Abstract
The metaphor of the student as a consumer or customer is widely used within contemporary higher education, and impacts on the ways in which students, academics and institutions behave. These, and a number of alternative metaphors for the student, are critically reviewed. The alternatives considered include both contemporary (student as client or as co-producer) and longstanding expressions (student as child, employer or apprentice). A new, and perhaps rather darker, metaphor, that of the student as a pawn, is then proposed. The usefulness of metaphors in higher education policy, and in analyses thereof, is considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, J. (2000) ‘Students as clients in a professional/client relationship’, Journal of Management Education 24 (3): 353–365.
Bartlett, A. and Mercer, G. (1999) ‘Cooking up a Feast: Finding metaphors for feminist postgraduate supervisions’, Australian Feminist Studies 14 (30): 367–375.
Bell, R. and Tight, M. (1993) Open Universities: A British Tradition? Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bessant, J. (2002) ‘Dawkins’ higher education reforms and how metaphors work in policy making’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 24 (1): 87–99.
Browne Report. (2010) ‘Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding and student finance’, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31999/10-1208-securing-sustainable-higher-education-browne-report.pdf.
Cameron, L. (2003) Metaphor in Educational Discourse, London: Continuum.
Cameron, L. and Low, G. (eds.) (1999) Researching and Applying Metaphor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cortazzi, M. and Jin, L. (1999) ‘Bridges to Learning: Metaphors of Teaching, Learning and Language’, in L. Cameron and G. Low (eds.) Researching and Applying Metaphor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–176.
Cuthbert, R. (2010) ‘Students as customers?’, Higher Education Review 42 (3): 3–25.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2009) Higher Ambitions: The Future of Universities in a Knowledge Economy, London: DBIS.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011) Higher Education: Students at the Heart of the System, London: DBIS, Cm 8122.
European Ministers of Education. (1999) Joint Declaration, Bologna: European Ministers of Education.
Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, translated by M. Ramer, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Freire, P. (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness, London: Sheed and Ward.
Furlong, P. (2005) ‘British higher education and the Bologna Process: An interim assessment’, Politics 25 (1): 53–61.
Gibbs, R. (ed.) (2008) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, B. (2008) ‘Agonistic struggle: master-slave dialogues in humanities supervision’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 7 (1): 9–27.
Hager, P. (2008) ‘Learning and metaphors’, Medical Teacher 30 (7): 679–686.
Halbesleben, J., Becker, J. and Buckley, M. (2003) ‘Considering the labor contributions of students: An alternative to the student-as-customer metaphor’, Journal of Education for Business 78 (5): 255–257.
Halbesleben, J. and Wheeler, A. (2009) ‘Student identification with business education models’, Journal of Management Education 33 (2): 166–195.
Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (forthcoming) ‘The Metaphors we Study by: the doctorate as a journey and/or as work’, Higher Education Research and Development.
Kaye, T., Bickel, R. and Birtwistle, T. (2006) ‘Criticising the image of the student as consumer: Explaining legal trends and administrative responses in the US and UK’, Education and the Law 18 (2–3): 85–129.
Keeling, R. (2006) ‘The Bologna Process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European commission's expanding role in higher education discourse’, European Journal of Education 41 (2): 203–223.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980/2003) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, A. and Green, B. (2009) ‘Supervision as metaphor’, Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–630.
Loads, D. (2010) ‘ “I’m a dancer” and “I’ve got a saucepan stuck on my head”: Metaphor in helping lecturers to develop being-for-uncertainty’, Teaching in Higher Education 15 (4): 409–421.
Lomas, L. (2007) ‘Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff’, Quality in Higher Education 13 (1): 31–44.
Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A. and Cameron, L. (eds.) (2010) Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marschall, M. (2004) ‘Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of public goods’, Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 231–244.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (eds.) (2005) The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education third (internet) edition, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
McCulloch, A. (2009) ‘The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship’, Studies in Higher Education 34 (2): 171–183.
McMillan, J. and Cheney, G. (1996) ‘The student as consumer: The implications and limitations of a metaphor’, Communication Education 45 (1): 1–15.
McPherson, A. (1973) ‘Selections and Survivals: A Sociology of the Ancient Scottish Universities’, in R. Brown (ed.) Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change, London: Tavistock.
Michelsen, S. (2010) ‘Humboldt meets Bologna’, Higher Education Policy 23 (2): 151–172.
Neave, G. (2002) ‘Anything goes: Or, how the accommodation of Europe's universities to European integration integrates an inspiring number of contradictions’, Tertiary Education and Management 8 (3): 181–197.
Neave, G. and Amaral, A. (2008) ‘On process, progress, success and methodology or the unfolding of the Bologna Process as it appears to two reasonably benign observers’, Higher Education Quarterly 62 (1–2): 40–62.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011) Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society: Pointers for Policy Development, Paris: OECD, Directorate for Education, Education and Training Policy Division.
Ravinet, P. (2008) ‘From voluntary participation to monitored coordination: Why European countries feel increasingly bound by their commitment to the Bologna Process’, European Journal of Education 43 (3): 353–367.
Reid, A., Dahlgren, L., Petocz, P. and Dahlgren, M. (2008) ‘Identity and engagement for professional formation’, Studies in Higher Education 33 (6): 729–742.
Saarinen, T. (2005) ‘ “Quality” in the Bologna Process: From “competitive edge” to quality assurance techniques’, European Journal of Education 40 (2): 189–204.
Saarinen, T. (2008) ‘Position of text and discourse analysis in higher education policy research’, Studies in Higher Education 33 (6): 719–728.
Sfard, A. (1998) ‘On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one’, Educational Researcher 27 (2): 4–13.
Sharrock, G. (2000) ‘Why Students are not (just) Customers (and other reflections on life after George)’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22 (2): 149–164.
Silver, H. and Silver, P. (1997) Students: Changing Roles, Changing Lives, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tight, M. (2011) ‘Student accommodation in higher education in the United Kingdom: Changing post-war attitudes’, Oxford Review of Education 37 (1): 109–122.
Tight, M. (2012) ‘Who decides higher education policy? MPs, VCs, STEM and HASS’, Higher Education Review 44 (3): 41–53.
Verger, J. (1992) ‘Patterns’, in H. de Ridder-Symoens (ed.) A History of the University in Europe. Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–74.
Westerheijden, D. et al. (no date) ‘The Bologna Process independent assessment. The first decade of working on the European higher education area. Volume 1: detailed assessment report’, CHEPS/INCHER-Kassel/ECOTEC, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc1290_en.htm.