Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach

  • Opinion Piece
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

In this article we propose a new complementary approach to investigate Inter-Organizational Information Systems (IOIS) adoption called configuration analysis. We motivate the need for a new approach by the common observation that the structure and the strategy of an IOIS are interdependent and that the IOIS adoptions consequently cluster orderly. For example, an IOIS setup with a powerful customer as a hub and many suppliers as spokes frequently surfaces across diffusion studies. Yet, this fact has not been integrated into existing analyses, and its implications have not been fully developed. We propose that IOIS scholars need to look beyond the single adopting organization in IOIS adoption studies and in contrast consider adoption units what we call an adoption configuration. Each such configuration can be further characterized along the following dimensions: (1) vision, (2) key functionality, (3) mode of interaction, (4) structure and (5) mode of appropriation. In addition, these dimensions do not co-vary independently. For example, a particular organizing vision assumes a specific inter-organizational structure. A typology of IOIS configurations for adoption analysis is laid out consisting of dyadic, hub and spoke, industry and community configurations. Specific forms or adoption analysis are suggested for each type of configuration. Overall, configuration analysis redirects IOIS adoption studies both at the theoretical and the methodological level, and a corresponding research agenda is sketched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Ali M, Kurnia S and Johnston RB (2008) A dyadic model of interorganizational systems (IOS) adoption maturity. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Computer Society Press, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PB, Emmeche C and Finnemann NO (Eds) (2000) Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos Y and Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: implications for internet platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems 25 (2), 172–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra A and de Vries J (2008) Managing stakeholders around inter-organizational systems: a diagnostic approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (3), 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard L (1993) Decision Criteria in The Adoption of EDI. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems (DEGROSS JI, BOSTROM RP and ROBEY, Eds), pp 365–376, 5–8 December, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H and Spohrer J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Communication of the ACM 49 (7), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe J-M (2008) Inter-organizational relationships and the flow of information through value chains. Information & Management 45 (7), 444–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (1998) Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C (2000) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economia 4 (16), 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland DG and McKenney JL (1988) Airline reservations systems: lessons from history. Management Information Systems Quarterly 12 (3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox B and Ghoneim S (1996) Drivers and barriers to adopting EDI: a sector analysis of U.K. industry. European Journal of Information Systems 5, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J (1996) The diffusion of electronic data interchange: an institutional and organizational analysis of alternative diffusion patterns. Ph.D. Thesis, R-96-2041, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg.

  • Damsgaard J and Lyytinen K (1997) Hong Kong's EDI bandwagon. Derailed or on the right track? In Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership: Learning from Practice and Research (MCMASTER T, MUMFORD E, SWANSON EB, WARBOYS B and WASTELL D, Eds), pp 39–63, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J and Lyytinen K (1998) Contours of electronic data interchange in Finland: overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 7, 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J and Lyytinen K (2001a) Building electronic trading infrastructure: a private or public responsibility? Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 11 (2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J and Lyytinen K (2001b) The role of intermediating institutions in diffusion of electronic data interchange (EDI): how industry associations in the grocery sector intervened in Hong Kong, Finland, and Denmark. The Information Society 17 (3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsgaard J and Truex D (2000) The procrustean bed of standards. binary relations and the limits of EDI standards. European Journal of Information Systems 9 (3), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly 13, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM and Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. The Academy of Management Review 32 (2), 480–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhaye R and Lobet-Maris C (1995) EDI adoption and standard choice: a conceptual model. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Systems (DOUKIDIS G, GALLIERS B, JELASSI T and LAND F, Eds), pp 165–182, Print Xpress, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ and Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham I, Pollock N, Smart A and Williams R (2003) Institutionalisation of e-Business standards. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems, pp 1–9, Seattle, Washington.

