Skip to main content
Log in

Reconciling Tensions between Excellence, Access and Equity in Multilateral R&D Partnerships: A Canadian Collaborators’ Perspective

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universities traverse epistemic, sectoral and geopolitical boundaries with increasing frequency, but along the way encounter challenges in mitigating unequal capacities, soaring costs and proprietary concerns. The bridging of disparate stakeholder interests requires an enormous effort, as research policies, institutional norms and organizational cultures in global science often remain irreconcilable. In seeking to identify strategic leverages for optimal balance in cross-border partnerships, this paper considers the case study of the Structural Genomics Consortium, which represents a synergy of resources, interests and commitments by research universities, governments and industries in Canada, Sweden and the UK. By triangulating data derived from content analysis of institutional materials, interviews and participant observations in Toronto, the study zeros in on the Canadian equilibration of symbolic, cultural and organizational forces aimed at securing long-term stakeholder support across institutional, sectoral and geopolitical domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. and Gurney, K. (2010) ‘Funding selectivity, concentration and excellence — How good is the UK’s research?’, Oxford, UK: HEPI, http://www.hepi.ac.uk/files/46%20Funding%20selectivity,%20concentration%20and%20excellence%20full.pdf, accessed 16 May 2013.

  • Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A. and Sapir, A. (2010) ‘The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US’, Economic Policy 25 (61): 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. (2007) ‘Empires of Knowledge and Development’, in P. Altbach and J. Balán (eds.) World Class Worldwide, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. and Balán, J. (2007) World Class Worldwide, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. (2000) The Collaboration Challenge: How Nonprofits and Businesses Succeed through Strategic Alliances, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H. (1993) ‘Criteria and rules for evaluating competing R&D megaprojects’, Science and Public Policy 20 (2): 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Harland, L., Foord, S., Hall, M., Dix, I., Thomas, S., Williams-Jones, B. and Brouwer, C. (2009) ‘Lowering industry firewalls: Pre-competitive informatics initiatives in drug discovery’, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 8 (9): 701–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, E. (2009) ‘Centers of excellence and relevance: The contextualization of global models’, Science, Technology, Society 14 (1): 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhan, A., Singh, J.A., Upshur, R.E.G., Singer, P.A. and Daar, A.S. (2007) ‘Grand challenges in global health: Engaging civil society organizations in biomedical research in developing countries’, PLoS Medicine 4 (9): e272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, C., Gray, D. and Rivers, D. (eds.) (2013) Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. (ed.) (2006) Fixing the Fragmented University: Decentralization with Direction, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K. and Walt, G. (2000) ‘Global public-private partnerships: Part I — A new development in health?’ Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78 (4): 549–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K. and Waxman, A. (2001) ‘Public-private health partnerships: A strategy for WHO’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79 (8): 748–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E.G. and Blumenthal, D. (2000) ‘Academic-industry relationships in biotechnology: A primer on policy and practice’, Cloning 2 (3): 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford: Pergamon Press for the International Association of Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1965) ‘Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition’, American Sociological Review 30 (5): 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, R. (2008) ‘Flat medicine? Exploring trends in the globalization of health care’, Academic Medicine 83 (2): 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, W., Sherwood, L., Salber, P., Scheinberg, D., Slavkin, H., Tilson, H., Reece, E.A., Catanese, V., Johnson, S.B., Dobs, A., Genel, M., Korn, A., Reame, N., Bonow, R., Grebb, J. and Rimoin, D. (2004) ‘Clinical research in the United States at a crossroads: Proposal for a novel public-private partnership to establish a national clinical research enterprise’, Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (9): 1120–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, T., Gentry, R.J. and Bowerman, M. (2011) ‘An integrated agency — Resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending’, Journal of Management Studies 48 (6): 1217–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Man, A.P. and Duysters, G. (2005) ‘Collaboration and innovation: A review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation’, Technovation 25 (12): 1377–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1990) ‘University/industry research collaborations: An analysis of interorganizational relationships’, R&D Management 20 (2): 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The Triple Helix: University-Government-Industry Innovation in Action, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., Weinstein, E., Marincola, E., Rosenbaum, J. and Solomon, F. (2001) ‘Competition and career in biosciences’, Science 294 (5550): 2293–2294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glew, R.H. (2008) ‘Promoting collaborations between biomedical scholars in the US and sub-Saharan Africa’, Experimental Biology and Medicine 233 (3): 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, L.M. and Wesselingh, S. (2002) ‘Management of infectious diseases’, The Medical Journal of Australia 176 (5): 202–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. and Duysters, G. (2007) ‘Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process’, Journal of Management Studies 44 (1): 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) ‘Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research’, Science 280 (5364): 698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J.R. and Hollingsworth, E.J. (2000) ‘Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspective on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structures, and Culture’, in P. Weingart and N. Stehr (eds.) Practising Interdisciplinarity, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 215–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J.R., Hollingsworth, E.J. and Hage, J. (eds.) (2002) The Search for Excellence: Organizations, Institutions, and Major Discoveries in Biomedical Science, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D. (2009) ‘The way biomedical research is organized has dramatically changed over the past half-century: Are the changes for the better?’ Neuron 64 (2): 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. (2008) International Collaboration and the Effects of Rankings, Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C.T. (2010) ‘Public-private partnerships as an effective procurement system for mega projects in Singapore’, Ph.D. dissertation, Heriot-Watt University.

