Article

Feminist Review (2003) 73, 6–18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400071

No borders: the case against immigration controls

Teresa Hayter

Top

Abstract

This article presents the case against immigration controls. Nation states, which are giving up controls on the movement of goods and capital, nevertheless still try to control the movement of people. Like controls under apartheid, immigration controls will eventually become untenable. They are also a relatively recent phenomenon. The actions of the governments of the rich countries, their international agencies and corporations increase both the opportunities and the need for migration. Together with arms sales and support for right-wing repressive regimes, they bear much responsibility for the wars and persecution from which people are forced to flee. The strongest reason for abolishing immigration controls is the increasingly harsh suffering they impose on refugees and migrants, largely to deter others. In the process, they undermine many human rights, including potentially those of existing residents.

Keywords:

asylum seekers, human rights, freedom of movement, frontiers

Extra navigation

.

FR resources

ADVERTISEMENT
Feminist Theory & Activism in Global Perspective
Link to Complete Online Archive
Power, movements, change - Development vol. 52 issue 2, June 2009
Sexuality and Development - Development Volume 54, Issue 2, March 2009
Postmedieval - a journal of medieval cultural studies, new in 2010