Abstract
A fundamental tenet of the information systems (IS) discipline holds that: (a) a lack of formal power and influence over the organization targeted for change, (b) weak support from top management, and (c) organizational memories of prior failures are barriers to implementation success. Our research, informed by organization influence, compellingly illustrates that such conditions do not necessarily doom a project to failure. In this paper, we present an analysis of how an IS implementation team designed and enacted a coordinated strategy of organizational influence to achieve implementation success despite these barriers. Our empirical analysis also found that technology implementation and change is largely an organizational influence process (OIP), and thus technical-rational approaches alone are inadequate for achieving success. Our findings offer managers important insights into how they can design and enact OIPs to effectively manage IS implementation. Further, we show how the theory of organizational influence can enhance understanding of IS implementation dynamics and advance the development of a theory of effective IS change agentry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an extensive review of power and politics in IS literature, the reader is advised to consult Jasperson et al (2002).
References
Aaen I, Aarent J, Mathiassen l and Ngwenyama O (2001) A conceptual map of software process improvement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 13, 81–102.
Abrahamsson P (2001) Rethinking the concept of commitment in software process improvement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 13, 37–61.
Ansari MA and Kapoor A (1987) Organizational context and upward influence tactics. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 40 (1), 39–49.
Avgerou C and McGrath K (2007) Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change. MIS Quarterly 31 (2), 295–315.
Balkundi P and Harrison DA (2006) Ties, leaders, and time in teams: strong inference about structure's effects on teams. The Academy of Management Journal 49 (1), 49–68.
Bass BM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York.
Belkaoui A (1990) Leadership style, dimensions of superior's upward influence and participative budgeting. Scandinavian Journal of Management 6 (3), 217–230.
Benbasat I, Goldstein DK and Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11 (3), 369–386.
Blaikie N (2008) Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
Börjesson A and Mathiassen L (2004) Improving software organizations: agility challenges and implications. Information Technology and People 18 (4), 359–382.
Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (4), 518–539.
Brown AD (1995) Managing understandings: politics, symbolism, niche marketing and the quest for legitimacy in IT implementation. Organization Studies 16 (6), 951.
Brown AD (1998) Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies 35 (1), 35–58.
Buchanan DA (2008) You stab my back, i’ll stab yours: management experience and perceptions of organization political behavior. British Journal of Management 19 (1), 49–64.
Buchanan DA and Badham R (1999) Politics and organizational change: the lived experience. Human Relations 52 (5), 609–629.
Campbell DT (1975) Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative political studies 8 (1), 178–191.
Cohen AR and Bradford DL (2003) Influence without authority: the use of alliances, reciprocity, and exchange to accomplish work. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 384–394, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Cook K (1977) Exchange and power in networks of inter-organizational relations. Sociological Quarterly 18 (1), 62–88.
Cook KS and Emerson RM (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 43 (5), 721–739.
Cummings JN and Cross R (2003) Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks 25 (3), 197–210.
Dansereau F Jr., Graen G and Haga WJ (2003) A vertical dyad linkage within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation of the role making process. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 181–207, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Drake BH and Moberg DJ (1986) Communicating influence attempts in dyads: linguistic sedatives and aplliatives. Academy of Management Review 11 (3), 567–584.
Drory A and Romm RT (1990) The definition of organizational politics. Human Relations 43 (11), 1133–1154.
Dybå T (2005) An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 (5), 410–424.
Egan G (1994) Working the Shadow Side: A Guide to Positive Behind the Scenes Management. Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Ein-Dor P and Segev E (1978) Organizational context and the success of management information systems. Management Science 24 (10), 1064–1077.
Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.
Erez M (1986) The congruence of goal-setting strategies with socio-cultural values and its effect on performance. Journal of Management 12 (4), 585.
Falbe CM and Yukl G (1992) Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. The Academy of Management Journal 35 (3), 638–652.
Farmer SM and Maslyn JM (1999) Why are styles of upward influence neglected? Making the case for a configurational approach to influences. Journal of Management 25 (5), 653–682.
Floyd SW and Wooldridge B (1997) Middle management's strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies 34 (3), 465–485.
