Higher Education Policy

FIGURES AND TABLES

FROM:

On Improving the University Research Base: The Technical University of Lisbon Case in Perspective

Hugo Horta

BACK TO ARTICLE
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 1.

Inbreeding rate for the Oporto University, Technical University of Lisbon, University of Wisconsin (Madison) and University of Texas (Austin), 1990–2002.
Note: Data to the Technical University of Lisbon and to the Oporto University refer to each university engineering school. Source: UTL, 2005.

Full figure and legend (119K)
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Figure 2.

Relation between UTL faculties academic staff qualifications and the exercise of research activities (quantified by Ph.D. candidates holding an FCT fellowship).
Source: adapted from UTL, 2005.
Note 1: The indicator used to quantify the exercise of research activities was university Ph.D. candidates benefiting from Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) fellowships. This measure was used because most Ph.D. candidates benefit from this fellowship, which is granted under a highly competitive process (and thus can be also perceived as a quality indicator), and because the statistics supplied by FCT are official and reliable.
Note 2: IST Faculty of Engineering; ISEG: Faculty of Economics and Management; ISCSP: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences; FA: Faculty of Architecture; FMH: Faculty of Human Mobility; FMV: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; ISA: Faculty of Agronomy.

Full figure and legend (55K)
BACK TO ARTICLE