Skip to main content
Log in

Governance and Institutional Autonomy: Governing and Governance in Portuguese Higher Education

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at looking at governance instruments beyond managerial technicality. It intends to do so by analysing the impact of governance reforms on the universities autonomy assumed as a regulation instrument to politically steer systems and institutions. The regulation efforts undertaken at the European and national levels reflect a trend towards coordination of devolved governance processes (meta-governance). Although there is a wide consensus about awarding autonomy to universities and increasing self-governance, governments need to ensure that their goals are actually pursued, enhancing their regulation frames and meta-governance efforts. This paper focuses on how the governance reform interacts with institutional contexts. The changes promoted by the governance reform are an opportunity to understand how far these apparently contradictory forces operate in three selected Portuguese universities with regard to institutional autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaral, A. and Magalhães, A. (2001) ‘On markets, autonomy and regulation the janus head revisited’, Higher Education Policy 14 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Tavares, O. and Santos, C. (2011) ‘Higher Education Reform in Portugal: An Historical and Comparative Perspective of the New Legal Framework for Public Universities’, Paper presented at the Third International RESUP Conference; 28 January, Paris, France.

  • Bache, I. (2008) Europeanization and Multilevel Governance — Cohesion Policy in the EU and Britain, London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (1999) Understanding Regulation, Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. and Sahlin-Andersen, K. (2000) ‘Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform’, Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHEPS. (2007) ‘The extent and impact of higher education governance reform across Europe — Final report to the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (Vol. 1)’, Enschede.

  • Chubb, J. and Moe, T. (1990) Politics, Markets and America's Schools, Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (2007a) ‘Globalization and the Rescaling of Educational Governance: A Case of Sociological Ectopia’, in C.A. Torres and A. Teodoro (eds.) Critique and Utopia: New Developments in the Sociology of Education in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (2007b) ‘Repairing the Deficits of Modernity — The Emergence of Parallel Discourses in Higher Education in Europe’, in D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi and S. Wright (eds.) World Yearbook of Education 2008, London: Routledge, pp. 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001) European Governance — A White Paper, Brussels: European Commission.

  • Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44: 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, O. (2010) ‘Does Governance Exist?’, in S. Osborne (ed.) The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, P. (2010) ‘Global Perspectives on Governance’, in S. Osborne (ed.) The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. (2010) Governance, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, P. (2010) Between Governing and Governance: On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe's Post-national Constellation, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. (2003) ‘Institutional choice and policy transfer: Reforming British and German railway regulation’, Governance 16 (2): 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A. and Amaral, A. (2000) ‘Portuguese higher education and the imaginary friend: The stakeholders role in institutional governance’, European Journal of Education 35 (4): 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Ribeiro, F.M., Sousa, S. and Santiago, R. (2012) ‘Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance’, Higher Education, DOI: 10.1007/s10734-012-9583-7, pp. 1–18.

  • Magalhães, A.M. (2004) A Identidade do Ensino Superior — política, conhecimento e educação numa época de transição, Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian/Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V.L. (2003) ‘Introduction’, in A. Amaral, V.L. Meek and I.M. Larsen (eds.) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution?, Dordrecht: Kluwers Academic Publishers, pp. 1–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, V. (2008) ‘O Estatuto Legal das Instituições de Ensino Superior’, in A. Amaral (ed.) Políticas de Ensino Superior – quatro temas em debate, Lisbon: Conselho Nacional de Educação, pp. 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2008) ‘From Guardian to Overseer: Trends in Institutional Autonomy, Governance and Leadership’, in A. Amaral (ed.) Reforma do Ensino Superior: Quatro Temas em Debate, Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2012) The Prince and His Pleasure Institutional Autonomy, the Evaluative State and Re-engineering Higher Education in Western Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995) Participatory Development and Good Governance, Paris: OECD.

  • Osborne, S. (2010) The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (2001) The Future of Governing, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (2010) ‘Meta-Governance and Public Management’, in S. Osborne (ed.) The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, P. and Peters, G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State, New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollit, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) ‘The new governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies 44: 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. (2010) Globalizing Education Policy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E. (2000) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (2002) ‘The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction’, in L. Salamon (ed.) The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Magalhães, A. and Carvalho, T. (2005) O surgimento do Managerialismo no sistema de Ensino Superior Português, Masotinhos: CIPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1995) The Meanings of Mass Higher Education, London: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • UniA. (2009) ‘Self-Evaluation Report’.

  • UniA. (2010) ‘Evaluation Report’, European University Association, Institutional Evaluation Programme.

  • UniB. (2007a) ‘Evaluation Report’, European University Association, Institutional Evaluation Programme.

  • UniB. (2007b) ‘Self-Evaluation Report’.

  • UniC. (2009) ‘Evaluation Report’, European University Association, Institutional Evaluation Programme.

  • World Bank. (1992) Governance and Development, Washington DC: World Bank.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Funds through the support of FCT — Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under the framework of the EuroHESC/0001/2008 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Ribeiro, F. et al. Governance and Institutional Autonomy: Governing and Governance in Portuguese Higher Education. High Educ Policy 26, 243–262 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.31

Keywords

Navigation