For AuthorsFor SubscribersFor LibrariansFor SocietiesFor Advertisers

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | FAQs

journal home
 
Services for Readers
Services for authors
Customer Services


Spring 2004, Volume 1, Number 1, Pages 62-68
Table of contents   Previous  Full text  Next   PDF
Article
Strategy after modernism: recovering practice
Richard Whittington1

1Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to: R Whittington, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. E-mail: Richard.Whittington@sbs.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

This article identifies an opportunity for European researchers to develop a more practice-sensitive research programme for strategy 'after modernism'. Strategy's intellectual lock-in on modernist detachment and economic theory can now be relaxed. Strategy can draw also on the rich resources of sociology to engage more directly with strategy as a social practice. This article outlines elements of a double agenda for strategy research after modernism: first, a sociological agenda concerned with understanding strategy's elites, its skills and its technologies, and their implications for society as a whole; second, a managerial agenda, turning this sociological understanding to practical advantage in terms of how managers become strategists, how strategy skills are acquired and how strategy technologies can be better designed and used. The article considers implications for research methods and the Mintzbergian tradition in strategy.

European Management Review (2004) 1, 62-68, advance online publication, 5 March 2004 doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500006

Keywords

strategy; practice; modernism; post-modernism

Received 10 December 2003; revised 10 January 2004; accepted 17 January 2004; published online 5 March 2004
Table of contents   Previous  Full text  Next   PDF