Skip to main content
Log in

Research Universities and The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Competition, Resource Concentration, and the ‘Great Recession’ in the United States

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes the US federal government’s response to the ‘Great Recession’ as a ‘natural experiment’ whose broad emphasis on counter-cyclical spending contrasts with the tendency towards stratification within the quasi-market for academic research support. Regression results indicate that resources tended to flow towards a few already-advantaged universities, but also supported universities with lower levels of investment in research equipment and smaller bases of support from business and industry. Because the extent to which these results describe quasi-market mechanisms generally or merely reflect the peculiarities of the US system is unclear, the paper concludes with propositions that could be critiqued and refined through studies in other national contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All financial figures reported in US dollars unless otherwise noted.

References

  • Agasisti, T. and Catalano, G. (2006) ‘Governance models of university systems — Toward quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 28 (3): 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman, J. and Pasricha, G. (2011) ‘The net fiscal expenditure stimulus in the U.S., 2008–2009: Less than what you might think, and less than the fiscal stimuli of most OECD countries’, The Economists’ Voice 8 (2): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berube, A., Bradley, J., Muro, M., Puentes, R., Rahman, S. and Reamer, A. (2009) Metro Potential in ARRA: An Early Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C., Dube, A. and Kaplan, A. (2014) The political economy of discretionary spending: Evidence from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Spring): 375–428.

  • Calero, J. (1998) ‘Quasi-market reforms and equity in the financing of higher education’, European Journal of Education 33 (1): 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2010) Microeconometrics Using Stata, College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2013a) ‘Global status, inter-institutional stratification, and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic Tobit analysis of ARWU position among US universities’, Minerva 51 (2): 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2013b) ‘Internationalisation of the postdoctorate in the United States: Analyzing the demand for international postdoc labor’, Higher Education 66 (5): 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. and Taylor, B.J. (2015) ‘The rise of the postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research’, The Journal of Higher Education 86 (5): 667–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, S., Nicholson-Crotty, S. and Fisher, E.J. (2015) ‘Capacity, guidance, and the implementation of the American recovery and reinvestment act’, Public Administration Review 75 (1): 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2013) ‘Carnegie classifications|standard listings’, http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/lookup_listings/srp.php?clq=%7B%22basic2005_ids%22%3A%2216%22%7Dandstart_page=standard.phpandbackurl=standard.phpandlimit=0,50, accessed 14 November 2013.

  • Dadush, U., Burtless, G., Gros, D., Abberger, K., Taylor, J.B. and Wolverson, R. (2010) Is More Fiscal Stimulus Needed?, Washington DC: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J.A. (2014) ‘Federal stimulus funds under the ARRA did not protect state student financial aid, further eroding higher education affordability’, USAPP: The LSE’s Daily Blog on American Policy and Politics, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/09/11/federal-stimulus-funds-under-the-arra-did-not-protect-state-student-financial-aid-further-eroding-higher-education-affordability/, accessed 4 June 2015.

  • Delaney, J.A. and Doyle, W.R. (2011) ‘State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time’, Journal of Education Finance 36 (4): 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, D.M. and Wellman, J.V. (2011) Trends in College Spending 1999–2009, Washington DC: The Delta Cost Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, J.A. (2010) Higher Education Budgets and the Global Recession, Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R.G., Rizzo, M.J. and Jakubson, G.H. (2007) ‘Who Bears the Growing Cost of Science at Universities?’ in P. Stephan and R.G. Ehrenberg (eds.) Science and The University, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsby, M.W., Hobijn, B. and Sahin, A. (2010) ‘The Labor Market in the Great Recession’, NBER Working Paper #15979, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Gale, W.G. (2010) The Bush Tax Cuts, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennerster, H. (1991) ‘Quasi-markets for education?’ The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1268–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. (2011) State Budgets in Recession and Recovery, Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. (2012) State and Local Budgets and the Great Recession, Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J.C. and Rosinger, K.O. (2014) ‘Socioeconomic diversity in selective private colleges: An organizational analysis’, The Review of Higher Education 38 (1): 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, M.D. and Rohwedder, S. (2010) ‘Effects of the Financial Crisis and Great Recession on American Households’, NBER Working Paper #16407. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Jagannathan, R., Kapoor, M. and Schaumburg, E. (2009) ‘Causes of the Great Recession of 2007–2009’, NBER Working Paper #15404. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Jennings, E.T., Hall, J.L. and Zhang, Z. (2012) ‘The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and state accountability’, Public Performance and Management Review 35 (3): 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. (2009) ‘Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step’, Economics of Education Review 28 (1): 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N., Collins, C. and Singham, A. (2010) State Tax Changes in Response to the Recession, Washington DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, J. (2012) ‘Great Recession and Fiscal Squeeze at U.S. Subnational Government Level’, IMF Working Paper WP/12/184. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