Friedkin NE and Johnsen EC (1999) Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in Group Process 16 (1), 1–29.
Frost PJ and Egri CP (1991) The political process of innovation. In Researching Organization Behaviour (Cummings LL and Staw BM, Eds), pp 229–295, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Gattiker TF and Carter CR (2010) Understanding project champions’ ability to gain intra-organizational commitment for environmental projects. Journal of Operations Management 28 (1), 72–85.
Gupta S and Case TL (1999) Managers’ outward influence tactics and their consequences: an exploratory study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 20 (6), 300–308.
Hansen B, Rose J and Tjørnehzøj G (2004) Prescription, description, reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field. International Journal of Information Management 24 (6), 457–472.
Hart P and Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science 8 (1), 23–42.
Humphrey W (1989) Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
Humphrey WS (1992) Introduction to software process improvement. Technical report, CMU/SEI-92-TR-007, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jasperson J, Carte TA, Saunders CS, Butler B, Croes HJP and Zheng W (2002) Power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly 26 (4), 397–459.
Jiang JJ, Muhanna WA and Klein G (2000) User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types. Information & Management 37 (1), 25–36.
Iversen J, Nielsen PA and Nørbjerg J (1999) Situated assessments of problems in software development. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 30 (2), 66–81.
Kakabadse A and Parker C (1984) Power, Politics and Organizations: A Behavioural Science view. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (1), 51–60.
Kerr S (2003) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 155–168, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Kipnis D (2003) The use of power. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 17–32, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Kipnis D and Schmidt SM (1988) Upward-influence styles: relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (4), 528–542.
Kipnis D, Schmidt SM and Wilkinson I (1980) Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (4), 440.
Klein K, Lim B, Saltz J and Mayer D (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal 47 (6), 952–963.
Klein HK and Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–93.
Kotter JP (2003) Power, dependence, and effective management. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 127–141, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Krackhardt D and Hanson J (1993) Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review 71 (4), 104–111.
Kuvaja P, Similä J, Krzanik L, Bicego A, Koch G and Saukkonen S (1994) Software Process Assessment and Improvement: The Bootstrap Approach. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Lee AS (1989) A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly 13 (1), 33–50.
Lee AS and Baskerville R (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research 14 (3), 221–243.
Lee JC and Myers MD (2004) Dominant actors, political agendas, and strategic shifts over time: a critical ethnography of an enterprise systems implementation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (4), 355–374.
Lin N (2001) Building a network theory of social capital. In Social Capital Theory and Research (Lin N, Cook K and Burt R, Eds), Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Markham SK (1998) A longitudinal examination of how champions influence others to support their projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15 (6), 490–504.
Markus ML (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM 26 (6), 430–444.
Markus ML and Benjamin RI (1996) Change agentry: the next IS frontier. MIS Quarterly 20 (4), 385–407.
Mathiassen L (2002) Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People 15 (4), 321–345.
Mathiassen L, Pries-Heje J and Ngwenyama O (2002) Improving Software Organizations: From Principles to Practice. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachusetts.
McFeeley B (1996) Ideal: a user's guide for software process improvement. Technical report, CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mechanic D (1963) The power to resist change among low-ranking personnel. Personnel Administration 26, 5–11.
Meissonier R and Houzé E (2010) Toward an ‘IT conflict-resistance theory’: action research during IT pre-implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 19 (5), 540–561.
Mintzberg H (1983) Power In and Around Organizations. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Mustonen-Ollila E and Lyytinen K (2004) How organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 13 (1), 35–51.
Ngwenyama O and Nielsen PA (2003) Competing values in software process improvement: an assumption analysis of CMM from an organizational culture perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 (1), 100–112.
Ngwenyama O and Nørbjerg J (2010) Software process improvement with weak management support: an analysis of the dynamics of intra-organizational alliances in IS change initiatives. European Journal of Information Systems 19 (3), 303–319.
Nielsen PA and Ngwenyama O (2002) Organizational influence processes in software process improvement. In Proceedings of the XTH European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2002) (Wrycza S, Ed), University Gdansk, Poland.
Nielsen PA and Nørbjerg J (2001) Assessing software processes: low maturity or sensible practice. Scandinavia Journal of Information Systems 13 (1–2), 23–36.
