Comment
European Management Review (2008) 5, 209–214. doi:10.1057/emr.2008.21
The rankings game: Reflections on Devinney, Dowling and Perm-Ajchariyawong
Anthony G Hopwood1
1Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, UK
Correspondence: Anthony G Hopwood, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, UK.
Abstract
Commenting on an analysis of the Financial Times MBA rankings, consideration is given to the emergence of an interest in such institutional rankings and the variety of factors involved in their present prominence. Specific attention is given to the pressures for business schools to manipulate the rankings and some of the forms that this takes. Although rankings are likely to remain a feature of the MBA environment for the foreseeable future, consideration is nevertheless given to alternative ways of providing potential MBA students with more useful sources of information.
Keywords:
MBA, rankings, manipulations, business schools, Financial Times
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
The rankings game: Reflections on Devinney, Dowling and Perm-AjchariyawongEuropean Management Review Article
The Financial Times business schools ranking: What quality is this signal of quality?European Management Review Article
Reputation Beyond the Rankings: A Conceptual Framework for Business School ResearchCorporate Reputation Review Original Article
Measuring the Reputation of Top US Business Schools: A MIMIC Modeling ApproachCorporate Reputation Review Original Article
Right signals to applicants, wrong incentives for deans: business school rankings and the challenges to management educationEuropean Management Review Article
See all 6 matches for Research


