Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Retaining women in the U.S. IT workforce: theorizing the influence of organizational factors

  • Special Section Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

The challenge of meeting the demand for information technology (IT) workers is addressed by examining three important organizational factors that affect women's retention in the IT field. Much of the research on gender and IT assumes a unilateral effect: all organizational factors affect all women in the same ways. An alternative view that is explored in this research is that within-gender differences offer rich insights into the gender imbalance in the IT profession. The individual differences theory of gender and IT enabled us to examine variation in organizational influences on women through analysis of transcripts from in-depth interviews conducted with 92 women in the IT workforce in the U.S.A. The results show that three organizational factors – work–life balance, organizational climate, and mentoring – affected the women's career development in a range of ways. Our findings shed new light on what has been interpreted by other researchers as contradictory findings because our theoretical starting point is the assumption that women are not all the same, that within-gender variation is expected and that it provides an opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of gender relations in the IT field. Using this theory we were able to identify opportunities for the development of interventions by linking the themes embedded in the three workplace factors to the constructs of the theory. The individual identity construct revealed the ways in which a woman's demographic and professional characteristics affect her career choices. The individual influences construct focused attention on the ways in which differences in personality, abilities, and influential people shape one's career. Finally, the environmental influences construct characterized contextual influences on women's participation in the IT profession. Our findings show that both research and interventions directed at increasing the retention of women must be flexible enough to respond to the variation that exists among women and within IT workplaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam A, Howcroft D and Richardson H (2002) Guest editorial. Information Technology and People 15 (2), 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam A, Howcroft D and Richardson H (2004) A decade of neglect: reflections on gender and IS. New Technology, Work and Employment 19 (3), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adya M and Kaiser KM (2005) Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: a model of girls’ career choices. Information Technology & People 18 (3), 230–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adya MP (2008) Women at work: differences in IT career experiences and perceptions between South Asian and American women. Human Resources Management 47 (3), 601–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agar MH (1986) Speaking of Ethnography. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja M (2002) Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems 11, 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen MW, Armstrong DJ, Riemenschneider CK and Reid MF (2006) Making sense of the barriers women face in the information technology workforce: standpoint theory, self-disclosure, and causal maps. Sex Roles 54, 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TD and Eby LT (2004) Factors related to mentor reports of mentoring functions provided: gender and relational characteristics. Sex Roles 50 (1–2), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DJ, Riemenschneider CK, Reid M and Allen M (2007) Advancement, voluntary turnover and women in IT: a cognitive study of work-family conflict. Information and Management 44 (2), 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroudi J and Igbaria M (1994) An examination of gender effects on career success of information systems employees. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (3), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett M (1987) The concept of ‘Difference’. Feminist Review 26 (Summer), 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A (1997) Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory and Cultural Forms. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2006) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Dunnette MD, Lawler EE and Weick KE (1970) Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke VA and Teague GJ (1994a) Encouraging girls to study computer science – should we even try? Australian Educational Computing 9 (1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke VA and Teague GJ (1994b) A psychological perspective on gender differences in computing participation. In The Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE 1994 Conference pp 258–262, ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane S (1996) Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equity. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs JM and Tolbert EL (1980) Vocational role models of college women. Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors 43 (1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cougar JD (1988) Motivators vs demotivators in the IS environment. Journal of Systems Management 39 (6), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cougar JD and Zawacki RA (1980) Motivating and Managing Computer Personnel. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook CW, Crepeau RG and McMurtrey ME (1991) Utilization of the career anchor/career orientation constructs for management of I/S professionals. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research pp 12–23, ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling N, Bogat GA, Cavell TA, Murphy SE and Sánchez B (2006) Gender, ethnicity, development, and risk: mentoring and the consideration of individual differences. Journal of Community Psychology 34 (6), 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCecco JP and Elia JP (1993) A critique and synthesis of biological essentialism and social constructionist views of sexuality and gender. Journal of Homosexuality 24 (3/4), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison DR (1996) What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review 21 (3), 619–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries J, Webb C and Eveline J (2006) Mentoring for gender equality and organisational change. Employee Relations 28, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K and De Cock G (1988) Strategic human resources management and organizational culture. Working Paper, Centrum voor Organisetie en Personeelspychologie, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven.

  • Dickinson K (2006) Five years of mentoring by the numbers: SEED mentoring program. Presentation at the 2006 Grace Hopper Celebration of Women and Computing. Retrieved on 25 July 2009 from http://research.sun.com/SEED/hopper.presentation.oct06.pdf.

  • DTI Report (2004) Women in the IT industry: towards a business case for diversity. Retrieved on 1 March 2009, from http://www.intellectuk.org/content/view/490/47.

  • Duxbury L and Higgins C (2003) Work–life conflict: myths versus realities. FMI Journal 14 (3), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury LE, Higgins CA and Mills S (1992) After-hours telecommuting and work–family conflict: a comparative analysis. Information Systems Research 3 (2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A and Carau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109 (3), 573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferratt TW and Short LE (1986) Are information systems people different? An investigation of how they are and should be managed. MIS Quarterly 12 (3), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt LW and Newton DA (1981) When the mentor is a man and the protégé a woman. Harvard Business Review 59 (2), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • George R (2003) Achieving workforce diversity in the e-business on demand era. Retrieved on 1 March 2009, from http://www.intellectuk.org/content/view/490/47/.

  • Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass JL and Estes SB (1997) The family responsive workplace. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 289–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle K and Locke K (2006) Composing Qualitative Research 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia LR (1990) Women's adaptation to male-dominated occupations. International Journal of Manpower 11 (4), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Googins BK (1991) Work/Family Conflicts: Private Lives – Public Responses. Auburn House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus JH and Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Journal 10, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus JH, Collins KM and Shaw JD (2002) The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63, 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guelzow MG, Bird GW and Koball EH (1991) An exploratory path analysis of the stress process for dual-career men and women. Journal of Marriage Family 53, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman IR, Stanton JM, Stam KR, Vijayasri V, Yamodo I and Zakaria N (2004) A qualitative study of the occupational subculture of information systems employees in organizations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research pp 74–80, ACM Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (Ed) (2004) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headlam-Wells J (2004) E-mentoring for aspiring women managers. Women in Management Review 19 (4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig M and Jardim A (1977) The Managerial Woman. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett SA, Luce CB, Servon LJ, Sherbin L, Shiller P, Sosnovich E and Sumberg K (2008) The Athena factor: reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Harvard Business Review Research Report, Boston, MA.

  • Higgins C, Duxbury L and Lee C (1994) Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations 43 (2), 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins MC and Kram KE (2001) Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (2), 264–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C (2002) Key Concepts in Feminist Theory and Research. Sage Publications, Ltd., London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria M and Chidambaram L (1997) The impact of gender on career success of information systems professionals: a human capital perspective. Information Technology & People 10 (1), 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria M, Greenhaus JH and Parasuraman S (1991) Career orientations of MIS employees: an empirical analysis. Management Information Systems Quarterly 15 (2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria M, Parasuraman S and Badawy MK (1994) Work experiences, job involvement, and quality of work-life among information systems personnel. MIS Quarterly 18 (2), 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA and Bretz RD (1992) Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 77, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev A, Dobbin F and Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 71, 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klawe M, Whitney T and Simard C (2009) Women in computing – take 2. Communications of the ACM 52 (2), 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK and Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kram KE (1985) Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy PD and Ormrod JE (2005) Practical Research: Planning and Design 8th edn, Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert RL (1961) New Patterns of Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwin G and Stringer RA (1968) Motivation and Organizational Climate. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan K and Crump B (2007) The value of mentoring in facilitating the retention and upward mobility of women in ICT. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 15, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyness KS and Thompson DE (2000) Climbing the corporate ladder: do female and male executives follow the same route? Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1), 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby EE (1998) The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart, Coming Together. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini MM (1990) Sex and gender: what do we know? Sociological Forum 5 (1), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton AM (2001) Family-friendly workplaces the case for supporting work–life balance. The Calgary Children's Initiative, Calgary, Alberta, Canada http://www.childrensinitiative.ca.

