Skip to main content
Log in

Information systems as a discipline in the making: comparing EJIS and MISQ between 1995 and 2008

  • Research Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

This paper aims to shed light on the dynamics of information systems (IS) as a discipline in the making. We use the ideas of the sociologist Abbott to propose three different stages of a discipline's development: differentiation, competition, and absorption. These stages reflect how disciplines go through different cycles and how they acquire, consolidate or lose elements of knowledge. We map these stages using citation and co-citation analyses of two main IS academic journals (EJIS and MISQ) from 1995 to 2008. Our results indicate that IS is currently in a stage of absorption, with research being consolidated around the theme of ‘IS acceptance’. Dominant models and frameworks related to this theme are predictive and thus lend themselves usable for positivistic and quantitative research. In this stage there is also a healthy degree of variety in IS including dormant elements which could reignite. Implications derived from our findings aim to help in the consolidation and extension of knowledge about IS in both academia and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIS (2007) Letter from Dennis Galletta, President, Association for Information Systems – November 2007. [WWW document] http://home.aisnet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=378.

  • Alavi M and Leidner DE (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25 (1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Lyytinen K, Sambamurthy V and Straub D (2011) A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R and Myers M (2002) Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quarterly 26 (1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I and Barki H (2007) Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4), 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Goldstein D and Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11 (3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I and Zmud R (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly 27 (2), 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl M, Kim H and Wade M (2006) Relationships among the academic business disciplines: a multi-method citation analysis. Omega 34 (4), 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG and Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard Analytic Technologies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau M-C, Gefen D and Straub DW (2001) Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly 25 (1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant A (2008) The future of information systems – thinking informatically. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6), 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W and Hirschheim R (2004) A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal 14, 197–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett CJ and Van Wassenhove LN (1993) The natural drift: what happened to operations research? Operations Research 41 (4), 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan MJ (1986) The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: a co-citation analysis. Management Science 32 (2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL and Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 (5), 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review July/August, 1–11.

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis G (2000) Information systems conceptual foundations: looking backward and forward. In Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology (Baskerville R, Stage J and Degross J, Eds), Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delone WH and McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3 (1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone WH and McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi Y and Kuljis J (2008) Profile of IS research published in the European Journal of Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 678–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell CR and Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield E (1979) Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG and Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldline, Hawthorne, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review July–August, 104–112.

  • Hassan N. (2006) Is information systems a discipline? A Foucauldian and Toulminian analysis. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, WI, US, pp 425–440.

  • Hirschheim R and Klein H (1989) Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM 32 (10), 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DL and Holbrook MB (1993) The intellectual structure of consumer research: a bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (March), 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari J, Hirschheim R and Klein HK (2004) Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for information systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Information Systems Journal 14 (4), 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Introna LD (2003) Disciplining information systems: truth and its regimes. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani Z, Ezingeard JN and Grieve RJ (1998) Costing the true costs of IT/IS investments: a focus during management decision making. Logistics Information Management 11 (1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives B, Olson MH and Baroudi JJ (1983) The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM 26 (10), 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada T and Kawai S (1989) An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters 31 (1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Savage KS, Howey RM and Van Hoof HB (2009) Academic foundations for hospitality and tourism research: a reexamination of citations. Tourism Management 30 (5), 752–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK and Hirschheim R (2008) The structure of the IS discipline reconsidered: implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective. Information and Organization 18 (4), 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein H and Myers M (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity M and Willcocks L (1998) An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly 22 (3), 363–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong SM (1989) A citation analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research. The Journal of Consumer Research 15 (4), 492–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L and Zhou P (2005) Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics 63 (3), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Yates J and Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM 30 (6), 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM 26 (6), 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RO (1978) Measuring information output: a communication systems approach. Information & Management 1 (5), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan FW (1984) Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review 61 (3), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M and Huberman M (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle H, Becker J, Frank U, Hess T, Karagiannis D, Krcmar H, Loos P, Mertens P, Oberweis A and Sinz EJ (2011) Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organisations. Organization Science 3 (3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ and Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2 (1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Berry LL and Zeithaml VA (1985a) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49 (4), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V and Berry L (1985b) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49 (4), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul RJ (2008) The only duty we owe to history is to rewrite it: reflections on Bob Galliers’ article ‘A discipline for a stage?’. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6), 444–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Vermunt J and Bijmolt T (1999) Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the international journal of research in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16 (2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington A and Chai KH (2008) Research themes, concepts and relationships: a study of international journal of service industry management (1990–2005). International Journal of Service Industry Management 19 (1), 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington A and Meredith J (2009) The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management – 1980–2006: a citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management 27 (3), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington A and Teichert T (2006) Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation 26 (3), 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt LF, Watson RT and Kavan CB (1995) Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly 19 (2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M and Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 63 (4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez AR and Ruíz-Navarro J (2004) Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal 25 (10), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF, Earl MJ and Ross JW (1996) Eight imperatives for the new IT organization. Sloan Management Review 38 (1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross JW, Beath CM and Goodhue DL (1996) Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review 38 (1), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1994) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8 (3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE and Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (IL).

  • Sharplin AD and Mabry RH (1985) The relative importance of journals used in management research: an alternative ranking. Human Relations 38 (2), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, Sakata I and Matsushima K (2011) Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications. Using Technological Intelligence for Strategic Decision Making in High Technology Environments 78 (2), 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers MJ (2010) Using the theory of the professions to understand the IS identity crisis. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (19), 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou CJ (2001) A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software. European Journal of Information Systems 10 (4), 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stremersch S, Verniers I and Verhoef PC (2007) The quest for citations: drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing 71 (3), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S and Todd P (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G and Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB and Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (ed.) (1991) Information Technology-Induced Business Reconfiguration: The New Strategic Management Challenge. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey I, Ramesh V and Glass RL (2002) Research in information systems: an empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (2), 129–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S and Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research 3 (4), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1997) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2), 489–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • White HD (1990) Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (Borgman CL, Ed.), pp 84–106, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White H and Griffith BC (1981) Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José-Rodrigo Córdoba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Córdoba, JR., Pilkington, A. & Bernroider, E. Information systems as a discipline in the making: comparing EJIS and MISQ between 1995 and 2008. Eur J Inf Syst 21, 479–495 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.58

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.58

Keywords

Navigation