Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eliciting tacit knowledge about requirement analysis with a Grammar-targeted Interview Method (GIM)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The assumption that tacit knowledge cannot be articulated remains dominant in knowledge elicitation. This paper, however, claims that linguistic theory does not support such a position and that language should not be factored out of accounts of tacit knowledge. We argue that Polanyi's (1966, p. 4) widely cited notion that ‘we know more than we can tell’ uses a folk model of language. This model does not acknowledge the linguistic patterns that competent language speakers deploy without direct awareness. This paper draws upon Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to propose a Grammar-targeted Interview Method (GIM). The GIM uses SFL to unpack linguistic patterning, which we refer to as ‘under-representation’, to reveal tacit assumptions. It is a strategy that can be applied within a traditional interview method when the interviewer feels that there is confusion resulting from assumptions, such as those often embedded in terminology, that have not been directly expressed. This paper reports findings from an empirical study of tacit knowledge about requirements analysis in a Content Management System redevelopment. We compared the GIM with a Content-motivated Interview Method (CMIM) and show that, when the GIM is used, interviewees respond with less nominalised talk, that is the less nominalised content has more meaning unpacked as verbs and agents rather than hidden tacitly in nouns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R and Tanniru MR (1990) Knowledge acquisition using structured interviewing: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (1), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ågerfalk PJ, Goldkuhl G, Fitzgerald B and Bannon L (2006) Reflecting on action in language, organisations and information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (1), 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V (2001) Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies 38 (6), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard P (1999) Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot M (1995) Information Space. A Framework of Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch P (2004) Acquisition of articulable tacit knowledge. In Proceedings of the Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KANG BH, HOFFMANN A, YAMAGUCHI T and YEAP WK, Eds), p 87, Springer, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo J (2002) A note on the concept of tacit knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry 11 (1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RJ (2001) Studies in organisational semiotics: an introduction. European Journal of Information Systems 8 (2), 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins HM (2001) Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science 31 (1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA and Simon HA (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth JR (1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK (1989) Spoken and Written Language. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd edn, Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK and Martin JR (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK and Matthiessen CMIM (1999) Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK and Webster J (2002) On Grammar. The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. Continuum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R, Klein HK and Lyytinen K (1996) Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: a social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 6 (1–2), 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iedema R (1997) The language of administration: organizing human activity in formal institutions. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (MARTIN JR and CHRISTIE F, Eds), pp 73–100, Cassell, London; Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson R (1971) Selected Writings 2d, expanded edn, Mouton, The Hauge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde C (2001) Narrative and social tacit knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (2), 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JR and Veel R (1998) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. Routledge, London; New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen CMIM (1995) Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. International Language Sciences, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna B and Graham P (2000) Technocratic discourse: a primer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 30 (3), 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell M (2002) Systemic coder. Wagsoft Systems.

  • Polanyi M (1958) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Peter Smith, Glovcester, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1969) Knowing and being. In Knowing and Being: Essays (GRENE MG, Ed), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber AS (1993) Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards D and Busch P (2003) Acquiring and applying contextualised tacit knowledge. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management 2 (2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose D (1998) Science discourse and industrial hierarchy. In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (MARTIN JR and VEEL R, Eds), pp 236–265, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper R (1997) Organisational semiotics. In Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? (MINGERS J and STOWELL F, Eds), pp 267–283, The McGraw-Hill Companies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ (2000) Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2002) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? Paper presented at the Knowledge Economy and Society Seminar. London School of Economics Department of Information Systems, London.

  • Tsoukas H and Mylonopoulos N (2004) Organizations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning, and Dynamic Capabilities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Learning in Doing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T and Flores F (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna M (2007) Eliciting tacit knowledge with a Grammar-targeted Interview Method. Unpublished Dissertation, School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, School of Letters, Art & Media, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Michele Zappavigna

  2. Faculty of Engineering, School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Jon Patrick

Authors
  1. Michele Zappavigna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Patrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Zappavigna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zappavigna, M., Patrick, J. Eliciting tacit knowledge about requirement analysis with a Grammar-targeted Interview Method (GIM). Eur J Inf Syst 19, 49–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.1

Keywords

Search

Navigation