TABLE 8
FROM:
Comparing small world statistics over time and across countries: an introduction to the special issue comparative and transnational corporate networks
Bruce Kogut and Mariano Belinky
BACK TO ARTICLETable 8. Ownership, 2000
| Country | Average path length | Clustering coefficient | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Random | Robins randomization | Newman–Strogatz–Watts estimates | Actual | Random | Robins randomization | Newman–Strogatz–Watts estimates | |
| Germany | 2.7 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 0.86 | 0.030 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
| Sweden | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 0.78 | 0.276 | 0.31 | 0.37 |
| Denmark | 2.0 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 0.89 | 0.084 | 0.49 | 0.74 |
| Norway | 2.4 | 2.3 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 0.70 | 0.039 | 0.32 | 0.58 |
| Switzerland | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 0.78 | 0.032 | 0.42 | 0.55 |
| The Netherlands | 2.0 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 0.90 | 0.013 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
This table summarizes the statistics for the ownership network for the second panel.
