TABLE 3
FROM:
Comparing small world statistics over time and across countries: an introduction to the special issue comparative and transnational corporate networks
Bruce Kogut and Mariano Belinky
BACK TO ARTICLETable 3. Ownership ties among firms, 1990 panel
| Country | Sample year | Number of nodes | Number of links | % of nodes in giant component | Density | Clustering coefficient | Average path length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1993 | 327 | 1351 | 73.4 | 0.025 | 0.85 | 3.1 |
| Sweden | 1990 | 227 | 10,502 | 98.2 | 0.409 | 0.86 | 1.7 |
| Denmark | 1990 | 119 | 1929 | 70.6 | 0.275 | 0.90 | 1.4 |
| Norway | 1990 | 34 | 73 | 76.5 | 0.13 | 0.75 | 2.0 |
| Switzerland | 1996 | 34 | 94 | 64.7 | 0.168 | 0.84 | 1.6 |
| The Netherlands | 1997 | 1221 | 13,415 | 60.4 | 0.018 | 0.90 | 2.3 |
This panel is defined for ownership links among firms for the first panel. These links are derived as the one-mode projection from the bipartite graph of owners and firms. This projection means that the nodes are firms and the links indicate that two firms share a common owner. The definitions are otherwise the same as above.