Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Standards have played an important but often unrecognized role in the development of modern organizations. This role is accentuated by today’s growth of large business and government infrastructures, in the turbulent processes of globalization. In this paper, we investigate the relationships – and tensions – between standardization strategies and service innovation in the health-care sector. Our empirical material is seven longitudinal case studies in the Norwegian health-care sector, collected and analysed over a period of 20 years. We identify three generic standardization strategies; anticipatory standardization, integrated solutions and flexible generification. We argue that the first two strategies do not support service innovation while the strategy of flexible generification does so. We consider our results important for the evolution of the future ICT-enabled service economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbate J (1999) Inventing the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou C (2002) New socio-technical perspectives of is innovation in organizations. In ICT Innovation: Economic and Organizational Perspectives (Avgerou C and LaRovere RL, Eds), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry A (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. The Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind K (2013) The impact of standardization and standards on innovation. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research. [WWW document] http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_impact_of_standardization_and_standards_on_innovation.pdf, (accessed 13 February 2015).

  • Botzem S and Dobusch L (2012) Standardization cycles: a process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards. Organization Studies 33 (5–6), 737–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braa J, Hanseth O, Mohammed W, Heywood A and Shaw V (2007) Developing health information systems in developing countries. The flexible standards strategy. MIS Quarterly 31 (2), 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson N and Jacobsson B (2002) The contemporary expansion of standardization. In A World of Standards (Brunsson N, Jacobsson B and Associates, Eds), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson N, Rasche A and Seidl D (2012) The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies 33 (5–6), 613–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busquets J (2010) Orchestrating smart business network dynamics for innovation. European Journal of Information Systems 19 (4), 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T and Grimsmo A (2005) Development of functional requirements for electronic health communication: preliminary results from the ELIN project. Informatics in Primary Care 13 (3), 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (1992) From thinking to tinkering: the grassroots of strategic information systems. The Information Society 8 (4), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hertog P (2000) Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 4 (4), 491–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries HJ (1999) Standardization: A Business Approach to the Role of National Standardization Organizations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy SM, Herbig PR and Howes ME (1996) The innovation funnel. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 53 (3), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C and Yoo Y (2011) Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores. LSE Working Paper, http://is2.lse.ac.uk/wp/pdf/wp183.pdf.

  • Egyedi TM and Blind K (2008) The Dynamics of Standards. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chelterham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) The transformative power of service innovation. [WWW document] http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/initiatives/esic/materials/expert_panel_report.pdf, (accessed 13 February 2015).

  • Fitzsimmons JA and Fitzsimmons MJ (2000) New Service Development: Creating Memorable Experiences. Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomin V, Keil T and Lyytinen K (2003) Theorizing about standardization: integrating fragments of process theory in light of telecommunication standardization wars, Case Western Reserve University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 3(10), http://sprouts.aisnet.org/3-10.

  • Fürst (2014) Fürst forum. [WWW document] http://www.furst.no/for-legekontoret/furst-forum/ (accessed 22 April).

  • Hanseth O (2002) From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures. Toward a theory of ICT solutions and its design methodology implications. [WWW document] http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/ib_ISR_3rd_resubm2.html (accessed April 2014).

  • Hanseth O and Aanestad M (2003) Bootstrapping networks, communities and infrastructures – on the evolution of ICT solutions in healthcare. Methods of Information in Medicine 42 (4), 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth O and Lyytinen K (2010) Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: design Kernel theories and principles. Journal of Information Technology 25 (1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth O and Monteiro E (1997) Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Systems 7 (4), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth O, Monteiro E and Hatling M (1996) Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (4), 407–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henfridsson O and Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly 37 (3), 907–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt MA, Beamish PW, Jackson SE and Mathieu JE (2007) Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal 50 (6), 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOD (1996) Mer helse for hver BIT. [WWW document] http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/hod/dok/veiledninger_og_brosjyrer/1996/merhelse-for-hver-bit.html?id=87401, accessed 13 February 2015.

