For Authors_For Subscribers_For Librarians_For SocietiesFor Advertisers

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site Map | FAQs

journal home
 
Services for Readers
Services for authors
Customer Services


June 2004, Volume 17, Number 2, Pages 153-166
Table of contents   Previous  Full text  Next   PDF
Strategic Research, Post-modern Universities and Research Training
Arie Ripa

aUniversity of Twente, Science, Technology and Society (Faculty of BTT), PO Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands. E-mail: a.rip@utwente.nl

Abstract

The old division of labour between fundamental and applied or problem-oriented research has almost disappeared, and with it, the functional distinctions between universities, public labs and industrial and other private research. Doctoral research training can then also become diversified in terms of its content and its location. Closer analysis of ongoing changes, in particular, the emergence of a regime of strategic science, is necessary to specify requirements for a career in science in the coming decades. Disciplines as we know them may not be of major importance, but interdisciplinarity as such is not the answer. For universities, the key challenge is to diversify and recombine, both cognitively and institutionally, into what I call a post-modern university, which includes overlaps and alliances with centres (of excellence and relevance), public labs and various private organizations. In such a university, a doctoral student can wend his or her way through the types of locations, just as is to be expected of his or her later career.

Higher Education Policy (2004) 17, 153-166. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300048

Keywords

doctoral programmes; science careers; science technology and society

Table of contents   Previous  Full text  Next   PDF