  • Karseth, B. and Solbrekke, T.D. (forthcoming) ‘Curriculum Trends in European Higher Education: The Pursuit of the Humboldtian University Ideas’, in S. Slaughter and B.J. Taylor (eds.) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada. Chapter ten Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Kirby, D. (2011) ‘Strategies for widening access in a quasi-market higher education environment: Recent developments in Canada’, Higher Education 62 (3): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, T.A. (2010) ‘Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, in R. Ahrweiler (ed.) Innovation in Complex Social Systems, New York: Routledge, pp. 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993) Quasi-Markets and Social Policy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L.L., Slaughter, S., Taylor, B.J. and Zhang, L. (2012) ‘How do revenue variations affect expenditures within US research universities?’ Research in Higher Education 53 (6): 614–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, P. (2012) ‘The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case’, Journal of Higher Education 83 (1): 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., Ramirez, F.O., Frank, D.J. and Schofer, E. (2008) ‘Higher Education as an Institution’, in P.J. Gumport (ed.) Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and their Contexts, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 187–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C.C. (2009) ‘Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of US colleges and universities’, The Journal of Higher Education 80 (3): 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J. and Willett, J.B. (2011) Methods Matter: Improving Causal Inference in Educational and Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of College and University Business Officers (2010) 2009 NACUBO-Commonfund Study of Endowments, Washington DC: NACUBO.

  • National Science Board (2014) Science and Technology Indicators, 2013, Arlington, VA: NSF.

  • Orszag, P.R. (2009) ‘Memorandum for the heads of departments and agencies’, http://www.recovery.gov/arra/About/Documents/InitialRecoveryActImplementingGuidance_Feb18.pdf, accessed 2 December 2014.

  • Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (2013a) ‘The Recovery Act’, http://www.recovery.gov/About/Pages/The_Act.aspx, accessed 8 November 2013.

  • Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (2013b) ‘Contract, grant, and loan programs’, http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/fundingoverview/Pages/contractsgrantsloans-details.aspx#ResearchDevelopmentScience, accessed 8 November 2013.

  • Slaughter, S. and Cantwell, B. (2012) ‘Transatlantic moves to the market’, Higher Education 63 (5): 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E.P., Daun-Barnett, N. and Moronski-Chapman, K.M. (2012) Public Policy and Higher Education, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.J. and Cantwell, B. (2015) ‘Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field’, Research in Higher Education 56 (5): 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.J., Cantwell, B. and Slaughter, S. (2013) ‘Quasi-markets in US higher education: The humanities and institutional revenues’, The Journal of Higher Education 84 (5): 675–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R.K. (2001) ‘Trends in Revenues and Expenditures for Public and Private Higher Education’, in M.B. Paulsen and J.C. Smart (eds.) The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B.A., Ballou, J.P. and Asch, E.D. (2008) Mission and Money: Understanding the University, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G.C. (2004) ‘Differentiation among U.S. colleges and universities’, Review of Industrial Organization 24 (4): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (forthcoming) ‘The Imaginators of English University Reform’, in S. Slaughter and B.J. Taylor (eds.) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada. Chapter six Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, B., Cantwell, B. Research Universities and The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Competition, Resource Concentration, and the ‘Great Recession’ in the United States. High Educ Policy 29, 199–217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.21

Keywords

Navigation