Skip to main content
Log in

Factors considered when outsourcing an IS system: an empirical examination of the impacts of organizational size, strategy and the object of a decision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

As IT expenditures have been growing over the last few years, organizations have started to scrutinize them more closely and some are deciding to outsource parts of their Information Systems (IS) operations. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research on the impact that the object of an outsourcing decision may have on the factors considered when making such a decision. The impact of organizational size and the firm's strategy has also not been conclusively established in the literature. This paper examines and compares the different supplier, internal, technology and cost factors considered when outsourcing Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) or Decision Support Systems (DSSs) (the object of a decision). It also examines the divergent decision factors for large, medium and small organizations, and the competitive strategy's impact on the factors that are considered. The paper is based on a study with samples from four large SAP Conferences and includes 1889 individuals working in organizations that use enterprise resource planning software. This research found that the object being outsourced, the firm's competitive strategies, and the organizational size are factors that significantly influence the outsourcing decision process. We found that the relative importance of decision factors for the outsourcing of OLTP is significantly different from those for a DSS and that, where the outsourcing object is of strategic importance, there is a closer attention to internal factors. Our findings confirm that outsourcing strategies are aligned with organizational strategies. For example, cost factors dominate in the outsourcing decision among organizations that employ a low-costs strategy as compared to those following a differentiation or niche strategy. Also, compared to firms pursuing other competitive strategies, for the outsourcing of DSS, differentiators place a significantly higher emphasis on supplier factors. Regarding the role of company size, we found significant differences in the importance given to supplier, internal, technology, and cost factors by organizations of different sizes. For example, compared to smaller organizations, larger organizations gave less importance to supplier and technology factors and more importance to cost factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpar P and Saharia AN (1995) Outsourcing information system functions: an organization economics perspective. Journal or Organizational Computing 5 (3), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang S and Cummings LL (1997) Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organizational Science 8 (3), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang S and Straub DW (1998) Production and transaction economies and is outsourcing: a study of us banking industry. MIS Quarterly 22 (4), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apte UM and Mason RO (1995) Global disaggregation of information intensive services. Management Science 41 (7), 1250–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett KP and Jones MC (1994) Firms that choose outsourcing: a profile. Information and Management 26 (4), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahli B and Rivard S (2003) A validation of measures associated with the risk factors in Information Technology Outsourcing. HICCS, Vol. 8, pp 269a. International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), 36th Annual Hawaii.

  • Brown D and Wilson S (2005) The Black Book of Outsourcing: How to Manage the Changes, Challenges and Opportunities, Wiley, John & Sons, Inc., Chichester, England, p 384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Malone T, Gurbaxani V and Kambil A (1994) Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science 40 (12), 1628–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalambos LI and Nakatsu R (2008) A risk profile of offshore-outsourced development projects. Communications of the ACM 51 (6), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk J and Sharp J (1995) A framework for deciding what to outsource in information technology. Journal of Information Technology 10, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie WL and Wilcox LP (1998) Analyzing four types of IT outsourcing in the context of scale, client/supplier interdependency, and risk mitigation. Information Systems Journal 8 (2), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern J, Goles T, Hirschheim. R and Bandula J (2004) Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 35 (4), 6–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djavanshir GR (2005) Surveying the risks and benefits of IT outsourcing. IT Professional 7 (6), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl MJ (1996) The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review 37 (3), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart KM and Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune (2006) The Fortune-1000 list of the largest companies. April 18.

  • Gable GG (1996) Outsourcing IT advice: a success prediction model. Proceedings of the Information Systems Conference of New Zealand, 30–31 October 1996. pp 143–153, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable GG and Sharp JA (1992) Outsourcing assistance with computer system selection: a success factors model. IEEE Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference System Sciences 3, 566–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan W (2006) Analysis on the costs of IT-outsourcing. In IEEE Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI '06), Shanghai, China, 1–3 June 2006, IEEE, 785–789.

  • Gartner (2008) Dataquest insight: IT markets remain resilient in 2008 and will grow moderately in the next three to five years. Gartner Research.

  • Gonzalez R, Gasco J and Liopis J (2005) Information systems outsourcing risks: a study of large firms. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105 (1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Cheon MJ and Teng JTC (1994a) An evaluation of the impact of corporate strategy and the role of information technology on IS functional outsourcing. European Journal of Information Systems 3 (3), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Cheon MJ and Teng JTC (1994b) A descriptive study on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Information & Management 27 (1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancox M and Hackney R (1999) Information technology outsourcing: conceptualizing practice in the public and private sector. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5–8 January 1999, p 7067, Maui, HI, USA.

  • Lacity M, Wilcox P and Feeny D (1996) The value of selective IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review 37 (3), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance G and Williams T (1967) A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies: II. Computer Journal 10, 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levina N and Ross J (2003) Vendor's perspectives: exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 331–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y and Zumbo B (2007) The impact of outliers on Cronbach's coefficient alpha estimate of reliability: visual analogue scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 67, 620–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh L and Venkatraman N (1992) Determinants of information technology outsourcing: a cross sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 9 (1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland FW and Nolan RL (1995) How to manage an IS outsourcing alliance. Sloan Management Review 36 (2), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S and Chaya AK (1996) Analyzing cost effectiveness of organizations: the impact of it spending. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (2), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojsilović A, Ray B, Lawrence R and Takriti S (2007) A logistic regression framework for information technology outsourcing lifecycle management. Computers & Operations Research 34 (12), 3609–3627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam K, Rajagopalan S, Rao HR and Chaudhry A (1996) A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing. Communications of the ACM 39 (7), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palvia PC (1995) A dialectic view of information systems outsourcing: pros and cons. Information and Management 29 (11), 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage. Free Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1998) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York, 1st P edn.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK and Hamel G (1990) The core competencies of the organization. Harvard Business Review 68 (3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1960) The New Science of Management Decisions. Harper and Row, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slaugther SA and Ang S (1996) Employment outsourcing in information systems. Communications of the ACM 39 (7), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Mitra SA and Narasimhan S (1998) Information systems outsourcing: a study of pre-event firm characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (2), 61–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol MG and Apte UM (1995) Domestic and global outsourcing practices of America's most effective IS users. Journal of Information Technology 10, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark J, Arlt M and Walker DHT (2006) Outsourcing decisions and models – some practical considerations for large organizations. International Conference on Global Software Engineering, 2006. ICGSE '06, p. 12–17.

  • Teng JTC, Cheon MJ and Grover V (1995) Decisions to outsource information systems functions: testing a strategy-theoretic discrepancy model. Decision Sciences 26 (1), 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIS Publishing 2007 Who is attending. http://www.sapprojects2007.com/overview/who.cfm (accessed 25 September 2007).

  • Wullenweber K and Weitzel T (2007) An empirical exploration of how process standardization reduces outsourcing risks. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p 240c.

  • Wang J-J and Yang D (2007) Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research 34 (12), 3691–3700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao F and Hongli L (2007) Information systems outsourcing vendor selection based on analytic hierarchy process. Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference 21–25 September, pp 6250–6253.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix A: Strategy classification questions

Appendix A: Strategy classification questions

Please indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with these statements.

My organization competes primarily by providing different products/services than our competitors.

My organization competes primarily by providing lower cost products/services than our competitors.

My organization competes primarily as a specialized provider of products/services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, B., Stylianou, A. Factors considered when outsourcing an IS system: an empirical examination of the impacts of organizational size, strategy and the object of a decision. Eur J Inf Syst 18, 235–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.18

Keywords

Navigation