Abstract
This study used a multi-theoretical approach to examine the associations between institutional policies on the assessment of faculty pedagogy and faculty’s use of learner-centred assessment (LCA) practices in their undergraduate classrooms in the United States. We found strong evidence that it was not the number of methods but the types of methods used by institutions to evaluate teaching that were significantly associated with the extent to which faculty use LCA practices in their undergraduate courses. Our results returned conflicting patterns: Assessments that were conducted top-down — those by deans and department heads — were associated with a reduced rate of LCA use in classrooms, whereas assessments that relied on data from students, peers, or faculty themselves were associated with a greater rate of LCA use. Yet, most student-centric methods to evaluate teaching, including the popular use of student evaluations of teaching, were unrelated to the incorporation of effective pedagogy. The pattern of results did not vary significantly across different types of higher education institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, M.S. (2011) ‘Managing change — Engaging faculty in assessment opportunities’, Innovative Higher Education 36 (4): 217–233.
Andrews, T.M., Leonard, M.J., Colgrove, C.A. and Kalinowski, S.T. (2011) ‘Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses’, CBE Life Sciences Education 10 (4): 394–405.
Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E. and Weiss, M. (2009) ‘Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory Biology’, CBE-Life Sciences Education 8 (3): 203–213.
Arum, R. and Roksa, J. (2010) Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Atkinson, D.J. and Bolt, S. (2010) ‘Using teaching observations to reflect upon and improve teaching practice in higher education’, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (3): 1–19.
Banta, T.W., Jones, E.A. and Black, K.E. (2009) Designing Effective Assessment: Principles and Profiles of Good Practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Becker, W.E., Bosshardt, W. and Watts, M. (2012) ‘How departments of economics evaluate teaching’, Journal of Economic Education 43 (3): 325–333.
Bogue, E.G. and Johnson, B.D. (2010) ‘Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: A quarter century policy audit’, Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (2): 1–22.
Braxton, J.M. (2008) ‘Toward a Theory of Faculty Professional Choices in Teaching that Foster College Student Success’, in J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, New York: Springer, pp. 181–207.
Carey, K. and Schneider, M. (2010) Accountability in Higher Education, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clogg, C.C., Petkova, E. and Haritou, A. (1995) ‘Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models’, American Journal of Sociology 100 (5): 1261–1293.
Cox, B.E., McIntosh, K.L., Reason, R.D. and Terenzini, P.T. (2011) ‘A culture of teaching: Policy, perception, and practice in higher education’, Research in Higher Education 52 (8): 808–829.
D’Andrea, V. and Gosling, D. (2005) Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, New York: Open University Press.
David, M. (2010) Effective Learning and Teaching in UK Higher Education, London: TLRP.
Duncan, T. and Buskirk-Cohen, A.A. (2011) ‘Exploring learner-centered assessment: A cross-disciplinary approach’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 23 (2): 246–259.
Ewell, P.T. (2009) Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Revisiting the Tension, Champaign: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Ewell, P.T., Paulson, K. and Kinzie, J. (2011) Down and Out: Assessment Practices at the Program Level, Champaign: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Filetti, J., Wright, M. and King, W.M. (2010) ‘Grades and ranking: When tenure affects assessment’, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 15 (14): 1–6.
Gappa, J.M., Austin, A.E. and Trice, A.G. (2007) Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education’s Strategic Imperative, San Francisco: Wiley and Sons.
Gasiewski, J.A., Eagan, M.K., Garcia, G.A., Hurtado, S. and Chang, M.J. (2012) ‘From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses’, Research in Higher Education 53 (2): 229–261.
Graves, G.H., Sulewski, C.A., Dye, H.A., Deveans, T.M., Agras, N.M. and Pearson, M. (2009) ‘How are you doing? Effectiveness in teaching mathematics’, PRIMUS 19 (2): 174–193.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Haak, D.C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E. and Freeman, S. (2011) ‘Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology’, Science 332 (6034): 1213–1216.
