Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretive accounts and fairy tales: a critical polemic against the empiricist bias in interpretive IS research

  • Research Essay
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

In 1995, Geoff Walsham wrote one of the most important and most widely cited papers on interpretivism in information systems (IS). Walsham's paper, along with his further work, represents a cornerstone of the discourse surrounding interpretive research. It has set the tone for further publications in the area and has more recently been followed up by a detailed practical account of how to undertake interpretive research by the same author. Using Walsham's position as a starting point, the present paper questions some basic assumptions of interpretivism. Drawing on the philosophical background of interpretivism in hermeneutics and phenomenology, the paper questions the status of empirical research in the interpretivist tradition. Using quality criteria of different research streams related to interpretivism, the paper compares the role of empirical data in different types of research accounts with fairy tales, noting that interpretive IS research shares at least as many quality features with fairy tales as with positivist narratives. The paper concludes by discussing which consequences this position has for interpretive and other research in IS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett M and Walsham G (1999) Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Information Systems Research 10 (1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beavers AF (2002) Phenomenology and artificial intelligence. Metaphilosophy 33 (1/2), 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I and Weber R (1996) Research commentary: rethinking ‘diversity’ in information systems research. Information Systems Research 7 (4), 389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL and Luckmann T (1991) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland R (1985) Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems: I.F.I.P. Colloquium Proceedings (Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G and Wood-Harper T, Eds), pp 193–201, North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G and Morgan G (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler T (1998) Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology (Routledge, Ltd.) 13 (4), 285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calás MB and Smircich L (1999) Past postmodernism? reflections and tentative directions. The Academy of Management Review 24 (4), 649–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro R and Pingel C (2002) Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3), 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic D (2011) Doing critical information systems research – arguments for a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (4), 440–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua WF (1986) Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review 61 (4), 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (2004) Encountering information systems as a phenomenon. In The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts (Avgerou C, Ciborra C and Land F, Eds) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges B (2004) Narratives in Social Science Research. SAGE, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doolin B and McLeod L (2005) Towards critical interpretivism in IS research. In Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application (Howcroft D and Trauth E, Eds), pp 244–271, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL (1992) What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, Revised edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond H and Hodgson J (2003) The chimpanzees’ tea party: a new metaphor for project managers. Journal of Information Technology (Routledge, Ltd.) 18 (3), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff D (2000) Modern Genre Theory. Longman, Harlow, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco U (1993) Unlimited semeiosis and drift: pragmaticism vs pragmatism. In Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries (KL, Ketner, Ed), pp 205–221, Fordham University Press.

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend PK (1980) How to be a good empiricist – a plea for tolerance in matters epistemological. In Challenges to Empiricism (Morick H, Ed), pp 164–193, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher WR (1984) Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs 51 (1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer H-G (1990) Wahrheit und Methode – Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. 6th edn, Mohr Siebeck e.K, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen K (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction 1st edn Sage Publications Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1975) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Penguin, Hamondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle K and Locke K (1993) Appealing work: an investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science 4 (4), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1993) Sein und Zeit 14th edn Max Niemeyer Verlag GmbH & Co KG, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J and Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Management information systems quarterly 28 (1), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R and Newman M (1991) Symbolism and information systems development: myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research 2 (1), 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (2004) A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. New edn, Penguin Classics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna LD (1997) Management, Information and Power: A Narrative of the Involved Manager. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Introna LD and Whittaker L (2002) The phenomenology of information systems evaluation: overcoming the subject/object dualism. In Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology (IFIP International Federation for Information Processing) (Wynn EH, Whitley EA, Myers MD and Degross JI, Eds), pp 156–175, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1907) Pragmatism. Project Gutenberg. [WWW document] http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5116 (accessed 8 June 2010).

