Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

anti-trafficking campaigns: decent? honest? truthful?

  • Open Space
  • Published:
Feminist Review

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. http://www.blueblindfold.co.uk/index.php.

  2. The debate between Richard Danziger and Rutvica Andrijasevic took place at the Kitson Club in Paris (14 September 2007).

References

  • Anderson, B. and O'Connell Davidson, J. (2002) Trafficking – a Demand Led Problem?: A Multi-Country Pilot Study, Save the Children.

  • Andrijasevic, R. (2007) ‘Beautiful dead bodies: gender, migration and representation in anti-trafficking campaigns’ Feminist Review, No. 86: 24–44.

  • Nieuwenhuys, C. and Pécoud, A. (2007) ‘Human trafficking, information campaigns, and strategies of migration control’ American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 50, No. 12: 1674–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell Davidson, J. (2006) ‘Will the real sex slave please stand up?’ Feminist Review, No. 83: 4–22.

  • Sharma, N. (2003) ‘Travel agency: a critique of anti-trafficking campaigns’ Refuge, Vol. 21, No. 3: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rutvica Andrijasevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bridget Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrijasevic, R., Anderson, B. anti-trafficking campaigns: decent? honest? truthful?. Fem Rev 92, 151–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2009.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2009.1

Search

Navigation