  • Minguez AM (2005) New technologies as social fact: gender and digital divide in Spain in compared perspective. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Women and ICT: Creating Global Transformation (MORRELL C and SANDERS I, Eds) Article No. 16, ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan AJ, Quesenberry JL and Trauth EM (2004) Exploring the importance of social networks in the IT workforce: experiences with the ‘Boy's Club’. In Proceedings of the 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems (STOHR E and BULLEN C, Eds), pp 1313–1320, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1998) Images of Organization: The Executive Edition. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. and Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison AM, White RP and Velsor EV (1987) Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach the Top of America′s Largest Corporations? Perseus Publishing, Jackson, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen EJ and Noe RA (1999) The mentoring information exchange: when do mentors seek information from their protégés? Journal of Organizational Behavior 20, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon J and Simmering M (2006) Work–life balance. In Encyclopedia of Management (HELMS M, Ed), pp 976–980, Gale, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott S (1989) The Organizational Culture Perspective. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panko RR (2008) IT employment prospects: beyond the dotcom bubble. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RL (1991) Taking stock of corporate culture. Personnel Management 23 (7), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleeger SL and Mertz N (1995) Executive mentoring: what makes it work? Communications of the ACM 38 (1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfleeger SL and Mertz NT (2006) Making executive mentoring work in IT. In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology (TRAUTH EM, Ed), pp 863–869, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quesenberry JL, Trauth EM and Morgan A (2006) Understanding the ‘Mommy Tracks’: a framework for analyzing work–family issues in the IT workforce. Information Resources Management Journal 19 (2), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins BR and Cotton JL (1991) Easier said than done: gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal 34 (4), 939–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins BR and Cotton JL (1999) Mentor functions and outcomes: a comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (4), 529–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves R (2001) Happy Mondays: Putting the Pleasure Back into Work. Momentum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichers AE and Schneider B (1990) Climate and culture: an evolution of constructs. In Organizational Climate and Culture (SCHNEIDER B, Ed), Jossey-Bass, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemenschneider C, Armstrong D, Allen M and Reid M (2006) Barriers facing women in the IT workforce. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 37 (4), 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan M, Soe L and Yakura EK (2004) Perceptions of chilly IT organizational contexts and their effect on the retention and promotion of women in IT. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research pp 108–113, ACM Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser SV (2006) Using the lenses of feminist theories to focus on women and technology. In Women, Gender and Technology (FOX MF, JOHNSON DG and ROSSER SV, Eds), pp 13–46, University of Illinois Press, Chicago, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V, Bains D and Vinnicombe S (2002) Informal mentoring as an organizational resource. Long Range Learning 35, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soe L and Yakura EK (2008) What's wrong with the pipeline? Assumptions about gender and culture in IT work. Women's Studies 37 (3), 176–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow PR (2001) Developing diagnostics for high performance organization cultures. In The International Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (COOPER CL, CARTWRIGHT S and EARLEY PC, Eds), pp 85–106, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner M and Werner K (2001) The impact of gender differences on the career experiences of information systems professionals. In Proceedings of the ACM Computer Personnel Research Conference pp 125–131, ACM Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia AH, Kvasny L and Trauth EM (2004) Is there a retention gap for women and minorities: the case for moving in versus moving up. In Strategies for Managing IS/IT Personnel (SHAYO C, Ed), pp 143–164, Idea Group Inc., Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall A, Keogh C, Richardson HJ and Adam A (2006) Women and the IT workplace – issues from North West England. In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology (TRAUTH EM, Ed), pp 1252–1257, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LT and Ganster DC (1995) Impact of family supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: a control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (1), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM (2000) The Culture of an Information Economy: Influences and Impacts in the Republic of Ireland. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM (2002) Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession. Information Technology and People, Special Issue on Gender and Information Systems 15 (2), 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM (2006) Theorizing gender and information technology research. In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology (TRAUTH EM, Ed), pp 1154–1159, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM and Howcroft D (2006) Critical empirical research in IS: an example of gender and IT. Information Technology and People, Special Issue on Critical Research in Information Systems 19 (3), 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM and Jessup LM (2000) Understanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretive analysis of group support system use. MIS Quarterly 24 (1), 43–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM and Quesenberry JL (2006) Are women an underserved community in the information technology profession? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems pp1757–1770, Milwaukee, Wi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM, Quesenberry JL and Huang H (2008a) A multicultural analysis of factors influencing career choice for women in the information technology workforce. Journal of Global Information Management 16 (4), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM, Quesenberry JL and Morgan AJ (2004) Understanding the under representation of women in IT: toward a theory of individual differences. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS Computer Personnel Research Conference pp 114–119, ACM Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM, Quesenberry JL and Yeo B (2008b) Environmental influences on gender in the IT workforce. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 39 (1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JA and Baroudi JJ (1986) The management of information systems occupations: a research agenda. Computer Personnel 10 (4), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valian V (1998) Why so Slow? The Advancement of Women. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J (1991) Feminism Confronts Technology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman J (1998) Managing Like a Man: Women and Men in Corporate Management. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G and Sahay S (1999) GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardell M, Sawyer S, Reagor S and Mitory J (2006) Women in the United States’ IT workforce: current status and issues. Labor & Industry 16 (3), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J (2002) Widening Women's Work in Information and Communication Technology: Integrated Model of Explicative Variables. European Union for Information Society Technologies Programme, Namur, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil MM and Rosen LD (1995) The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: a study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior 11 (1), 95–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workforce Aging in the New Economy (WANE) (2004) Europe phase one: a selection of initial findings on employment diversity. Retrieved from: http://www.wane.ca.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the research funding provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF 0204246). We thank the editors and reviewers for the very constructive comments that they made in the reviews of the manuscript. These comments helped us to clarify our thinking and, thereby, significantly improve the quality of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, U.S.A.

    Eileen M Trauth

  2. Information Systems Program, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.

    Jeria L Quesenberry

  3. School of Management, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, U.S.A.

    Haiyan Huang

Authors
  1. Eileen M Trauth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeria L Quesenberry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haiyan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Appendix

Appendix

Interview topics

(From Trauth et al., 2004)

Participant Background

Demographic data (age, race/ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, relationship status, children, family's work background)

Work data (industry, job title, type of IT work, work history)

Type of work

Influencing Factors

Personal characteristics (education, interests and abilities, personality traits)

Personal influences (early exposure to IT, educational background and experiences, career progression/experiences, significant events and people)

Environmental Context

Geographical region: Cultural attitudes and values (attitude toward women, women working, women working in IT)

Workplace: Cultural attitudes and values (attitude toward women, women working, women working in IT)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trauth, E., Quesenberry, J. & Huang, H. Retaining women in the U.S. IT workforce: theorizing the influence of organizational factors. Eur J Inf Syst 18, 476–497 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.31

Keywords

Search

Navigation