Original Article
French Politics (2009) 7, 75–95. doi:10.1057/fp.2009.7
Agenda-setting dynamics in France: Revisiting the 'partisan hypothesis'
Frank Baumgartnera, Sylvain Brouardb and Emiliano Grossmanc
- aThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3265. E-mail: Frankb@unc.edu
- bSciences Po Bordeaux, 11 allée Ausone, Domaine universitaire, 33607 Pessac Cedex, France
- cSciences Po Paris, 98, rue de l'Université, 75007 Paris, France. E-mail: emiliano.grossman@sciences-po.fr
Correspondence: Sylvain Brouard, E-mail: s.brouard@sciencespobordeaux.fr
Abstract
This paper presents an original way of testing the 'partisan hypothesis'. Building on the substantial literature on the party-policy link, we test this link with respect to issue attention, rather than spending or macroeconomic outcomes. We examine the evolution of issue attention through the systematic analysis of agenda setting of three major French political institutions: the President, the government and the National Assembly. Although our results point to partisan differentiation on some issues, the overall conclusion is that partisan differentiation is at best one factor of variation among others.
Keywords:
agenda-setting, France, issue attention, political parties, presidency, law-making
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Agenda-setting dynamics in France: Revisiting the ?partisan hypothesis?French Politics Original Article
?New? Politics for ?Old?? Value Change and the Voter?Party Relationship in FranceFrench Politics Research Article
Insurgency Campaigns and the Quest for Popular Democracy: Theodore Roosevelt, Eugene McCarthy, and Party Monopolies *Polity Article
How Useful is the Cumul des Mandats for Being Re-elected? Empirical Evidence from the 1997 French Legislative ElectionsFrench Politics Article
See all 42 matches for Research