  • Hart P and Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science 8 (1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard M, Vidgen R and Powell P (2006) Automotive e-hubs: exploring motivations and barriers to collaboration and interaction. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15 (1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou CL, Benbasat I and Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly 19 (4), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Martinez J and Polo-Redondo Y (2001) Key variables in the EDI adoption by retail firms. Technovation 21 (6), 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston HR and Vitale M (1988) Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 12 (2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambil A and Short JE (1994) Electronic integration and business network redesign: a roles-linkage perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 10 (4), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL, McFarlan FW, Raman KS and Yap CS (1994) Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 5 (2), 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JL and Konsynski B (1990) Singapore Tradenet: A Tale of One City. Harvard Business School, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein K and Kozlowski S (Eds) (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations – Foundations, Extensions and New Directions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K and van Dissel HG (1996) Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 20 (3), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurnia S and Johnston RB (2000) The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (4), 295–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24 (4), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TJ (2001) The phenomenon of diffusion. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.6 Forth Working Conference on Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations (ARDIS MA and MARCOLIN BL, Eds), pp 35–50, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, Banff, Canada.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S and Lim GG (2005) The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success. Information & Management 42, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K and Damsgaard J (2001) What's wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory? The case of a complex and networked technology. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Group 8.6 Conference, Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations (Ardis MA and Marcolin BL Eds), pp 173–190, Banff, Canada, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen KJ and Newman M (2008) Explaining information system change: a punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6), 589–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay D (1993) The impact of EDI on the components sector of the Australian automotive industry. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2 (3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manabe S, Fujisue K and Kurokawa S (2005) A comparative analysis of EDI integration in us and Japanese automobile suppliers. International Journal of Technology Management 30 (3–4), 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML, Steinfield CW, Wigand RT and Minton G (2006) Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the U.S. Residential mortgage industry. Management Information Systems Quarterly 30, 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason RO, McKenney JL and Copeland DG (1997) Developing an historical tradition in MIS research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 21 (3), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier J and Suhl H (1995) Empirical survey of EDI applied in practice. International Journal of Electronic Markets 15, 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer AD, Tsui AS and Hinings CR (1993) Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal 36 (6), 1175–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal 7, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1996) Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal 17, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2001) Combining is research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12 (3), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1983) Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy A (2006) Collaboration and conflict in the electronic integration of supply networks. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Computer Society Press, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard-Andersen S and Bjørn-Andersen N (1994) To join or not to join: a framework for evaluating electronic data interchange systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 3 (3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan R and Eistert T (1995) An association's leadership for industry-wide EDI – the case of AECOC in Spain. In EDI in Europe: How it Works in Practice (KRCMAR H, BJRN-ANDERSEN N and O’CALLAGHAN R, Eds), pp 277–297, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 28, 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ and Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, organization and work. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1), 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technological change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland B (1999) Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Academy of Management Review 24 (4), 711–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations – A Critical Essay. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouloudi A and Whitley EA (1997) Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems. European Journal of Information Systems 6, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G and Ramamurthy K (1996) The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences 26 (3), 303–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C (1987) The Comparative Method; Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers K and Johnston RB (2008) (Eds) The use of an explicitly theory-driven data coding method for high-level theory testing in IOIS ICIS 2008 Proceedings, Paper 184, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/184

  • Reimers K, Johnston RB and Klein S (2008) A theorizing evolution of inter-organizational information systems on long timescales. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 8 (31), 8–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako M (1996) Suppliers’ associations in the Japanese automobile industry: collective action for technology diffusion. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (6), 651–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surmon L and Huff S (1995) Hong Kong's Tradelink: An EDI vision. The University of Western Ontario, Western Business School, London, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sviokla JJ and Marshall CL (1994) Baxter International: On Call as Soon as Possible? Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson E and Ramiller N (1997) The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science 8, 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG and Klein KJ (1982) Innovation characteristics and adoption-implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM 29 (1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven A, Polley D, Garud R and Venkataraman S (1999) The Innovation Journey. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB and Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly 27, 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J (1995) Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 4 (1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics 22 (2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley CD, Wagenaar RW and Clarke RA (1994) Electronic data interchange in international trade: frameworks for the strategic analysis of ocean port communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 3 (3), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2010) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn., Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to John King for comments on the earlier drafts of the manuscript. We are also grateful for the AE and two reviewers for constructive and helpful comments. All the remaining weaknesses remain the responsibility of the authors. This research was in part supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research, Social Sciences (FSE), grant number # 275–08–0342.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Case Western Reserve University, U.S.A.

    Kalle Lyytinen

  2. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark & Curtin University of Technology, Australia

    Jan Damsgaard

Authors
  1. Kalle Lyytinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Damsgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Damsgaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyytinen, K., Damsgaard, J. Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach. Eur J Inf Syst 20, 496–509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.71

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.71

Keywords

Search

Navigation