Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mindful revolution or mindless trend? Examining agile development as a management fashion

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

The growing adoption of agile methods of system development can be seen as broadly consistent with characteristics of a management fashion. However, the extent that fashions relate to how specific organizations actually adopt and use agile remains unclear. Based on five case studies, this research seeks to apply the concepts from management fashion theory to understand how organizations mindfully (or mindlessly) adopt agile methods. We find in some cases that agile appears to be characterized as a short-term, transitory trend, while in others it is embedded in an organization’s processes and culture. We identify three categories that distinguish between fashion patterns during agile adoptions: Crusaders, who exclusively adopt agile in a pure form; Tailors, who integrate agile and traditional approaches to fit their specific circumstances; and Dabblers who employ a few ceremonial agile activities alongside a traditional approach. The results from this study can encourage managerial awareness of the link between fashions and agile development, which can serve to highlight the unique opportunities to enhance mindfulness and avoid the pitfalls of mindlessness. By uncovering insights into the fashion-centric drivers of agile adoption, this research extends past theory related to both mindful innovation and management fashions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review 16 (3), 586–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson E (1996) Management fashion. Academy of Management Review 21 (1), 254–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson E and Fairchild G (1999) Management fashion: lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4), 708–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsson P, Conboy K and Wang X (2009) ‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile systems development research. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (4), 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balijepally V, Mahapatra R, Nerur S and Price KH (2009) Are two heads better than one for software development? The productivity paradox of pair programming. MIS Quarterly 33 (1), 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville RL and Myers MD (2009) Fashion waves in information systems research and practice. MIS Quarterly 33 (4), 647–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck K et al (2001) ‘Manifesto for agile software development.’ Retrieved August 2014, from [WWW document] http://agilemanifesto.org.

  • Benders J and Van Veen K (2001) What’s in a fashion? Interpretive viability and management fashions. Organization 8 (1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron F, Raymond L and Rivard S (2004) Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & Management 41 (8), 1003–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm B and Turner R (2003) Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer 36 (6), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BS and Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quarterly 30 (2), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Mohan K, Xu P and Ramesh B (2009) A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (4), 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson PP, Lanier PA, Carson KD and Birkenmeier BJ (1999) A historical perspective on fad adoption and abandonment. Journal of Management History 5 (6), 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow T and Cao D-B (2007) A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. The Journal of Systems and Software 81 (6), 961–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark T (2004) The fashion of management fashion: a surge too far? Organization 11 (2), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conboy K (2009) Agility from first principles: reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research 20 (3), 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conboy K and Fitzgerald B (2010) Method and developer characteristics for effective agile method tailoring: a study of xp expert opinion. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 20 (1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cesare S, Lycett M, Macredie RD, Patel C and Paul R (2010) Examining perceptions of agility in software development practice. Communications of the ACM 53 (6), 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingsoyr T, Nerur S, Balijepally V and Moe NB (2012) A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software 85 (6), 1213–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury M, Conboy K and Power K (2012) Obstacles to decision making in agile software development teams. The Journal of Systems and Software 85 (6), 1239–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube L and Pare G (2003) Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly 27 (4), 597–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyba T and Dingsoyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50 (9-10), 833–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol CM and O’Connor EJ (2003) Waking up! mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. The Academy of Management Review 28 (1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald B, Hartnett G and Conboy K (2006) Customising agile methods to software practices at intel Shannon. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (2), 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim R, Murungi DM and Pena S (2012) Witty invention or dubious fad? Using argument mapping to examine the contours of management fashion. Information and Organization 22 (1), 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom H, Fitzgerald B, Agerfalk PJ and Conchuir EO (2006) Agile practices reduce distance in global software development. Information Systems Management 23 (3), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janes A and Succi G (2012) The dark side of agile software development. Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software, 19–26 October, Association for Computing Machinery, Tucson, Arizona.

  • Kieser A (1997) Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization 4 (1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanti M, Salo O and Abrahamsson P (2011) Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: a survey of opinions on agile transformation. Information and Software Technology 53 (3), 276–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer EJ (1989a) Mindfulness. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer EJ (1989b) Minding matters: the consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22, 137–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer EJ (1997) The Power of Mindful Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer EJ, Blank A and Chanowitz B (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of ‘placebic’ information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (6), 635–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EEI and Mohrman SA (1985) Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review 63 (1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal D and Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science 17 (4), 502–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangalaraj G, Mahapatra R and Nerur S (2009) Acceptance of software process innovations – the case of extreme programming. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (4), 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruping LM, Zhang X and Venkatesh V (2009) Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (4), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matook S and Kautz K (2008) Mindfulness and agile software development. In: 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Christchurch.

  • McAvoy J, Nagle T and Sammon D (2013) Using mindfulness to examine Isd agility. Information Systems Journal 23 (2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW and Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczar L (2013) Why agile isn‘t working: bringing common sense to agile principles. CIO, June 4, [WWW document] http://www.cio.com/article/2385322.

  • Mu E and Butler BS (2009) The assessment of organizational mindfulness processes for the effective assimilation of it innovations. Journal of Decision Systems 18 (1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerur S and Balijepally V (2007) Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies. Communications of the ACM 50 (3), 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerur S, Mahapatra R and Mangalaraj G (2005) Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM 48 (5), 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Swan J and Kautz K (2001) The role of funding bodies in the creation and diffusion of management fads and fashions. Organization 8 (1), 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell S, Swan J and Robertson M (1998) A cross-national comparison of the adoption of business process reengineering: fashion-setting networks? Journal of Strategic Information Systems 7 (4), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port D and Bui T (2009) Simulating mixed agile and plan-based requirements prioritization strategies: proof-of-concept and practical implications. European Journal of Information Systems 18 (4), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramiller NC, Swanson EB and Wang P (2008) Research directions in information systems: toward an institutional ecology. Journal for the Association for Information Systems 9 (1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich BH and Benbasat I (2000) Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly 24 (1), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senapathi M and Srinivasan A (2012) Understanding post-adoptive agile usage: an exploratory cross-case analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software 85 (6), 1255–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp H, Biddle R, Gray P, Miller L and Patton J (2006) Agile development: opportunity or fad? In CHI ‘06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 22–27 April Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal, Canada.

  • Swanson EB and Ramiller NC (1997) The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science 8 (5), 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson EB and Ramiller NC (2004) Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Quarterly 28 (4), 553–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidgen R and Wang X (2009) Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Information Systems Research 20 (3), 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinekar V, Slinkman CW and Nerur S (2006) Can agile and traditional systems development approaches coexist? An ambidextrous view. Information Systems Management 23 (3), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogus TJ and Welbourne TM (2003) Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (7), 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P (2010) Chasing the hottest it: effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Quarterly 34 (1), 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Conboy K and Pikkarainen M (2012) Assimilation of agile practices in use. Information Systems Journal 22 (6), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE and Sutcliffe KM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science 17 (4), 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West D and Grant T (2010) Agile development: mainstream adoption has changed agility. Forrester Research, pp. 1–20, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrup C (2003) Discourse, Management Fashions, and Erp Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbaracki MJ (1998) The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (3), 602–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information and Process Management, Bentley University, Waltham, U.S.A.

    W Alec Cram

  2. University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.

    Sue Newell

Authors
  1. W Alec Cram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sue Newell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W Alec Cram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cram, W., Newell, S. Mindful revolution or mindless trend? Examining agile development as a management fashion. Eur J Inf Syst 25, 154–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.13

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.13

Keywords

Search

Navigation