Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative performance of conventional and Islamic unit trusts: Market timing and persistence evidence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is expected that the returns and resistance of Islamic mutual funds will be different from conventional mutual funds as the former have limited choices for portfolio diversification. This article analyses the performance of conventional and Islamic unit trusts for the period February 1995 to July 2012 in the Malaysian market, one of the most developed Islamic mutual fund markets. The performance analysis is based on four parameters: (i) risk-adjusted returns of unit trusts; (ii) market timing abilities; (iii) selection performance; and (iv) persistence. The results of this study suggest that the returns of both conventional and Islamic unit trusts have outperformed the market throughout the sample period. The results for market timing and selectivity are mostly the same for both categories of funds. However, Islamic unit trusts seem to have better resistance to market downturn than conventional unit trusts. The results of this research can be used by investors to identify funds or create portfolios that are more suitable for a recessionary scenario and for fund managers to better manage their portfolio performance during times when markets are likely to fall. The findings in this article are highly relevant for policymakers, investors and fund managers to determine policy matters, deciding on investment and marketing strategy for Islamic mutual funds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A. and Marcus, A.J. (2009) Investments. New York: McGraw Hill International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, N. and Busse, J. (2001) On timing ability of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Review 44 (4): 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J. and Goetzmann, W.N. (1995) Performance persistence. Journal of Finance 50 (2): 679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, D. and Helmer, M. (2001) The performance of professional market timers: Daily evidence from executed strategies. Journal of Financial Economics 62 (2): 377–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. and Lewellen, W. (1984) Impact of size and flows on performance for funds of hedge funds. Journal of Business 57 (1): 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.R., Cheng, F.L., Rahman, S. and Chan, A. (1992) A cross-sectional analysis of mutual funds’ market timing and security selection skill. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19 (5): 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L.T.W., Pi, L.K. and Wort, D. (1999) Are there hot hands among mutual fund houses in Hong Kong? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26 (1–2): 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggin, T.D., Fabozzi, F.J. and Rahman, S. (1993) The investment performance of US equity pension fund managers: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Finance 48 (3): 1039–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and Korajczyk, R.A. (1991) The attributes behavior and performance of U.S. Mutual funds. Re-view of Quantitative Finance Accounting 1: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumby, R.E. and Glen, J.D. (1990) Evaluating the performance of international mutual funds. Journal of Finance 45: 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfakhani, S., Hassan, M.K. and Sidani, Y. (2005) Comparative performance of Islamic versus secular mutual funds, http://www.middle-east-studies.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/sidani-IslamicMutualFunds.pdf, accessed 6 November 2012.

  • Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J. and Blake, C.A. (1996) The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business 69 (2): 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauziah, M.T., Suhaimi, S. and Lee, H.L. (2002) Malaysian Unit Trust Fund Performance. Proceedings for the Fourth Annual Malaysian Finance Association Symposium, Penang.

  • Ferson, W. and Schadt, R. (1996) Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. Journal of Finance 51 (2): 425–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikriyah, A., Taufiq, H. and Shamsher, M. (2007) Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds. Journal of Managerial Finance 33 (2): 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firer, C., Beale, J.P., Edwards, M.D., Hendrie, J.N. and Scheppening, D.C. (2001) The persistence of performance of South African unit trusts. The South African Journal of Business Management 32 (2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M.A. (1977) The investment performance of unit trusts in the period 1965–76. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 9 (1): 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. and Ibbotson, R. (1994) Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance. Journal of Portfolio Management 20 (2): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W., Ingersoll, J. and Ivković, Z. (2000) Monthly measurement of daily timers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35 (3): 257–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. (1978) Market timing and portfolio management. The Journal of Finance 33 (4): 1119–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1989) Portfolio performance evaluation: Old issues and new insights. Review of Financial Studies 5 (2): 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1992) The persistence of mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 47: 1977–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, D., Patel, J. and Zeckhauser, R. (1993) Hot hands in mutual funds: Short run persistence of relative performance, 1974-88. Journal of Finance 48: 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, R.D. (1984) Market timing and mutual fund performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business 57 (1): 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., Coggin, T.D. and Rahman, S. (1992) The correlation between sampling errors in estimating security selection and market timing ability. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Working paper.

  • Investment Company Institute (ICI) (2009) How mutual funds and investment companies operate, Investment Company Fact Book, http://www.icifactbook.org/fb_appa.html, accessed 6 November 2012.

  • Jagannathan, R. and Korajczyk, R. (1986) Assessing the market timing performance of managed portfolios. Journal of Business 59 (2): 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. (1968) The performance of the mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance 23 (2): 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. (1969) Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment performance. Journal of Business 42 (2): 167–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S.J. and Jen, F.C. (1979) The investment performance of mutual funds: An empirical investigation of timing, selectivity and market efficiency. Journal of Business 52 (2): 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S.J. (1983) The market timing performance of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business 56 (3): 321–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M.M. and Lau, S.H. (2009) The performance persistence and stimulated returns of Malaysia mutual funds, http://www.eurojournals.com/irjfe_44_15.pdf, accessed 6 November 2012.

  • Lau, W.Y. (2007) An integrated framework for style analysis: How is it useful to Malaysian equity trust investors? Managerial Finance 33 (2): 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, B.N. and Modest, D.M. (1987) Mutual fund performance evaluation: A comparison of benchmarks and benchmark comparisons. Journal of Finance 42 (2): 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, S.W. and Ghazali, N.A. (2007) The price linkages between Malaysian unit trust funds and the stock market. Managerial Finance 33 (2): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B.G. (1995) Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971–1991. Journal of Finance 50 (2): 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassir, A.M., Mohamed, S. and Ngu, M.H. (1997) Selectivity and timing: Evidence from the performance of Malaysian unit trusts. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities 5 (1): 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. and Kroeger, J.A. (2005) Performance, persistence and benchmarks of selected South African unit trusts for the period 1998–2002. South African Journal of Business Management 36 (4): 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, G.E. and Trifts, J.W. (1998) The performance persistence of experienced mutual fund managers. Financial Services Review 7 (1): 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities Commission of Malaysia (2012) Data and statistics/Unit trust fund in Malaysia, http://www.sc.com.my/main.asp?pageid=302&menuid=252&newsid=&linkid=&type=, accessed 6 November 2012.

  • Sehgal, S. and Jhanwar, M. (2008) On stock selection skills and market timing abilities of mutual fund managers in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 15 (1): 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsher, M., Annuar, M.N. and Taufiq, H. (2000) Investment in unit trusts: Performance of active and passive funds. Proceedings of FEP Seminar, Issues in Accounting and Finance 2: 129-41. UPM Press, Malaysia.

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1966) Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business 39 (1): 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J.L. and Mazuy, K. (1966) Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review 44 (4): 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nottingham University Business School, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Selangor, 43500, Jalan Broga, Semenyih, Malaysia

    Nafis Alam, Kin Boon Tang & Mohammad Shadique Rajjaque

Authors
  1. Nafis Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kin Boon Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Shadique Rajjaque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nafis Alam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alam, N., Tang, K. & Rajjaque, M. A comparative performance of conventional and Islamic unit trusts: Market timing and persistence evidence. J Financ Serv Mark 18, 316–326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2013.24

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2013.24

Keywords

Search

Navigation