  • Jones S (2001) Understanding micropolis and compunity. In Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village, SUNY Series in Computer-mediated Communication (Ess C and Sudweeks F, Eds), pp 53–66, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarst-Brown ML and Robey D (1999) More on myth, magic and metaphor. Information Technology & People 12 (2), 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1995) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Neuauflage. Studienausgabe). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK and Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law J and Singleton V (2000) Performing technology's stories: on social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture 41 (4), 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AS (1994) Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: an empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly 18 (2), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AS (2004) Thinking about social theory and philosophy for information systems. In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (Mingers J and Willcocks L, Eds), pp 1–26, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcon T and Gopal A (2008) Irony, critique and ethnomethodology in the study of computer work: irreconcilable tensions? Information Systems Journal 18 (2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride N (2008) Using performance ethnography to explore the human aspects of software quality. Information Technology & People 21 (1), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MS (1999) Causation and responsibility. In Responsibility: Volume 16, Part 2 (Social Philosophy & Policy) (Paul EF, Miller FDM and Paul J, Eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran D (1999) Introduction to Phenomenology, 1st edn Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morick H (1980) Introduction: the critique of contemporary empiricism. In Challenges to Empiricism (Morick H, Ed), pp 1–25, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD and Avison DE (Eds) (2002) Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader. Sage Publications Ltd, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD and Klein HK (2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 35 (1), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD and Walsham G (1998) Exemplifying interpretive research in information systems: an overview. Journal of Information Technology 13 (4), 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandhakumar J and Baskerville R (2011) Moderating a discourse on the moderating effects in the study of top management support. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (6), 691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Päivärinta T (2001) The concept of genre within the critical approach to information systems development. Information and Organization 11 (3), 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1980) Two dogmas of empiricism. In Challenges to Empiricism (Morick H, Ed), pp 46–70, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathswohl EJ (1991) Applying don ihde's phenomenology of instrumentation as a framework for designing research in information science. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions (Nissen H-E, Klein HF and Firschheim R, Eds), pp 421–438, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (1995) De l’interprétation. Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F (2011) Towards a greater diversity in writing styles, argumentative strategies and genre of papers. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (5), 12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze U (2000) A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly 24 (1), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze U and Leidner DE (2002) Studying knowledge management in information systems research: discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly 26 (3), 213–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl BC (2008) The ethical nature of critical research in information systems. Information Systems Journal 18 (2), 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D and Ang S (2011) Rigor and relevance in IS research: redefining the debate and a call for future research. MIS Quarterly 35 (1), iii–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutts NB and Barker RT (1999) The use of narrative paradigm theory in assessing audience value conflict in image advertising. Management Communication Quarterly 13 (2), 209–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talja S, Tuominen K and Savolainen R (2005) Isms’ in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation 61 (1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WI (2002) On the definition of the situation. In Self, Symbols, and Society: Classic Readings in Social Psychology (Rousseau N, Ed), pp 103–115, Rowman & Littlefield, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth EM and Jessup LM (2000) Understanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quarterly 24 (1), 43–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1991) The missing link: a transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review 16 (3), 566–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson L (2006) Critical Theory Today. CRC Press, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Blonk H (2003) Writing case studies in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 18 (1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner E (2002) Rhetoric of enrollment and acts of resistance: information technology as text. In Global and Organizational Discourse About Information Technology (IFIP International Federation for Information Processing) (Wynn EH, Whitley EA, Myers MD and DeGross JI, Eds), pp 419–435, Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995a) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995b) The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6 (4), 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2001) Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context New edn John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2002) Cross-cultural software production and use: a structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly 26 (4), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G and Sahay S (1999) GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (2004) The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS Quarterly 28 (1), iii–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. The Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, De Montfort University, UK

    Bernd Carsten Stahl

Authors
  1. Bernd Carsten Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Carsten Stahl.

Additional information

This paper contributes to the Contrarian Series and is followed by Walsham's response.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stahl, B. Interpretive accounts and fairy tales: a critical polemic against the empiricist bias in interpretive IS research. Eur J Inf Syst 23, 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.58

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.58

Keywords

Search

Navigation