Skip to main content
Log in

epistemology of ink: an unholy trinity; or, atheism, feminism and Blackness

  • Open Space
  • Published:
Feminist Review

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dillon, S., 2005. Reinscribing De Quincey’s palimpsest: the significance of the palimpsest in contemporary literary and cultural studies. Textual Practice, 19(3), pp. 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, H.L., 1983. The ‘Blackness of Blackness’: a critique of the sign and the signifying monkey. Critical Inquiry, 9(4), pp. 685–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, D.W., 2000. Working identity. Cornell Law Review, 85(5), pp. 1259–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, H.J., 1987. Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: an American grammar book. Diacritics, 17(2), pp. 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, R.M., 2007. Death of God theology. In T. Flynn, ed. The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bey, M. epistemology of ink: an unholy trinity; or, atheism, feminism and Blackness. Fem Rev 110, 75–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.17

Navigation