Abstract
Member-states' ideas and discourse about the European Union's (EU's) ‘liberal project’ vary over whether they envision the EU project as mainly about market, community, rights, or global action. Can these be reconciled? Perhaps, but only if the EU itself is reconceptualised as a ‘regional state’ made up of overlapping policy communities, and reformed to allow graduated membership. This could facilitate enlargement in the periphery plus closer cooperation for an inner core, with democracy enhanced by allowing all members an institutional voice in the areas in which they participate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartolini, S. (2005) Re-Structuring Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fabbrini, S. (2007) Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe are Becoming Similar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrera, M. (2005) The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Howorth, J. (2007) European Security and Defense Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Laïdi, Z. (2008) EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative Power and Social Preferences, London: Routledge.
Leonard, M. (2005) Why Europe will Run the 21st Century, London: Fourth Estate.
Mair, P. (2006) ‘Political Parties and Party Systems’, in P. Graziano and M. Vink (eds.) Europeanization: New Research Agendas, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 303–327.
Majone, G. (1998) ‘Europe's democratic deficit’, European Law Journal 4 (1): 5–28.
Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.
Reich, N. (2008) ‘Free movement v. social rights in an enlarged union: the Laval and Viking cases before the ECJ’, German Law Journal 9 (2): 125–161.
Scharpf, F. (1988) ‘The joint decision trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration 66 (3): 239–278.
Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf, F. (2007) ‘Reflections on multi-level legitimacy’, Speech to the European Union Studies Association, EUSA Newsletter 30 (3): 2–11.
Schmidt, V.A. (2004) ‘The European union: democratic legitimacy in a regional state?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (4): 975–999.
Schmidt, V.A. (2006a) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V.A. (2006b) ‘Adapting to Europe: is it harder for Britain?’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8: 15–33.
Schmidt, V.A. (2007) ‘Trapped by their ideas: French elites’ discourses of European integration and globalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 992–1009.
Sjursen, H. (2007) ‘Enlargement in perspective: EU identity in perspective’, Recon Online Working Paper 2007/15, www.reconproject.eu/projectweb/portalproject/RECONWorkingPapers.html.
Telò, M. (2007) Europe: A Civilian Power? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Acknowledgements
I thank Daniela Caruso and Fritz Scharpf for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, V. Envisioning a Less Fragile, More Liberal Europe. Eur Polit Sci 8, 212–224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.28
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.28