Skip to main content
Log in

Europe and America: Still Worlds Apart on the International Criminal Court

  • Symposium
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transatlantic crisis of 2003 was not only about the Iraq War. It concerned a range of foreign policy issues, as well as commitments to multilateralism and security institutions more broadly. The dispute over the International Criminal Court (ICC), for example, was frequently cited as evidence of a transatlantic rupture or a growing gap between Europe and America. The US proved deeply ambivalent about the idea of a permanent court with independent powers and weary about limiting its own foreign policy maneuverability. The European debate, while internally fragmented, generally supported a Court that mirrored its own structures, cut across power politics and extended a legal regime internationally. Barack Obama's election brought a new wave of optimism in transatlantic relations as many expected his foreign policies would be more aligned with European priorities. The tone improved decidedly in 2009, and because of political and humanitarian crises in Sudan the US prepared itself to engage constructively with the ICC. Nevertheless, as this article demonstrates, the US and Europe are still worlds apart on the ICC and the international legal order that it represents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Personal communication with David Scheffer, Chicago, USA, 21 September 21 2006.

  2. A coalition of more than sixty ‘like-minded’ states from Africa, North and South America, Asia, Western and Eastern Europe, and Oceania drove the ICC negotiating process to its successful conclusion. See the Human Rights Watch World Report (1999).

  3. The other three cases include Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Central African Republic.

  4. The task force was run by the American Society of International Law and the report, ‘US Policy toward the International Criminal Court: Furthering Positive Engagement’ (March 2009) is available at: http://www.asil.org/files/ASIL-08-DiscPaper2.pdf.

References

  • Abramowitz, M. and Lynch, C. (2008) ‘Darfur killings soften bush's opposition to the international court’, The Washington Post, 12 October.

  • Abramowitz, M. and Parke, N. (2009) ‘Bashing Bashir’, The National Interest, 24 March.

  • Arieff, A., Margesson, R. and Browne, M.A. (2008) ‘International Criminal Court cases in Africa: Status and policy issues’, CRS Report for Congress, 12 September.

  • Carpenter, T. (2003) ‘The bush administration's security strategy: Implications for transatlantic relations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 16 (3): 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (2005) ‘Beyond the west: Terrors in transatlantia’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, I. (2001) ‘Are the United States heading for divorce?’ International Affairs 77 (3): 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Security Strategy (ESS). (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World, Brussels: European Security Strategy.

  • Hyde-Price, A. (2006) ‘Continental drift: Transatlantic relations and American unipolarity’, Paper presented at the BISA Conference, University College Cork, 18–20 December.

  • Laurenti, J. (2009),‘ICC arrest warrant in Sudan may force Obama's hand’, Maxims News Network, 4 March, www.maximsnews.com.

  • McKeeby, D. (2009) ‘Obama dispatches special envoy to Sudan’, www.america.gov, 31 March.

  • Obama, B. (2007) ‘Renewing American leadership’, Foreign Affairs 86 (4): 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S.M. and Brown, K. (2009) ‘Stopping Bashir: Obama's “never again” moment of truth’, Council on Foreign Relations Expert Brief, 23 March.

  • Pouliot, V. (2006) ‘The alive and well transatlantic security community: A theoretical reply to Michael Cox’, European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, J. (2002) ‘Worlds apart on international justice’, Lieden Journal of International Law 15: 835–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2004) ‘Beyond Iraq: The Crisis of the Transatlantic Security Community’, in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds.) American Power in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 214–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, W. (2004) An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, D.J. (2002) ‘Staying the course with the International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal 35: 47–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M. and MacFarquhar, N. (2009) ‘Court issues arrest warrant for Sudan's leader’, New York Times, 4 March.

  • Transatlantic Trends. (2009) Published by the German Marshall Fund of the US and the Compagnia di San Paolo, www.transatlantictrends.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronsson, L. Europe and America: Still Worlds Apart on the International Criminal Court. Eur Polit Sci 10, 3–10 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.68

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.68

Keywords

Navigation