Skip to main content
Log in

A Methodology for Sustainability Evaluation and Reporting in Higher Education Institutions

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a methodology that allows higher education institutions (HEIs) to promote, to evaluate and to report on sustainability. The ultimate goal of the afore-mentioned methodology is to help HEIs achieve sustainability. First, a model entitled Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions (SusHEI) that generally describes and characterizes the functioning of an HEI was defined. SusHEI takes into account the core activities of any HEI (education and research), its impacts at economic, environmental and social levels, and the role of its community. SusHEI allowed for the establishment of internal dimensions interrelated to the functioning of an HEI. Then, a matricial representation of the model was developed. The matrix crosses internal dimensions (and eventually sub-dimensions) with sustainability dimensions (and eventually sub-dimensions) and it is quantified through indicators. There is a wide range of possible sustainability indicators that can be chosen, depending on the purpose and the public to whom the indicators/reports are addressed. The methodology is illustrated by a case-study — the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto (FEUP). This paper provides a methodology that enables the selection of sustainability indicators for sustainability reporting, assessment or even for benchmarking, and also eliminates some of the main weaknesses found in the models currently available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshuwaikhat, H.M. and Abubakar, I. (2008) ‘An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices’, Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (16): 1777–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H.W., Darrall, J. and Grove-White, R. (1997) ‘Maximising the local economic, environmental and social benefits of a university: Lancaster University’, GeoJournal 41 (4): 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2008) http://www.ulsf.org/, accessed 31 May 2010.

  • Beringer, A. (2007) ‘The Lüneburg sustainable university project in international comparison: An assessment against North American peers’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 8 (4): 446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, A. and Adomßent, M. (2008) ‘Sustainable University research and development: Inspecting sustainability in higher education research’, Environmental Education Research 14 (6): 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownrigg, M. (1973) ‘The economic impact of a New University’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 20 (2): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clugston, R. and Calder, R. (2000) ‘Critical Dimensions of Sustainability in Higher Education’, in L.F. Walter (ed.) Sustainability and University Life, Germany: Peter Lang, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L. (2003) ‘Assessing sustainability on Canadian Universities campuses: Development of a campus sustainability assessment framework’, Master's Thesis in Arts in Environment and Management, Royal Roads University.

  • Cortese, D. (2003) ‘The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future’, Planning for Higher Education 31 (3): 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2010) ‘Share of women among tertiary students’, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/, accessed May 2010.

  • Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto. (2004) ‘Relatório de Actividades e contas 2004’, Available from http://www.fe.up.pt/, accessed May 2010.

  • Fernandes, R. (2007) ‘Local and regional impacts of the University of Porto’, Master's Thesis in Economy, Faculty of Economy, University of Porto.

  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2006) ‘Sustainability reporting guidelines’, Available from http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/A1FB5501-B0DE-4B69-A900-27DD8A4C2839/0/G3_GuidelinesENG.pdf, accessed May 2010.

  • Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2008) ‘Statistical yearbook of the Northern region 2007’, Available from http://www.ine.pt, accessed April 2011.

  • Lozano, R. (2003) ‘Sustainable development in higher education, incorporation, assessment and reporting of sustainable development in higher education institutions’, Master's thesis in Environmental Management and Policy, International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund, Sweden.

  • Lozano, R. (2006) ‘A tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU)’, Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (9–11): 963–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukman, R. and Glavič, P. (2007) ‘What are the key elements of a sustainable university?’ Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 9 (2): 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madeira, A.C. (2008) ‘Sustainability indicators for higher education institutions’, Master's Thesis in Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto.

  • Michigan State University, Office of Campus Sustainability, University Committee for a Sustainable Campus. (2007) ‘Campus Sustainability Report’, Available from http://www.campuserc.org/resources/reports/Pages/MichiganStateUniversityCampusSustainabilityReport.aspx, accessed May 2010.

  • Mintzberg, H. and Quinn, J.B. (1996) The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, N. and Martens, P. (2008) ‘Assessment and certification of higher education for sustainable development’, Sustainability: The Journal of Record 1 (1): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, M. (2002a) ‘Sustainability in U.S. higher education: Organizational factors influencing campus environmental performance and leadership’, Ph.D. Dissertation (Natural Resources and Environment), University of Michigan.

  • Shriberg, M. (2002b) ‘Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 3 (3): 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D. and Wortman, D. (2008) ‘Education for sustainability in further and higher education: reflections along the journey’, Planning for Higher Education 36 (4): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorton, D.M. (1986) ‘Implementation of a matrix organizational structure: A case study’, Paper presented at the Visions of Higher Education Conference 19 August, Zurich, Switzerland.

  • Wright, T. (2002) ‘Policy, change and environmental sustainability in the university’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madeira, A., Carravilla, M., Oliveira, J. et al. A Methodology for Sustainability Evaluation and Reporting in Higher Education Institutions. High Educ Policy 24, 459–479 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.18

Keywords

Navigation