Skip to main content
Log in

Economic decision criteria for the migration to cloud storage

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Cloud storage has fast become a widespread alternative to in-house costly storage infrastructures. However, the migration to cloud storage is not necessarily everybody’s best choice and should be evaluated in a rigorous quantitative way against the alternative over a long time horizon. We propose a methodological approach for the comparison of cloud vs in-house solutions, based on the use of the Net Present Value and employing stochastic models for storage prices and memory needs. We analyse two decision criteria, which employ the median and the mean value of the Differential Net Present Value (DNPV), respectively. Through three appropriate risk measures, we show that the mean DNPV is the less risky decision criterion. Since the DNPV is a stochastic quantity, we also consider a protection measure against the risk of taking the wrong decision, which relies on underwriting an insurance policy. Through the real options approach, we propose a pricing formula for such policy, showing that it is an affordable means to hedge against risk for smaller companies and over a limited time horizon. Both the decision criteria and the insurance pricing formula are applied in a typical scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Libdeh H, Princehouse L and Weatherspoon H (2010) Racs: a case for cloud storage diversity. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SoCC 2010, pp 229–240, ACM Publications, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

  • Bhattacherjee A and Park SC (2014) Why end-users move to the cloud. European Journal of Information Systems 23 (3), 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan NH and Wong HY (2006) Simulation Techniques in Financial Risk Management. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin T (2003) Current trends in data storage backup and restoration. Graduate Engineering Seminar, Santa Clara University. [WWW document] http://www.tomcoughlin.com/Techpapers/SCU%20Backup%20Presentation,%20021303.pdf (accessed 22 July 2014).

  • Eleftheriou E, Haas R, Jelitto J, Lantz MA and Pozidis H (2010) Trends in storage technologies. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 33 (4), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg AG, Hamilton JR, Maltz DA and Patel P (2009) The cost of a cloud: research problems in data center networks. Computer Communication Review 39 (1), 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert M and López P (2011) The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science 332 (6025), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashef MM and Altmann J (2011) A cost model for hybrid clouds. TEMEP Discussion Paper 2011:82, Seoul National University, College of Engineering Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program.

  • Khajeh-Hosseini A, Greenwood D, Smith JW and Sommerville I (2012) The cloud adoption toolkit: supporting cloud adoption decisions in the enterprise. Software, Practice and Experience 42 (4), 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SS, Khouja MJ and Kumar RL (2013) Effects of time-inconsistent preferences on information technology infrastructure investments with growth options. European Journal of Information Systems 22 (2), 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laatikainen G, Mazhelis O and Tyrväinen P (2014) Role of acquisition intervals in private and public cloud storage costs. Decision Support Systems 57 (1), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk A, Klems M, Nimis J, Tai S and Sandholm T (2009) What’s inside the cloud? An architectural map of the cloud landscape. In Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges of Cloud Computing, CLOUD ‘09, pp 23–31, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA.

  • Li H, Zhong L, Liu J, Li B and Xu K (2011) Cost-effective partial migration of vod services to content clouds. In IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD 2011, pp 203–210, IEEE, Washington DC, USA.

  • Makarenko AV (2011) Phenomenological model for growth of volumes digital data. CoRR, abs/1102.5500. arXiv preprint series.

  • Mastroeni L and Naldi M (2011a) Long-range evaluation of risk in the migration to cloud storage. In 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, CEC 2011, pp 260–266, IEEE, Luxembourg.

  • Mastroeni L and Naldi M (2011b) Storage buy-or-lease decisions in cloud computing under price uncertainty. In 7th EuroNF Conference on Next Generation Internet, IEEE, Kaiserslautern.

  • Mastroeni L and Naldi M (2012a) Analysis of cloud storage prices. arXiv preprint series, CoRR. Preprint no. 1207.6011v1.

  • Mastroeni L and Naldi M (2012b) Pricing of insurance policies against cloud storage price rises. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 40 (2), 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcneil AJ, Frey R and Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton Series in Finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naldi M (2014) Forecast uncertainty in procurement decisions for cloud storage. In 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, pp 237–242, IEEE, Cambridge, UK.

  • Naldi M and Mastroeni L (2013) Cloud storage pricing: a comparison of current practices. In HotTopiCS Workshop, Colocated with the 4th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering ICPE, pp 27–34, ACM Publications, Prague.

  • Newman DG, Eschenbach TG and Lavelle JP (2004) Engineering Economic Analysis, 9th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel CD and Shah AJ (2005) Cost model for planning, development and operation of a data center. Technical Report HPL-2005-107R1, HP.

  • Pinheiro E, Weber WD and Barroso LA (2007) Failure trends in a large disk drive population. In 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, FAST 2007, pp 17–28, USENIX, San Jose, CA, USA.

  • Poitras G (1998) Spread options, exchange options, and arithmetic brownian motion. The Journal of Futures Markets 18 (5), 487–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder B and Gibson GA (2007) Disk failures in the real world: what does an MTTF of 1,000,000 hours mean to you? In 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, FAST 2007, pp 1–16, USENIX, San Jose, CA, USA.

  • Szegö G (2005) Measures of risk. European Journal of Operational Research 163 (1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VV.AA. (2014) The digital universe of opportunities. Technical Report, EMC-IDC.

  • Walker E, Brisken W and Romney J (2010) To lease or not to lease from storage clouds. IEEE Computer 43 (4), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research (MIUR) under PRIN 2012C4E3KT national research project AMANDA – Algorithmics for MAssive and Networked DAta.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Naldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naldi, M., Mastroeni, L. Economic decision criteria for the migration to cloud storage. Eur J Inf Syst 25, 16–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.34

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.34

Keywords

Navigation