Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Universities in Strengthening Local Capabilities for Innovation — A Comparative Case Study

Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports on a comparative case study of the role played by local universities and public research organizations in the development of local capabilities for innovation in two key gateways to the North Sea oil and gas province: the Stavanger region on the southwest coast of Norway and the Aberdeen region in northeast Scotland. These two regions provide an ideal setting for a matched pair comparison, as the circumstances under which they developed into ‘oil capitals’ are strikingly similar. Despite circumstantial similarities, the local education and research organizations in the two regions embraced their ‘third role’ of engagement in regional development quite differently. While the education and research institutions in Stavanger developed relevant technological capabilities based on implicit and explicit coordination and collaboration with the local oil and gas industry, the Aberdeen institutions developed ties to industry not as a result of institutional efforts to respond to industrial needs, but rather through the actions of individual academics in a diverse range of disciplines. Two very different innovation systems emerged but so far, there is no evidence stating that one is more successful than the other in building strong and competitive regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Type I: Indigenous creation of a new industry; Type II: Transplantation/importation of new industry; Type III: Diversification of old industry in to related new; Type IV: Upgrading of mature industry (see Lester, 2005).

  2. The number of papers published in the (SPE) database is a quantitative measure of application-oriented research relevant to industry (see Table 1). SPE papers generally do not report on fundamental scientific research. Their coverage tends to centre on exploration and production-related petroleum engineering and technology and does not extend to related fields such as geosciences or petroleum economics. The SPE database constitutes one of the most important bodies of codified knowledge for the industry. PA is a database administered by the University of Tulsa, and provides a more comprehensive measure of research contributions covering a broader range of fields relevant to exploration and production, including geosciences, social sciences, and economics.

  3. SINTEF has about 290 employees in their Petroleum and Energy Division, compared with about 90 in RF Petroleum.

References

  • Aldrich, H. (1999) Organizations Evolving, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. (2002) Nordic SME-Forum-Regional Systems of Innovation, Oslo: Nordisk Industrifond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2000) ‘The response of higher education institutions to regional needs’, European Journal of Education 35 (4): 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, E., Bower, J. and Keogh, W. (1997) ‘Conflict or collaboration: The changing nature of inter-firm relationships in the UK oil and gas industry’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 9 (2): 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E. and Pickering, H. (2008) ‘The contribution of higher education to regional cultural development in the North East Of England’, Higher Education Management and Policy 20 (2): 125–137. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D. (2002) ‘What should we know about regional systems of innovation?’ Technology in Society 24: 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2002) ‘Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks’, Science and Public Policy 29 (2): 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1996) ‘Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations’, Science and Public Policy 23: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2005) ‘Innovation: A Guide to the Literature’, in J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontline Management Consultants & Ron Botham Associates. (2000) ‘Marine Engineering, Technologies and Service Cluster Analysis, Report for Scottish Enterprise.

  • Goddard, J. and Puukka, J. (2008) ‘The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges’, Higher Education Management and Policy 20 (2): 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekara, C. (2006) ‘Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (1): 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatakenaka, S. (2004) University-Industry Partnerships in MIT, Cambridge and Tokyo: Storytelling across Boundaries, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatakenaka, S. (2008) ‘The role of higher education institutions in high tech industry: what does international experience tell us?’ Proceedings from the World Bank ABCDE Conference; 9–11 June 2008; Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTABCDESOUAFR2008/ Resources/SachiHatakenaka.pdf, forthcoming in the conference proceedings.

  • Hatakenaka, S., Westnes, P., Gjelsvik, M. and Lester, R.K. (2006) ‘From “Black Gold” to “Human Gold” — A comparative study of the oil and gas industry in Stavanger and Aberdeen’, MIT IPC Working Paper 06–004.

  • Holland, B.A. (2001) ‘Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged university’, Metropolitan Universities 2 (3): 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, B.W. (1999) Fra universitetsvisjon til høyskoleintegrasjon, Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget (Norwegian Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, J. (2005) ‘When regional development becomes an institutional responsibility for universities: The need for a discussion about knowledge construction in relation to universities’ third role’, AI & Society 19: 500–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F. and Suzuki, J. (2007) ‘How Japanese companies have used scientific advances to restructure their businesses: The receiver-active national system of innovation’, World Development 35 (6): 976–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2008) ‘Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities?’ Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R.K. (2005) ‘Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies’, MIT IPC Working Paper 005–010.

  • Lundvall, B.-Å (2002) ‘The university in the learning economy’, DRUID (Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics), Working paper no 02–06.

  • MacKinnon, D., Chapman, K. and Cumbers, A. (2004) ‘Networking, trust and embeddedness amongst SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 16 (March): 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. (1991) Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Change, Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1999) ‘Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies’, Regional Studies 33: 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C. and Sampat, B.N. (2005) ‘Universities in National Innovation Systems’, in J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science, Knowledge and The Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007) Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged, Paris: OECD.

  • Puukka, J. and Marmolejo, F. (2008) ‘Higher education institutions and regional mission: Lessons learned from OECD review project’, Higher Education Policy 21 (2): 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. and Somers, M. (1980) ‘The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, S. and Viljamaa, K. (2002) ‘Economic institutionalization in practice: Development and the “third role” of universities’, MIT IPC Working Paper 05–002.

  • Tura, T. and Harmaakorpi, V. (2005) ‘Social capital in buil ding regional innovative capability’, Regional Studies 39 (8): 1111–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S. (2008) ‘Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and business’, Research Policy 37 (8): 1167–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westnes, P., Hatakenaka, S., Gjelsvik, M. et al. The Role of Universities in Strengthening Local Capabilities for Innovation — A Comparative Case Study. High Educ Policy 22, 483–503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.14

Keywords

Navigation