Skip to main content
Log in

New era for the consumer health informatics research agenda

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Health Systems

Abstract

Advances in information technology have signified a shift from institution-centric systems to patient- or consumer-centric ones that support not only disease management but also wellness promotion. These trends are a catalyst for the growth of Consumer Health Informatics (CHI), a sub-domain of biomedical and health informatics that focuses on understanding consumer preferences and information needs in the health care context, and on designing and implementing tools and systems to meet these needs. One of the promising CHI applications is the personal health record (PHR). Several challenges such as the effective interoperability between personal health records and electronic medical record systems, the barriers of the digital divide, various levels of health literacy and access to care, need to be carefully examined in the context of designing, implementing and evaluating PHR systems. Ethical, legal and practical implications of innovative technologies such as wearable sensors and other home-based monitoring technologies also require an in-depth analysis of unintended consequences. This position paper outlines opportunities for CHI researchers to further the evidence base in this ever growing domain of health informatics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eysenbach G (2000) Consumer health informatics. BMJ 320 (7251), 1713–1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz K, Marcus Lewis F and Rimer BK (1997) Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. National Institute of HealthWashington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JA, Mullen PD and Green LW (1992) A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Education Research 7 (1), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2012) Committee on Living Well with Chronic Disease: Public Action to Reduce Disability Improve Functioning Quality of Life. Living Well with Chronic Illness: A Call for Public Health Action. The National Academies Press.

  • Janz NK and Becker MH (1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Education Quarterly 11 (1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn JS, Aulakh V and Bosworth A (2009) What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Affairs 28 (2), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Alliance for Health Information Technology (2008) Defining key health information technology terms. 28 April, [WWW document] http://healthit.hhs.gov/defining_key_hit_terms (accessed 15 February 2012).

  • Rosenstock IM (1966) Why people use health services. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 44 (3), 94–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS and Bates DW (2011) The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Archives of Internal Medicine 171 (26), 568–574.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demiris, G. New era for the consumer health informatics research agenda. Health Syst 1, 13–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2012.7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2012.7

Keywords

Navigation