Eds) Bled, Slovenia.

  • Layne K and Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18, 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenburg NM (2005) Does size matter? Small firms’ use of e-business tools in the supply chain. Electronic Markets 15 (2), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M and Powell P (2003) Exploring SME internet adoption: towards a contingent model. Electronic Markets 13 (2), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Borough of Newham (2005) London SMEs and local authority e-procurement: risk or opportunity? - Newham KickStart Project Director's Report. London, UK. [WWW document] http://www.imaginist.co.uk/documents/13SeptKickStartReport.pdf.

  • Lowe D (1999) Web engineering or web gardening. WebNet Journal 1 (1), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K (1991) Penetration of information technology in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 3, 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis S (1998) Site redesigns keep it simple … and don’t do it too often. Computerworld 32 (11), 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin LM and Matlay H (2001) Blanket’ approaches to promoting ICT in small firms: some lessons from the DTI ladder adoption model in the UK. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11 (5), 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor RC and Vrazalic L (2005) A basic model of electronic commerce adoption barriers. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 12 (4), 510–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean R and Blackie NM (2004) Customer and company voices in eCommerce: a qualitative analysis. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 7 (4), 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroño-Cerdan AL and Soto-Acosta P (2007) External web content and its influence on organizational performance. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (1), 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB and Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr M (1982) Explaining Organisational Behavior. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J and Tahir M (2002) Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. New Riders, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan RL (1973) Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Communications of the ACM 16 (7), 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ and Teddlie C (2003) A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (TASHAKKORI A and TEDDLIE C, Eds), pp 351–383, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavic S, Koh SCL, Simpson M and Padmore J (2007) Could e-business create a competitive advantage in UK SMEs? Benchmarking: An International Journal 14 (3), 320–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli G, Brohman MK, Watson RT and Parasuraman A (2004) Net-based customer service systems: evolution and revolution in web site functionalities. Decisions Sciences 35 (3), 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon S and Swatman PMC (1999) An exploratory study of small business internet commerce issues. Information & Management 35 (1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2001) Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review 79 (3), 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman RS (2000) What a tangled web we weave. IEEE Software 17 (1), 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramlet S (2001) Know when it's time to overhaul. Law Practice Management 27 (6). [www document] http://www.abanet.org/lpm/magazine.

  • Rao SS, Metts G and Mora Monge CA (2003) Electronic commerce development in small and medium sized enterprises: a stage model and its implications. Business Process Management 9 (1), 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi D, Williams B, Money A and Swartz E (1998) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method. Sage, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan T, Field RHG and Olfman L (2006) Discontinuous change in university web sites: the relative importance of reasons for change. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations 1, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal R and Robey D (1995) Reconciling variance and process strategies for studying information systems development. Information Systems Research 6 (4), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M (2001) Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health 24, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organisations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson M and Docherty A (2004) E-commerce adoption support and advice for UK SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 (3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale R and Standing C (2004) Benefits and barriers of electronic marketplace participation: an SME perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17 (4), 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (1998) Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M and Murphy A (2004) SMEs and e-business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11 (3), 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo TSH and Pian Y (2003) A contingency perspective on internet adoption and competitive advantage. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (2), 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban E, King D, Lee J, Warkentin M and Chung HM (2002) Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH and Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. John Wiley & sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE and Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter SJ, Saunders C and Hart P (2003) Electronic window dressing: impression management with web sites. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (4), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2nd edn, Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Caldwell N, Harland C, Powell P, Woerndl M and Xu S (2004) Small firms and e-business: cautiousness, contingency, and cost-benefit. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management 10, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwass V (1996) Electronic commerce: structures and issues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Resources Division, The Open University, U.K.

    Fernando Alonso-Mendo

  2. Department of Information Systems & Computing, Brunel University, U.K.

    Guy Fitzgerald & Enrique Frias-Martinez

Authors
  1. Fernando Alonso-Mendo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guy Fitzgerald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enrique Frias-Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy Fitzgerald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonso-Mendo, F., Fitzgerald, G. & Frias-Martinez, E. Understanding web site redesigns in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): a U.K.-based study on the applicability of e-commerce Stage Models. Eur J Inf Syst 18, 264–279 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.14

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.14

Keywords

Search

Navigation