Data, Measures and Methods

French Politics (2005) 3, 88–91. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200068

Analyzing Quota Sample Data and the Peer-review Process

Thomas Gschwenda

aMannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES), University of Mannheim, 68131 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: Thomas.Gschwend@mzes.uni-mannheim.de

Top

Abstract

There is no random sampling in France. Thus, when analyzing French survey data, every scholar has to deal with an important methodological challenge: How can one use the standard panoply of significance tests on quota sample data? This essay suggests some strategies for successfully dealing with such enquiries during the peer-review process. Scholars should gather as much external evidence as possible to argue that their achieved sample represents the population on as many dimensions as possible. The more evidence they are able to compile, the more confidence there is that their estimation results are robust even based on quota sample data.

Keywords:

survey research, significance testing, simple random sample, quota sample, French public opinion

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT
Palgrave Connect