Abstract
Schlinger's Viewer Response Profile is a widely used tool in advertising research, in both commercial and academic environments. It is used in ad testing to gauge viewer reactions to television commercials. Initial research on its psychometric properties was critical of the scale; however, more recent work using more sophisticated statistical techniques and larger, more realistic, samples has been much more complimentary. This article reports on the use of a shorter version of the Schlinger scale to test financial services advertisements. The findings generally indicate that the scale can be used with confidence in that environment, and that the shorter scale generally performed well. The limitations of the study are acknowledged, managerial implications are discussed, and avenues for future research are identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Phillips, L.E. (2006) Financial services online marketing, http://www.emarketer.com/Report.aspx?code=finance_jul06, accessed 5 July 2010.
Howard, T. (2005) Financial services ads on the rise. USA Today 13 November, http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/adtrack/2005-11-13-chase_x.htm, accessed 5 July 2010.
Albers-Miller, N.D. and Straughan, R.D. (2000) Financial services advertising in eight non-English speaking countries. International Journal of Bank Marketing 18 (7): 347–358.
Leavitt, C. (1970) A multi-dimensional set of rating scales for television commercials. Journal of Applied Psychology 54 (5): 427–429.
Wells, W.D. (1964) EQ, son of EQ, and the reaction profile. Journal of Marketing 28 (4): 45–52.
Wells, W.D., Leavitt, C. and McConville, M. (1971) A reaction profile for TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 11 (6): 11–17.
Chen, Q. and Wells, W.D. (1999) Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (5): 27–37.
Lipstein, B.F. and Neelankavil, J.P. (1982) Television Advertising Copy Research Practices Among Major Advertisers and Advertising Agencies: An Advertising Research Foundation Survey. New York: Advertising Research Foundation.
Schlinger, M.J. (1979) A profile of responses to commercials. Journal of Advertising Research 19 (2): 37–46.
Zinkhan, G.M. and Burton, S. (1989) An examination of three multidimensional profiles for assessing consumer reactions to advertisements. Journal of Advertising 18 (4): 6–14.
Strasheim, A.C., Pitt, L.F. and Caruana, A. (2007) Psychometric properties of the Schlinger viewer response profile: Evidence from a large sample. Journal of Advertising 36 (4): 107–120.
Shimp, T.A. (1981) Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising 10 (2): 1–15.
Mackenzie, S.B, Lutz, R.J. and Belch, G. (1986) The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 23 (2): 130–143.
Mitchell, A.A. (1986) The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attributes and attitude toward advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (2): 12–24.
Zinkhan, G.M. and Fornell, C. (1985) A test of two consumer response scales in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 22 (4): 447–452.
Du Plessis, E. (1994) Understanding and using likeability. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (5): RC3–RC10.
Walker, D. and Dubitsky, T.M. (1994) Why liking matters. Journal of Advertising Research 34 (3): 9–17.
Callcott, M.F. and Phillips, B.J. (1996) Observations: Elves make good cookies: Creating likable spokes-character advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 36 (5): 73–80.
Murphy, W.H. and Tang, S.S.L. (1998) Continuous likeability measurement. Marketing Research 10 (2): 29–35.
Ewing, M.T., Napoli, J. and du Plessis, E. (1999) Factors affecting in-market recall of food product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 39 (4): 29–33.
Schlinger, M.J. (1982) Respondent characteristics that affect copy-test attitude scales. Journal of Advertising Research 22 (1): 29–35.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carman, J.M. (1990) Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing 66 (1): 33–55.
Hair Jr, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the data collection sponsored by Toluna Ltd, a global provider of online consumer panels.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
1holds PhD, MCom, BCom (Hons) degrees and is an adjunct Professor of Marketing in the Division of Industrial Marketing, e-Commerce and Logistics at Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. He is also co-founder and managing director of Aha! Research, an online marketing research firm in Hong Kong. He served as managing director of Nielsen/NetRatings Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and Korea, and as director of ACNielsen in Hong Kong and Canada. His publications have appeared in journals such as International Journal of Advertising, Business Horizons, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication and Journal of Financial Services Marketing.
2holds PhD, MBA, MCom degrees and is the Dennis F. Culver Chair of Business in the Beedie School of Business at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada. His work has appeared in publications such as the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Information Systems Research, Sloan Management Review and MIS Quarterly, which he also served as Associate Editor.
3holds PhD, MSc, BSc degrees and is a lecturer in marketing in the School of Management, Lancaster University. Her research interests include business-to-business relationships, channel management, emerging markets and advertising. She has published in journals such as the Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of Medical Marketing and the International Journal of Technology Marketing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steyn, P., Pitt, L. & Chakrabarti, R. Financial services ads and viewer response profiles: Psychometric properties of a shortened scale. J Financ Serv Mark 16, 210–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2011.23
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2011.23