  • Johnston, R. (1994) ‘Effects of resource concentration on resource performance’, Higher Education 28 (1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., Wuchty, S. and Uzzi, B. (2008) ‘Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography and stratification in science’, Science 322 (5905): 1259–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.A. and Oleksiyenko, A. (2011) ‘The internationalization of Canadian university research: A global higher education matrix analysis of multi-level governance’, Higher Education 61 (1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J. and Salerno, C. (2008) ‘Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda’, Higher Education 56 (3): 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, D.G. (2008) ‘A principled partnership between academic medicine and industry’, Medscape Journal of Medicine 10 (8): 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (2003) Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronick, R., Goodman, D., Wennberg, J. and Wagner, E. (1993) ‘The marketplace in health care reform — The demographic limitations of managed competition’, New England Journal of Medicine 328 (2): 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. and Butler, N. (2006) The Future of European Universities: Renaissance or Decay? London: Center for European Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D.W. (2001) ‘A Primer on Responsibility Centre Budgeting and Responsibility Centre Management’, in J.L. Yeager, G.M. Nelson, E.A. Potter, J.C. Weidman and T.G. Zullo (eds.) ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education, 2nd edn., Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing, pp. 568–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansang, M. and Crawley, F. (2000) ‘The ethics of international biomedical research (editorial)’, British Medical Journal 321 (7264): 777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (2004) ‘Bioengineering research partnerships: A new program to encourage multidisciplinary biomedical research from the NINDS and NIH’, Neurosurgery 55 (3): N7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. and Rhoades, G. (2002) ‘Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic’, Higher Education 43 (3): 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006) ‘Dynamics of national and global competition’, Higher Education 52 (1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007) ‘The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision’, Higher Education 53 (3): 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.B. (2002) ‘Academic-industrial collaboration: The good, the bad, and the ugly’, Transactions of the America Clinical and Climatological Association 113, 227–240, discussion 239–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2002) The Responsibility Virus: How Control Freaks, Shrinking Violets — And the Rest of Us — Can Harness the Power of True Partnership, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, A.J. and Beaglehole, R. (2000) ‘The changing global context of public health’, The Lancet 356 (9228): 495–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1988) ‘The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property’, Isis 79 (4): 606–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Goussevskaia, A., Swan, J., Bresnen, M. and Obembe, A. (2008) ‘Interdependencies in complex project ecologies: The case of biomedical innovation’, Long Range Planning 41 (1): 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwaka, S. (2005) ‘Drug discovery and beyond: The role of public-private partnerships in improving access to new malaria medicines’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 99 (Supplement 1): S20–S29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2008) ‘Global portfolios and strategic international partnerships of a major research university’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2010) University-Industry Biomedical Partnerships: A Multilevel Stakeholder Management Approach. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Conference of the Association of Southeast Asian Institutions of Higher Learning (ASAIHL) entitled ‘Higher Education: Engaging the Knowledge Economy; 16–18 April, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2013) ‘Organizational legitimacy of international research collaborations: Crossing boundaries in the Middle East’, Minerva 51 (1): 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and Hess, C. (eds.) (2007) ‘A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons’, in Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, G. and Kang, J. (2013) ‘Alliance addiction: Do alliances create real benefits?’ Creativity and Innovation Management 22 (1): 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perorazio, T.E. (2009) ‘Curiosity and commercialization: Faculty perspectives on sponsored research, academic sciences and research agendas’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J.B. (2004) ‘R&D funding sources and university technology transfer: What is stimulating universities to be more entrepreneurial?’ Research in Higher Education 45 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, M. (ed.) (2002) Public-Private Partnerships for Public Health, Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá, C. and Oleksiyenko, A. (2011) ‘Between the local and the global: Organized research units and international collaborations in the health sciences’, Higher Education 62 (3): 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M. (1997) ‘Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (S1): 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salicrup, L.A. and Rohrbaugh, M.L. (2005) ‘Partnerships in technology transfer. An innovative program to enhance biomedical research and global health’, International Microbiology 8 (1): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleyer, T.K., Teasley, S.D. and Bhatnagar, R. (2005) ‘Comparative case study of two biomedical research collaboratories’, Journal of Medical Internet Research 7 (5): e53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. (2000) ‘From cooperation to competition in national health systems — And back?: Impact on professional ethics and quality of care’, International Journal of Health Planning and Management 15 (1): 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SGC — Structural Genomics Consortium (2013) ‘About SGC Toronto’, http://thesgc.org/scientists/groups/toronto, accessed 16 October 2013.

  • Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiffer, R. (2006) ‘Academic freedom and academic-industry relationships in biotechnology’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Society (2011) Knowledge, Networks, and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century, London: The Royal Society.

  • UToronto Magazine (2003) ‘Speeding toward discovery’, UToronto Magazine 1 (2): 3.

  • van den Besselaar, P., Hemlin, S. and van der Weijden, I. (2012) ‘Collaboration and competition in research’, Higher Education Policy 25 (3): 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, W., Hol, W., Myler, P. and Stewart, L. (2009) ‘The role of medical structural genomics in discovering new drugs for infectious diseases’, PLoS Computational Biology 5 (10): e1000530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, D. (2003) ‘Problems for biomedical research at the academia-industrial interface’, Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1): 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, J. (2009) ‘The case for open-access chemical biology: A strategy for pre-competitive medicinal chemistry to promote drug discovery’, EMBO Reports 10 (9): 941–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellcome Trust (2003) ‘Structural Genomics Consortium launches’, http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD003984.html, accessed 25 January 2006.

  • Wright, M.T., Gardner, B., Roche, B., von Unger, H. and Ainlay, C. (2010) ‘Building an international collaboration on participatory health research’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 4 (1): 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the editor of this journal and two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive advice on refining some analytical perspectives. All shortcomings, however, should be attributed to this author only.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oleksiyenko, A. Reconciling Tensions between Excellence, Access and Equity in Multilateral R&D Partnerships: A Canadian Collaborators’ Perspective. High Educ Policy 28, 197–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.5

Keywords

Navigation