Skip to main content
Log in

Trying to Learn (Politics) in a Data-Drenched Society: Can Information Literacy Save Us?

  • Teaching and Training
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We live in an era described as ‘fast-paced, fragmented, and data-drenched’. This article will state the case that a superabundance of information, particularly through the internet, is influencing the manner in which individuals learn, and this is creating problems. In particular, there is evidence that many people are accepting information without critical examination, with Donald Leu's study into students’ willingness to accept the existence of the Pacific Northwest ‘tree octopus’ as a celebrated example. Original research at Cardiff University suggests that Politics students are not immune. The concept most associated with attempts to address these problems is information literacy, but this article raises, again, the question whether this concept has become too ‘stretched’ to fulfil the task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When checking on 1 February 2011, this was the first definition of information literacy to be found on Wikipedia's page about the concept: I am aware of the irony of using that particular source to gauge influence in the context of this particular article!

References

  • Albrecht, R. and Baron, S. (2002) ‘The politics of pedagogy: Expectations and reality for information literacy in librarianship’, Journal of Library Administration 36 (1/2): 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Library Association. (1989) Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report, Chicago: American Library Association, Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm, accessed 13 November 2010.

  • Andretta, S. (2005) Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide, Oxford: Chandos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andretta, S. (2009) ‘The multifaceted nature of information literacy: Solving the Rubik cube puzzle’, Journal of Information Literacy 3 (2): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. (2011) ‘Fake “tree octopus” exposes risks of internet reliance’, International Business Times. Available at: http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/109263/20110206/internet-students-university-research-octopus-connecticut.htm, accessed 24 February 2011.

  • Brabazon, T. (2007) The University of Google: Education in the (post) Information Age, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., Edwards, S. and Lupton, M. (2006) ‘Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationship between theory and practice’, Innovations in Teaching and Learning Information and Computer Science 5 (1): 1–18; Available at: http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/italics/vol5-1/pdf/sixframes_final%20_1_.pdf, accessed 6 March 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2008) ‘Is Google making us stupid?’, The Atlantic (July/August): Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/toc/2008/07/, accessed 6 January 2010.

  • Carr, N. (2010) The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, New York: W.W Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIBER (Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research, UCL). (2008) ‘Information behaviour of the researcher of the future’, Available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf, accessed 5 January 2009.

  • Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience (CLEX). (2009) Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World, Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/heweb20rptv1.pdf, accessed 6 September 2009.

  • Eisenberg, M. (2010) ‘Professor Michael Eisenberg talks critical thinking today’, HowDo.Us Interview with Mike Eisenberg, Co-Director and Co-PI of Project Information Literacy, Professor and Dean Emeritus, University of Washington Information School, March 2010. Available at: http://howdous.typepad.com/blog/2010/03/professor-michael-eisenberg-talks-critical-thinking-today.html, accessed 14 May 2010.

  • Elmborg, J. (2006) ‘Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice’, Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (2): 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, A. and Eisenberg, M. (2009) ‘Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age’, Project Information Literacy Report, University of Washington. Available at: http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_Year1Report_12_2009.pdf, accessed 8 March 2010.

  • Hepworth, M. and Walton, G. (2009) Teaching Information Literacy for Inquiry-based Learning, Oxford: Chandos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapitzke, C. (2003) ‘Information literacy: A positivist epistemology and a politics of outformation’, Educational Theory 53 (1): 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoun, J. (1998) ‘Teaching undergraduates WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction’, C&RL News, (July–August): 522–523.

  • Lloyd, A. (2010) ‘Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory’, Journal of Documentation 66 (2): 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Ansah, E. (2003) ‘Information literacy and the academic library: A critical look at the concept and the controversies surrounding it’, Journal of Academic Librarianship 29 (4): 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prague Declaration. (2003) ‘Towards an information literate society’, Available at: http://www.infolit.org/2003.htmlb, accessed 2 February 2011.

  • Sartori, G. (2008) ‘Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics’, in D. Collier and J. Gerring (eds.) Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, London: Routledge, pp. 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snavely, L. and Cooper, N. (1997) ‘The information literacy debate’, The Journal of Academic Librarianship 23 (1): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. and Campbell, P. (2007) ‘The Politics of Information Literacy: Integrating Information Literacy into the Political Science Curriculum’, in T. Jacobson and T. Mackey (eds.) Information Literacy Collaborations that Work, New York: Neal-Schuman, pp. 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. (2010) ‘From “scuba diving” to “jet ski-ing”? Information behavior, political science, and the Google generation’, Journal of Political Science Education 6 (4): 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, A. (2009) Information Obesity, Oxford: Chandos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on the paper ‘Information Literacy: Where Next?’, delivered at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh University, 31 March 2010. Thanks to the audience there, to the anonymous referees, and the editors of EPS (not least for alerting me to the Northwest Pacific tree octopus).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thornton, S. Trying to Learn (Politics) in a Data-Drenched Society: Can Information Literacy Save Us?. Eur Polit Sci 11, 213–223 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.20

Keywords

Navigation