Hesli, V.L. and Lee, J.M. (2011) ‘Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others?’, PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (2): 393–408.
Hu, S. and McCormick, A.C. (2012) ‘An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes’, Research in Higher Education 53 (7): 738–754.
Hutchings, P. (2010) Opening Doors to Faculty Involvement in Assessment, Champaign: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Jaquette, O. (2013) ‘Why do colleges become universities? Mission drift and the enrollment economy’, Research in Higher Education 54 (5): 514–563.
Kezar, A. (2014) How Colleges Change: Understanding, Leading, and Enacting Change, New York: Routledge.
Kuh, G.D. (2008) High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Kuh, G. and Ikenberry, S. (2009) More Than You Think, Less Than We Need: Learning Outcomes Assessment in American Higher Education, Champaign: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Langbein, L. (2008) ‘Management by results: Student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance’, Economics of Education Review 27 (4): 417–428.
Light, G., Calkins, S., Luna, M. and Drane, M. (2009) ‘Assessing the impact of a year-long faculty development program on faculty approaches to teaching’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20 (2): 168–181.
Lyons, N., Halton, C. and Freidus, H. (2013) ‘Reflective inquiry as transformative self-study for professional education and learning’, Studying Teacher Education 9 (2): 163–174.
Luke, D.A. (2004) Multilevel Modeling, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Nelson Laird, T.F., Garver, A.K. and Niskode-Dossett, A.S. (2011) ‘Gender gaps in collegiate teaching style: Variations by course characteristics’, Research in Higher Education 52 (3): 261–277.
OECD (2012) Fostering Quality Teaching in Higher Education: Policies and Practices, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Papadimitriou, A. (2011) ‘Reforms, leadership, and quality management in Greek higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management 17 (4): 355–372.
Prince, M. (2004) ‘Does active learning work: A review of the research’, Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–231.
Read, W.J., Rama, D.V. and Raghunandan, K. (2001) ‘The relationship between student evaluations of teaching and faculty evaluations’, Journal of Education for Business 76 (4): 189–192.
Reindl, T. and Reyna, R. (2011) From Information to Action: Revamping Higher Education Accountability Systems, Washington DC: National Governors Association.
Rothgeb, J.M. and Burger, B. (2009) ‘Tenure standards in political science departments: Results from a survey of department chairs’, PS: Political Science and Policy 42 (3): 513–519.
Sawyer, K.R., Johnson, J. and Holub, M. (2009) ‘Decline in academe’, International Journal for Educational Integrity 5 (2): 10–28.
Seldin, P. Associates. (eds.) (2006) Evaluating Faculty Performance: A Practical Guide to Assessing Teaching, Research, and Service, Boston: Anker.
Schmitt, E.M., Hu, A.C. and Bachrach, P.S. (2008) ‘Course evaluation and assessment: Examples of a learner-centered approach’, Gerontology and Geriatrics Education 29 (3): 290–300.
Suskie, L. (2009) Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Toth, K.E. and McKey, C.A. (2010) ‘Identifying the potential organizational impact of an educational peer review program’, International Journal for Academic Development 15 (1): 73–83.
Umbach, P.D. (2007) ‘Faculty Cultures and College Teaching’, in R.P. Perry and J.C. Smart (eds.) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective, New York: Springer, pp. 263–317.
US Department of Education (2006) A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education, Washington DC: US Department of Education.
Wainwright, S. (2009) ‘Using self-assessment to assess the effectiveness of learner centered instructional design and delivery’, The Journal of Faculty Development 23 (3): 23–29.
Wolverton, M., Ackerman, R. and Holt, S. (2005) ‘Preparing for leadership: What academic department chairs need to know’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 227–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, C., Myers, S., Stewart, T. et al. Institutional Policies on Assessment of Pedagogy and Faculty Classroom Practices: Evidence from 4-Year Colleges and Universities in the United States. High Educ Policy 28, 315–332 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.13
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.13