  • HOD (2008) Samspill 2.0 [WWW document] http://www.innomed.no/media/filer/14_Helsedirektoratet_samspill_2.0_og_sammendrag.pdf, accessed 13 February 2015.

  • Hovenga EJS, Kidd MR, Garde S and Hullin Lucay Cossio C (2010) Health Informatics: An Overview. IOS Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU (2012) E-health standards and interoperability. ITU-T Technology Watch Report April 2012. [WWW document] http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/23/01/T23010000170001PDFE.pdf (accessed 7 April 2014).

  • Johannessen LK and Ellingsen G (2009) Integration and generification – Agile software development in the healthcare market. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 18 (5–6), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24 (4), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig L (2001) The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach. Harvard Law Review 113, 501–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF and Nambisan S (2014) Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly 39 (1), 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K and King J (2006) Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research. MIS Quarterly 30 (Special Issue), 405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB and Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science 24 (9), 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOH (2012) Én innbygger – én journal. Digitale tjenester i helse- og omsorgssektoren. Meld. St. 9 (2012–2013). Melding til Stortinget. Det Kongelige Helse- og Omsorgsdepartement, [WWW document] https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/aktuelt/en-innbygger---en-journal/id708834/, (accessed 13 February 2015).

  • Nardelli G (2012) The complex relationship between ICT and innovation in services: a literature review. In SCIS 2012 (Keller C, Wiberg M, Ågerfalk PJ and Eriksson Lundström JSZ, Eds), LNBIP 124 pp 1–24, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson JV and zur Muehlen M (2006) The ecology of standards processes: insights from intenret standard making. MISQ 30 (Special Issue on Standardization), 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop L et al (2006) Ultra-Large-Scale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, [WWW document] http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/uls_book20062.pdf, (accessed 13 February 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen ML (1996) Standardisering og systemutvikling. To Case fra Helsesektoren. Hovedoppgave i informatikk ved NTNU, Trondheim, (in Norwegian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1985) Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. In Research Methods in Information Systems (Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitgerald G and Wood-Harper AT, Eds) pp 53–78, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock N, Williams R and D’adderio L (2007) Global software and its provenance: generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Social Studies of Science 37 (2), 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RFC (1996) The internet standards process – revision 3. RFC 2026, IAB and IESG. [WWW document] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt (accessed 7 October 2013).

  • Riksrevisjonen (2014) Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse om elektronisk meldingsutveksling i helse- og omsorgssektoren. Dokument 3:6 (2013–2014). [WWW document] http://www.riksrevisjonen.no/Rapporter/Documents/2013-2014/RiksrevisjonensUnders%C3%B8kelseOmElektroniskMeldingsutveksling.pdf (accessed 24 April 2014).

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzer JH, Reed DP and Clark DD (1984) End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 2 (4), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer C and Willcocks LP (2007) Unreasonable expectations – NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes. Journal of Information Technology. 22 (3), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt SK and Werle R (1998) Coordinating Technology: Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JS (2012) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star SL and Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research 7 (1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J and Bessant J (2009) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J and Hull FM (2003) Service Innovation. Organizational Responses to Technological Opportunities & Market Imperatives. Imperial College Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Updegrove A (2007) ICT standard setting today: a system under stress. First Monday, 12 (6). [WWW document] http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_6/updegrove/index.html.

  • van den Ende J, van de Kaa G, den Uijl S and de Vries HJ (2012) The paradox of standard flexibility: the effects of co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network. Organization Studies 33 (5–6), 705–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakke P, Blind K and de Vries HJ (2012) The relationship between innovation in services and standardization: empirical evidence of service providers’ involvement in standardization. [WWW document] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2045484, accessed 13 February 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Ole Hanseth & Bendik Bygstad

Authors
  1. Ole Hanseth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bendik Bygstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Appendix

Appendix

$-format

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanseth, O., Bygstad, B. Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care. Eur J Inf Syst 24, 645–663 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.1

Keywords

Search

Navigation