The Profession
European Political Science (2007) 6, 315–321. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210145
two perspectives on EU research funding: the present is lacklustre, the future is potentially shining
Klaus Armingeona
aDepartment of Political Science, University of Berne, Lerchenweg 36, Berne 9 CH-3000, Switzerland. E-mail: Klaus.armingeon@ipw.unibe.ch
Abstract
This commentary is in response to the European Union's (EU's) 7th framework programme (FP7). It sets out the major elements of FP7 and discusses the pros and cons of the EU's activity in the field of research funding. The main argument is that the EU's activities have grown in size. They can and should no longer be ignored by political scientists when looking for research money. The commentary enumerates some arguments regarding why the EU programmes may be better, or may become better in the future, than the usually critical accounts of the EU research system suggest.
Keywords:
EU, framework programmes, European Research Council
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
two perspectives on EU research funding: the present is lacklustre, the future is potentially shiningEuropean Political Science Original Article
the search for the holy grant: (mis)allocating money in european political scienceEuropean Political Science Original Article
More than a Regulatory State: Bringing Expenditure (Back) into EU ResearchComparative European Politics Original Article
Beyond Conditionality? Regions from the New EU Member States and their Activities in BrusselsComparative European Politics Article
See all 11 matches for Research


