Skip to main content
Log in

feminist research and activism on violence against women: linking the local and the global

  • Local/Global Interrogations Panel
  • Published:
Feminist Review

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. This included both Serbian and Croatian feminists.

  2. My example is not unique. As Blagojević noted, it was quite common that women who went through difficulties in their private life joined women's groups, and that their activism had a therapeutic effect (Blagojević, 1998: 22).

  3. As one battered woman said: ‘The war is nothing new for me, I have been living in war for years’ (Nikolić-Ristanović, 1996: 204).

  4. Of course at that time, I was not aware of this impact on myself. On the contrary, I felt powerless and wished to do something for so many of those suffering around me.

  5. This is in accordance with research on women's motivation for joining women's groups in Serbia during the war, which shows that during the 1990s three main motives for joining women's groups were: the need to understand and change social reality, their own victimization/negative experience and the wish to oppose the war and alleviate its consequences, that is, to help others (Blagojević, 1998: 21).

  6. At that time, the Women's Studies Centre was an NGO, and, although working under extremely difficult conditions, offered a unique alternative to mainstream and ideological studies.

  7. The Group for women's rights (Grupa za zenska prava) is the predecessor of the Victimology Society of Serbia (www.vds.org.rs).

  8. The most effective common actions of women's groups were those related to issues such as abortion, laws on rape, pornography and prostitution, which most easily united Western feminists as well (Bouchier, 1983: 106; Rowbotham, 1992: 74–76). Obviously, these actions were most effective in terms of preventing negative change or advocating for positive legal changes, since these are issues around which women's groups found a high level of agreement and interest for advocacy. This is not unusual since, as Fireman and Gamson (1979: 28) stressed, mobilization is more likely when collective action is more urgent, and ‘collective action is most urgent when there is no reason to believe that collective goods will be preserved without collective action’. This is exactly the kind of urgency that most easily united women in collective action when their rights were threatened by announced changes of laws in Serbia. The most recent example occurred in July 2009, when fifty-six organizations signalled their support for amendments to proposed legal changes relating to domestic violence.

  9. For more details on how precious was support sent to Serbia at that time, see Nikolić-Ristanović (2003).

  10. Feminist panels, meetings and other events that feminists from Western countries participated in have been organized in Belgrade on a regular basis since 1975 until 1992 when the war and international isolation of Serbia prevented them from continuing.

  11. VDS is a membership NGO that joins together female and male members, experts and activists to work for the benefit of victims of crime. It was established in 1997, and its main aim is to advocate for the rights of victims of crime, war and human rights violations in a gender sensitive way.

  12. Vesna Nikolić-Ristanović, Slobodanka Konstantinović-Vilić, Nevena Petrušić, Ivana Stevanović and Brankica Grupković.

  13. The New Model of Laws on Domestic Violence presents harmonized changes of five relevant laws: the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, family law, civil procedure law and the law on weapons and munitions.

References

  • Blagojević, M. (1998) Ka vidljivoj zenskoj istoriji (Toward Visible Women's History), Beograd: Centar za zenske studije, istrazivanja i komunikaciju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, D. (2003) ‘Reconciliation: an introduction’ in Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T. and Huyse, L. (2003) editors, Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: A Handbook, Stockholm: International IDEA, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchier, D. (1983) The Feminist Challenge, London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1994) ‘Making women's bodies battlefield’ in Stiglemayer, A. (1994) editor, Mass Rape: The War against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćetković, N. (1998) ‘SOS za zene i decu zrtve nasilja (SOS hotline for women and children)’ in Blagojević, M. (1998) editor, Ka vidljivoj zenskoj istoriji (Toward Visible Women's History), Beograd: Centar za zenske studije, istrazivanja i komunikaciju, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (2007) From Where We Stand: War, Women's Activism and Feminist Analyses, London; New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. and Hunter, L. (1999) editors, ‘Transversal politics’ Thematic Special issue of Soundings: Journal of Politics and Culture, No. 12.

  • Feminist Review (2004) ‘Post-communism: women's lives in transition’ edited by Nikolić-Ristanović, V.

  • Fireman, B. and Gamson, W. (1979) ‘Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective’ in Zald, M.N. and McCarthy, J.D. (1979) editors, The Dynamics of Social Movements, Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers, 8–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, M. (2007) Restorative justice: How it Works, London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladjenović, L. and Litricin, V. (1993) ‘Belgrade Feminists 1992: Separation guilt and identity crisis’ Feminist Review, Vol. 45: 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (1995) ‘Bez (smisao) kazne zatvora ili ka feministickoj analizi kazne (The (non) sense of the penalty of imprisonment or toward feminist analyses of penalty)’ Zenske studije, Vol. 2–3: 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (1996) ‘War and violence against women’ in Turpin, J. and Lorentzen, L. (1996) editors, The Gendered New World Order: Militarism, Development and the Environment, New York: Routledge, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (2000a) editor, Women, Violence and War, Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (2000b) Od zrtve do zatvorenice: nasilje u porodici i kriminalitet zena (From Victim to Prisoner: Domestic Violence and Women's Crime), Beograd: Viktimolosko drustvo Srbije, Institut za kriminoloska istrazivanja i Prometej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (2002) Social Change, Gender and Violence: Post-communist and War-affected Societies, Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (2003) ‘Refugee women in Serbia – invisible victims of war in the former Yugoslavia’ Feminist Review, Vol. 73: 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanovic, V (2006) ‘Truth and reconciliation in Serbia’ in Sullivan, D. and Tifft, L. (2006) editors, Handbook of Restorative Justice, Oxon: Taylor & Francis Books, 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. (2008) ‘Local conflicts and international interventions – victimization of civilians and possibilities for restorative global responses’ Contemporary Justice Review, Vol. 2: 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolić-Ristanović, V. and Ćopić, S. (2002) ‘Legal reforms regarding domestic violence in Serbia’ The Rights of Women Bulletin, Autumn, 23–27.

  • Rowbotham, S. (1992) Women in Movement: Feminism and Social Action, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1990) ‘Feminist approaches to criminology or postmodern woman meets atavistic men’ in Gelsthorpe, L. and Morris, A. (1990) editors, Feminist Perspectives in Criminology, Philadelphia: Open University Press, 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vušković, L. and Trivunac, S. (1998) ‘Feministička grupa Žena i društvo (Feminist group women and society)’ in Blagojević, M. (1998) editor, Ka vidljivoj ženskoj istoriji (Toward Visible Women's History), Beograd: Centar za ženske studije, istraživanja i komunikaciju, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldgrave, L. (2008) Restorative justice, Self-interest and Responsible Citizenship, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, I. (2003) ‘Victim-combatant dialogue in Northern Ireland’ in Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T. and Huyse, L. (2003) editors, Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: a Handbook, Stockholm: International IDEA, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1999) ‘What is transversal politics’ in Cockburn, C. and Hunter, L. (1999) editors, ‘Transversal Politics’, Thematic Special issue of Soundings: Journal of Politics and Culture, No. 12.

  • Zarkov, D. (1998) ‘War rapes in Bosnia: on masculinity, femininity and power of the rape victim identity’ Temida, Vol. 2: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was presented as part of Feminist Review's Conference celebrating thirty years of the journal. The ‘Feminist Theory & Activism in Global Perspective’ conference was held at SOAS, The University of London, on September 26, 2009.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikolić-Ristanović, V. feminist research and activism on violence against women: linking the local and the global. Fem Rev 98 (Suppl 1), e21–e35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.30

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.30

Navigation