Comment
European Management Review (2008) 5, 23–26. doi:10.1057/emr.2008.5
A new financial capitalism? Explaining the persistence of exit over voice in contemporary corporate governance
Gregory Jackson1
1King's College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Gregory Jackson, Department of Management, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SEI 9NH, UK. E-mail: gregory.2.jackson@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
The article 'A New Finance Capitalism?' raises an important paradox. Institutional investors are growing in size and the concentration of their stakes gives them potential influence over managers. Yet we observe an unexpected absence of shareholder activism and voice on the part of institutional investors in contemporary America. Concentration occurs without commitment. This comment further explores some reasons why today's largest investors seem resigned to or even to benefit from their relative passivity and preference of exit over voice. These reasons include conflicts of interest, market failures, lack of organizational capabilities, use of informal voice, and dependence of markets for corporate control. Corporate governance scholars have surprisingly little evidence on these topics, which suggest an important agenda for future research.
Keywords:
corporate governance, market for corporate control, takeovers, sociology of finance, institutional investors, shareholder activism
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
A new financial capitalism? Explaining the persistence of exit over voice in contemporary corporate governanceEuropean Management Review Article
A new finance capitalism? Mutual funds and ownership re-concentration in the United StatesEuropean Management Review Article
Small states, international pressures, and interlocking directorates: the cases of Switzerland and the NetherlandsEuropean Management Review Article
The Process and Impact of Privatization in Russia and UkraineComparative Economic Studies Article

