Abstract
In political research and everyday politics, Finland is often presented as one of the gender-equal countries. The Nordic countries, Finland included, top a number of gender equality indices indicating that women’s societal position is particularly advanced. Feminist research, however, seeks to highlight the issue specificity of such evaluations. While Finland comes out on top in terms of a number of indicators, there are other areas where Finland is a laggard. Gender equality in the Academy is a case point. About a quarter of professors are women in Finland but their numbers fluctuate a lot from one discipline to another. Political science has traditionally been very male dominated, and the notion of politics is perceived as masculine. This article provides a brief overview of the current status of women in political science in Finland. It revisits earlier findings about how political science as a discipline is gendered in Finland and evaluates their pertinence today. The article then discusses the current situation and evaluates the changed institutional context. Despite progress made in numbers, gender continues to shape the political science discipline in Finland.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This article draws upon a larger research project carried out in 2004–2005 that focused upon undergraduate and postgraduate students as well as the staff (Kantola, 2005). The project included data about the miniscule numbers of women in the department over time, a survey of Ph.D. students, interview data with students, Ph.D. students and staff, and documents about recruitment processes and political science curricula.
References
Acker, J. (1992) ‘Gendering Organizational Theory’, in A.J. Mills and P. Tancred (eds.) Gendering Organizational Analysis, Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: Sage, pp. 248–260.
Ahmed, S. (2007) ‘You end up doing a document rather than doing the doing: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (4): 590–609.
Bagilhole, B. and Goode, J. (2001) ‘The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation’, The European Journal of Women’s Studies 8 (2): 161–180.
Berndtson, E. (2007) ‘The Current State of Political Science in Finland’, in H.-D. Klingemann (ed.) The State of Political Science in Western Europe, Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 103–36.
Berndtson, E. (2008) ‘Political Science in Finland. A discipline in troubled waters’, paper presented in the IPSA Conference on International Political Science: New Theoretical and Regional Perspectives, April 30 – 2 May 2008, Montreal, Canada.
Brunila, K. (2009) Parasta ennen. Tasa-arvotyön projektitapaistuminen, Kasvatustieteenlaitoksen tutkimuksia 222, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Curtin, J. (2013) ‘Women and political science in New Zealand: The state of the discipline’, Political Science 65 (1): 63–83.
EIGE. (2013) Gender Equality Index Report, Vilnus: European Institute for Gender Equality.
Ikävalko, E. (2013) ‘Tasa-arvotaitoja työelämään? Opiskelijat ja oppilaitosten toiminnallinen tasa-arvosuunnittelu’, in K. Brunila, K. Hakala, E. Lahelma and A. Teittinen (eds.) Ammatillinen koulutus ja yhteiskunnalliset eronteot, Helsinki: Gaudeamus, pp. 63–86.
Ikävalko, E. and Brunila, K. (2011) ‘Tasa-arvosuunnittelu managerialistisen hallinnan Tekniikkana’, Sosiologia 48 (4): 323–337.
Husu, L. (2001) ‘Sexism, Support and Survival. Academic Women and Hidden Discrimination in Finland’, Social Psychological Studies 6, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Kantola, J. (2005) Mykät, kuurot ja kadotetut: Sukupuolten välinen tasa-arvo Helsingin yliopiston valtio-opin laitoksella, Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Kantola, J. (2006) Feminists Theorize the State, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kantola, J. (2008) ‘Why do all the women disappear? Gendering processes in a political science department’, Gender, Work & Organization 15 (2): 202–225.
Kantola, J. (2010) Gender and the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kantola, J. and Squires, J. (2012) ‘From state feminism to market feminism?’ International Political Science Review 30 (4): 382–400.
Kantola, J., Nousiainen, K. and Saari, M. (eds.) (2012) Tasa-arvo toisin nähtynä. Oikeuden ja politiikan näkökulmia tasa-arvoon ja yhdenvertaisuuteen, Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Keränen, M. (1993) Modern Political Science and Gender: A Debate between the Deaf and the Mute, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Klingemann, H. (ed.) (2007) The State of Political Science in Western Europe, Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Naskali, P. (2004) ’Eihän meillä ole mitään ongelmia’: Henkilökunnan ja opiskelijoiden kokemuksia tasa-arvon ja yhdenmukaisuuden toteutumisesta Lapin yliopistossa, Lapin yliopiston hallinnon julkaisuja 43, Rovaniemi.
Saari, M. (2012) ‘Sukupuolinäkökulman valtavirtaistaminen tasa-arvopolitiikan strategiana’, in J. Kantola, K. Nousiainen and M. Saari (eds.) Tasa-arvo toisin nähtynä. Oikeuden ja politiikan näkökulmia tasa-arvoon ja yhdenvertaisuuteen, Helsinki: Gaudeamus, pp. 175–197.
Valkeapää, A. (ed.) (2011) Valtiotieteellisen tiedekunnan tasa-arvo- ja yhdenvertaisuusselvitys 2010–2011, Helsinki: Faculty of Social Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
kantola, j. political science as a gendered discipline in finland. Eur Polit Sci 14, 79–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.4