Symposium: Why European Political Science is so Unproductive and What should be done about it
European Political Science (2007) 6, 177–184. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210127
career incentives
Katharina Holzingera
aDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science, Hamburg University, Allende-Platz 1, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: holzinger@sozialwiss.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
Research productivity in terms of publications in international journals varies greatly across European countries. Language and country size have been discussed as factors responsible for this. However, institutional factors may be more important. The contribution analyses the institutions shaping three typical stages of career development in research: the Ph.D. phase, the post-doc phase and professorship. The incentives for publication provided by two institutional systems are compared: the Anglo-Saxon type, represented by the UK, and the continental type, represented by Germany. The author concludes that the Anglo-Saxon system has advantages over the continental European system at all three stages of a career.
Keywords:
research productivity, publication incentives, career stages, recruitment, research evaluation
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
career incentivesEuropean Political Science Original Article
The Battle over Professorship: Reform of Human Resource Management and Academic Careers in a Comparative PerspectiveHigher Education Policy Article
The Way We Work NowEuropean Political Science Original Article
The PhD in the US: Criticisms, Facts, and RemediesHigher Education Policy Article
See all 6 matches for Research


