Skip to main content
Log in

Are Quantitative Research Methods to Blame for a Growing Irrelevance of Political Science? A Rejoinder to John Trent

  • Debate
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Is political science out of step with the world?’ This question, raised by John E. Trent in a recent issue, is part of a recurring debate about the development of our discipline. In that article, and in a subsequent book with his colleague Michael Stein, John Trent blames adherents of the ‘scientific method’ for political science’s growing irrelevance. We challenge this claim by arguing that Trent falls back on outdated polarities between ‘objective and normative’, and ‘explanation and interpretation’, in order to justify his allegation. We argue for the need to review our methods continuously, rather than dig up a fruitless and biased division between qualitative and quantitative approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreski, S. (1974) Social Sciences as Sorcery, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, J. (2006) ‘Preface: The Edge Question’, in J. Brockmann (ed.) What We Believe but Cannot Prove. Today’s Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty, New York: Harper Perennial, pp. ix–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, B. (2003) A Short History of Nearly Everything, London: Transworld Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (2008) Revolutions in Development Inquiry, London, Earthscan, www.earthscan.co.uk.

  • Ciaffa, J.A. (1998) Max Weber and the Problems of Value-Free Social Science: A Critical Examination of the Werturteilsstreit, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W.E. (2011) ‘Complexity and relevance’, European Political Science 10 (2): 210–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisfeld, R. (2011) ‘How political science might regain relevance and obtain an audience: A manifesto for the 21st century’, European Political Science 10 (2): 220–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisfeld, R. (2012) ‘From specialization to teamwork: IPSA research committees and current challenges to the discipline of political science’, Montreal’, Participation (Newsletter of the International Political Science Association) 36 (1): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Globe and Mail. (7 October 2012) ‘Folio: Higher Education: Who Universities Need Now’, 20 November 2012; ‘The Separate and Equal University’, 12 October 2012; ‘The Tricky Business of Funding a University’, 18 October 2012; ‘Folio: Post-Secondary Coordination: What Canada Needs: A National Strategy for Students’, 20 October 2012.

  • Kaase, M. (2011) ‘Should political science be more relevant? A comment on the paper by John E. Trent’, European Political Science 10 (2): 226–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, A., Lehnert, M., Miller, B. and Sieberer, U. (2002) ‘The democratic quality of institutional regimes: A conceptual framework’, Political Studies 50 (2): 313–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaina, V. and Kuhn, S. (2014) ‘Are quantitative methods to blame for a growing irrelevance of political science? A rejoinder to John Trent’, European Political Science, advance online publication: 21 February, doi: 10.1057/eps.2013.48.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. (1992) Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (1984/2007) From Knowledge to Wisdom: A Revolution for Science and the Humanities, Oxford: Pentire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Post. (2012) ‘Exporting Education: Canada has barely tapped world demand for higher education’, 7 November.

  • New York Times. (2012) College of Future Could be Come One, Come All: Virtual U. Testing Online Learning, 20 November.

  • Opp, K.-D. (2005) Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Einführung in Probleme Ihrer Theorienbildung Und Praktischen Anwendung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, G. (2009) Crippling Epistemologies and Governance Failures, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, D.M. (1984) The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, K. (1994) Politik. Begriffe und Wirklichkeiten: eine Einführung in Das Politische Denken, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (2004) ‘Where is political science going?’, Political Science 11: 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (2012) ‘Is There a Genuinely International Political Science Discipline? An Overview and Assessment of Recent Views on Disciplinary Historical Trends’, in J.E. Trent and M. Stein (eds.) The World of Political Science: A Critical Overview of the Development of Political Science Around the Globe 1990–2012, Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich, pp. 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. and John, P. (2009) ‘Design experiments: Engaging policy-makers in the search for evidence about their work’, Political Studies 57: 356–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2010) ‘Blockages on the road to relevance: Why has political science failed to deliver’, European Political Science 2010 (9): S72–S84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. (2011) ‘Should political science be more relevant? An empirical and critical analysis of the discipline’, European Political Science 10 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. and Stein, M. (eds.) (2012) The World of Political Science: A Critical Overview of the Development of Political Science Around the Globe 1990–2012, Leverkusen: Budrich, Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. (2012a) ‘Issues and Trends in Political Science at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Perspectives from the World of Political Science Book Series’, in J.E. Trent and M. Stein (eds.) The World of Political Science: A Critical Overview of the Development of Political Science Around the Globe 1990–2012, Leverkusen: Budrich, Barbara, pp. 91–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. (2012b) ‘An Essay on the Present and Future of Political Studies 2012’, in J.E. Trent and M. Stein (eds.) The World of Political Science: A Critical Overview of the Development of Political Science Around the Globe 1990–2012, Leverkusen: Budrich, Barbara, pp. 155–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. (2011) ‘Should political science be more relevant? An empirical and critical analysis of the discipline’, European Political Science 10 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J.E. (2012) The World of Political Science: A Critical Overview of the Development of Political Studies around the Globe: 1990–2012, Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westle, B. (2009) ‘Einleitung’, in B. Westle (ed.) Methoden Der Politikwissenschaft, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T.G. (2009) ‘What happened to the idea of world government?’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 253–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

kaina, v., kuhn, s. & trent, j. Are Quantitative Research Methods to Blame for a Growing Irrelevance of Political Science? A Rejoinder to John Trent. Eur Polit Sci 13, 201–216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2013.48

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2013.48

Keywords

Navigation