Oke A, Munshi N and Walumbwa FO (2009) The Influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics 38 (1), 64–72.
Osei-Bryson K-M and Ngwenyama O (2011) Using decision tree modelling to support Peircian abduction in IS research: a systematic approach for generating and evaluating hypotheses for systematic theory development. Information Systems Journal 21 (5), 407–440.
Paulk MC, Curtis B and Chrissis MB (1993) Capability maturity model for software v. 1.1. Technical report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-024, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organization Science 1 (3), 267–292.
Pettigrew AM (1997) What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management 13 (4), 337–348.
Pfeffer J (1992) Understanding power in organizations. California Management Review 34 (2), 29–50.
Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW (2003a) Influence, power, and politics in organizational settings. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 3–13, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW (2003b) Lateral influence. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), pp 275–281, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Pries-Heje J, Nørbjerg J, Aaen I and Elisberg T (2008) The road to high maturity: how the first Danish company reached CMMI level 5 in 100 months. In Software Processes & Knowledge (Nielsen PA and Kautz K, Eds), pp 163–191, Software Innovation Publisher, Aalborg.
Reichertz J (2007) Abduction: the logic of discovery of grounded theory. In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Bryant A and Charmaz K Eds), pp 214–228, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. The academy of management review 22 (4), 887–910.
Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A and Chowa C (2006) Information system success: individual and organizational determinants. Management Science 52 (12), 1849–1864.
Salancik GR and Pfeffer J (1977) Who gets power – and how they hold on to it. Organizational Dynamics 5 (3), 3–21.
Schriesheim CA and Hinkin TR (1990) Influence tactics used by subordinates: a theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson Subscales. Journal of applied psychology 75 (3), 246–257.
Schutz A (1963) Common sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In Philosophy of The Social Sciences (Natahson MA, Ed), pp 302–346, Random House, New York.
Shea CM and Howell JM (1999) Charismatic leadership and task feedback: a laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance. The Leadership Quarterly 10 (3), 375–396.
Sparrowe R, Liden R, Wayne S and Kraimer M (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. The Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 316–325.
Stone B (1997) Confronting Company Politics. Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke.
Thompson KR and Luthans F (2003) A behavioral interpretation of power. In Organizational Influence Processes (Porter LW, Angle HL and Allen RW, Eds), M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Thong JYL, Yap CS and Raman KS (1996) Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Information Systems Research 7 (2), 248.
Tursman R (1987) Peirce's Theory of Scientific Discovery. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis.
Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in is research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1), 74–81.
Wangenheim CG, Weber S, Hauck J and Trentin G (2006) Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Information and Software Technology 48 (9), 890–900.
Yukl G and Falbe CM (1990) Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (2), 132–140.
Yukl G and Falbe CM (1991) Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (3), 416.
Yukl G, Falbe CM and Youn JY (1993) Patterns of influence behavior for managers. Group & Organization Management 18 (1), 5.
Yukl G and Tracey JB (1992) Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (4), 525.
Zaheer A, Mcevily B and Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of inter-organizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organizational science 9 (2), 141–159.
Zaleznik A (1997) Real work. Harvard Business Review 75 (6), 53–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The iterative coding resulted in 112 quotations (refined from 142 initial quotations). Each quotation, q, is associated with at least one code, c (see Section ‘Research Methodology’ for details). The Table A1 shows the set of codes {c} along with their frequencies (F) and definitions.
The Table A2 displays the number of co-occurrences of each pair of codes in all documents. Each cell represents a code pair and also displays a normalized coefficient along with the count, which should vary between 0 (codes do not co-occur) and 1 (codes co-occur wherever they are used). The co-occurrence index (Garcia, 2006) accounts for the occurrence count of each code,
where F is the frequency of a code occurring on quotations – F(a), for example, measures how often the code a occurs, and F(a and b) measures how often both a and b occur on the same quotation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ngwenyama, O., Nielsen, P. Using organizational influence processes to overcome IS implementation barriers: lessons from a longitudinal case study of SPI implementation. Eur J Inf Syst 23, 205–222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.56
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.56