Skip to main content
Log in

Leading and Managing Contemporary UK Universities: Do Excellence and Meritocracy still Prevail over Diversity?

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper uses a gendered and feminist perspective to explore some dimensions of the debate about excellence and diversity in relation to the leadership and management of UK universities. The paper considers the extent to which notions about excellence and diversity are in tension in UK higher education and how understandings, underpinning values and the practical consequences of excellence and diversity connect or are at odds with the equally pervasive idea of a university as a meritocracy. The paper draws on two recent research projects, one which examined the experiences and management of equal opportunities policies for university staff in six UK universities and the other which has analysed public service leadership, leadership development and change agency in schools, health services and universities in England.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thanks to Jenneth Parker, who has worked on the data collection and analysis of the higher education strand of the Change Agent Project; Louise Morley and Anwar Tlili, who worked with me on the ‘Negotiating Equity’ project; and Miriam David, Louise Morley and Kevin Brehony, who made helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

  2. Paper presented at the 2008 Conference of the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Pavia, Italy, 11–13 September.

  3. The names of institutions are pseudonyms.

  4. In England, Scotland and Wales, positive discrimination, such as, for instance, deliberately targeting women or members of ethnic minority groups as candidates or appointing them because they are under-represented is illegal. It is only legal in Northern Ireland that has different legislation arising from the longstanding sectarian conflicts there.

References

  • Abbott, P. and Sapsford, R. (2005) ‘Statistics for equal opportunities in higher education’, Higher Education Funding Council for England, retrieved May 2005 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd08_05.

  • Bargh, C., Bocock, J., Scott, P. and Smith, D. (2000) University Leadership: The Role of The Chief Executive, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, P. and Graham, S. (2005) ‘Leadership excellence: constructing the role of department’, Academic Leadership — The On-line Journal 3 (1), retrieved August 2008 from http://www.academicleadership.org/emprical_research/LEADERSHIP_EXCELLENCE_CONSTRUCTING_THE_ROLE_OF_DEPARTMENT.shtml.

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2008) Developing Collective Leadership in Higher Education, London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G. (2006) ‘Leadership in education: the case of vice-chancellors’, Perspectives 10 (2): 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G. and Tytherleigh, M.Y. (2008) The Characteristics, Roles and Selection of Vice-Chancellors — Summary Report, London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2007) Effective Leadership in Higher Education, London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M. (2009) ‘Social diversity and democracy in higher education in 21st century: towards a feminist critique’, Higher Education Policy 22 (1): 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2007) ‘Managing a meritocracy or an equitable organisation? Senior managers’ and employees’ views about equal opportunities policies in UK universities’, Journal of Education Policy 22 (6): 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S. and Reed, M. (2007) Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. and Morley, L. (2006) ‘Diversity in the academy? Staff and senior manager perceptions of equality policies in six contemporary UK higher education institutions’, Policy Futures 4 (2): 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Morley, L. and Tlili, A. (2005) ‘Negotiating equity in HEIs: a case-study analysis of policies and staff experiences’, Higher Education Funding Council for England, retrieved May 2005 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd10_05/.

  • Exworthy, M. and Halford, S. (eds.) (1999) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995) ‘From redistribution to recognition: dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age’, New Left Review I/212 (July–August): 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000) ‘Rethinking recognition’, New Left Review 3 (May–June): 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (1998) Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, A. (2009) Qualified to Lead? Why Research Universities should be Led by Top Scholars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbank, P. (2006) ‘The evolution of government policy on widening participation’, Higher Education Quarterly 60 (2): 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. (2006) ‘Widening participation, equalising opportunity? Higher education's mission impossible’, Politics 26 (2): 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (2003) ‘Research selectivity and female academics in UK universities: from gentleman's club and barrack yard to smart macho’, Gender & Education 15 (4): 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennie, T. and Woodfield, S. (2007) ‘Top team structures in UK higher education institutions: composition, challenges and changes’, unpublished paper presented to the European Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Rome, Italy.

  • Kerckhoff, A.C., Fogelman, K., Crook, D. and Reeder, D. (1996) Going Comprehensive in England and Wales, London: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layer, G. (2005) Closing the Equity Gap: The Impact of Widening Participation Strategies in the UK and USA, Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, L. (2006) The Research Game in Academic Life, Maidenhead: Open University Press & the Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, F.A. and Tetreault, M.K.T. (2007) Privilege and Diversity in the Academy, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (2007) ‘Sister-matic: gender mainstreaming in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education 12 (5): 607–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. and Lugg, R. (2009) ‘Mapping meritocracy: intersecting gender, poverty and higher educational opportunity structures’, Higher Education Policy 22 (1): 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and Waterman, R.H. (1982) In Search of Excellence, London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP. (2005) ‘Cross-sectoral study of equal opportunities and diversity’, Higher Education Funding Council for England, retrieved May 2005 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd11_05/.

  • Ross, K. (2005) ‘National survey of equal opportunities practices in higher education’, Higher Education Funding Council for England, retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd13_05/.

  • Salisbury, J. and Riddell, S. (eds.) (2000) Gender, Policy and Educational Change: Shifting Agendas in the UK and Europe, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. (2002) ‘Culture, Equality and Diversity’, in P. Kelly (ed.) Multiculturalism Reconsidered, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strebler, M. and O’Regan, S. (2005) ‘Non-disclosure and hidden discrimination in higher education’, Higher Education Funding Council for England, retrieved May 2005 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2005/rd09_05.

  • Tlili, A. (2007) ‘Rendering equality and diversity policies in UK higher education institutions’, Critical Discourse Studies 4 (3): 283–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2008) ‘Hunting the headhunters’, Engage 1 (14): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deem, R. Leading and Managing Contemporary UK Universities: Do Excellence and Meritocracy still Prevail over Diversity?. High Educ Policy 22, 3–17 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.32

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.32

Keywords

Navigation