Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary evidence for the use and efficacy of mobile health applications in managing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Systems

Abstract

Mobile health applications like PTSD Coach are emerging as tools to help individuals manage post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. However, these applications will not be effective if people do not use them. Using PTSD Coach as the focal application, we address two interrelated questions: (1) what are the primary determinants of PTSD Coach use? and (2) is PTSD Coach use related to changes in PTSD symptomatology? Building on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, we develop and test a research model that addresses these questions. Our results show that performance expectancy and social influence are positively related to PTSD Coach use; however, effort expectancy and facilitating conditions are not related to PTSD Coach use. We also found that PTSD Coach use is positively related to improvements in PTSD symptomatology. Our results provide preliminary evidence for the use and efficacy of mobile health applications in managing PTSD symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See http://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/pages/PTSDCoach.asp for more information about PTSD Coach.

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson G and Cuijpers P (2009) Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 38(4), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Baird A, Raghu TS, North F and Edwards F (2014) When traditionally inseparable services are separated by technology: the case of patient portal features offered by primary care providers. Health Systems 3(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zeev D, Kaiser SM, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J and Mohr DC (2013) Development and usability testing of FOCUS: a smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 36(4), 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25(3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush NE, Ouellette G and Kinn J (2014) Utility of the T2 mood tracker mobile application among army warrior transition unit service members. Military Medicine 179(12), 1453–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson EB (2001) Psychometric study of a brief screen for PTSD: Assessing the impact of multiple traumatic events. Assessment 8(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung GW and Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AA and Owens GP (2012) Attachment, personality characteristics, and posttraumatic stress disorder in U.S. veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Journal of Traumatic Stress 25(6), 657–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP and Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor D, Ormrod RK and Turne HA (2007) Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect 31(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M and Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frueh BC, Monnier J, Yim E, Grubaugh AL, Hamner MB and Knapp RG (2007) A randomized study of telepsychiatry for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 13(3), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould RA, Otto MW and Pollack MH (1995) A meta-analysis of treatment outcome for panic disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 15(8), 819–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray MJ, Litz BT, Hsu JL and Lombardo TW (2004) Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment 11(4), 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey A, Bryant R and Tarrier N (2003) Cognitive behaviour therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 23(3), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai M and Clum GA (2005) An Internet-based self-change program for traumatic event related fear, distress, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Traumatic Stress 18(6), 631–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M and Nelson CB (1995) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry 52(12), 1048–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King WR and He J (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6), 740–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn E et al (2014) Preliminary evaluation of PTSD Coach, a smartphone app for post-traumatic stress symptoms. Military Medicine 179(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz BT, Engel CC, Bryant RA and Papa A (2007) A randomized, controlled proof-of-concept trial of an internet-based, therapist-assisted self-management treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 1676–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz BT, Williams L, Wang J, Bryant R and Engel CC (2004) A therapist-assisted internet self-help program for traumatic stress. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice 35(6), 628–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxton DD, Hansen RN and Stanfill K (2014) Mobile app self-care versus in-office care for stress reduction: a cost minimization analysis. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 20(8), 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meis LA, Erbes CR, Polusny MA and Compton JS (2010) Intimate relationships among returning soldiers: the mediating and moderating roles of negative emotionality, PTSD symptoms, and alcohol problems. Journal of Traumatic Stress 23(5), 564–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GC and Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul RJ, Ezz I and Kuljis J (2012) Healthcare information systems: a patient-user perspective. Health Systems 1(2), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y and Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero KJ, Resnick HS, Acierno R, Coffey SF, Carpenter MJ and Ruscio AMS (2006) Internet-based intervention for mental health and substance use problems in disaster-affected populations: a pilot feasibility study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 37(2), 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch N, Angermeyer MC and Corrigan PW (2005) Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry 20(8), 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer NA, Spoont M, Murdoch M, Parker LE, Hintz S and Rosenheck R (2011) A qualitative study of U.S. Veterans’ reasons for seeking department of veterans affairs disability benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress 24(6), 699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RL, Higgins CA and Howell JM (1991) Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly 15(1), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1971) Attitude and Attitude Change. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuerk PW, Yoder M, Ruggiero KJ, Gros DF and Acierno R (2010) A pilot study of prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder delivered via telehealth technology. Journal of Traumatic Stress 23(1), 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V and Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2), 273–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V and Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB and Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA and Keane TM (1993) The PTSD Checklist: Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX.

  • Weeger A and Gewald H (2015) Acceptance and use of electronic medical records: an exploratory study of hospital physicians’ salient beliefs about HIT systems. Health Systems 4(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for financial support from the Office of Sponsored Awards and Research Support at University of South Carolina Upstate. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Roberts.

Appendix

Appendix

Survey items

Performance Expectancy (Venkatesh et al, 2003)

  1. 1

    Using PTSD Coach will enable me to learn about PTSD.

  2. 2

    Using PTSD Coach will help me manage my PTSD symptoms.

  3. 3

    Using PSTD Coach will help me assess my level of PTSD.

  4. 4

    Using PTSD Coach will help me maintain a support network.

  5. 5

    Using PTSD Coach will enhance my quality of life.

(1=Strongly Disagree, 7=Strongly Agree)

Effort Expectancy (Venkatesh et al, 2003)

  1. 1

    Learning to operate PTSD Coach would be easy for me.

  2. 2

    My interaction with PTSD Coach would be clear and understandable.

  3. 3

    It would be easy for me to become skillful at using PTSD Coach.

  4. 4

    I would find PTSD Coach easy to use.

(1=Strongly Disagree, 7=Strongly Agree)

Social Influence (Venkatesh et al, 2003)

  1. 1

    My family thinks that I should use PTSD Coach.

  2. 2

    My friends think that I should use PTSD Coach.

  3. 3

    My colleagues think that I should use PTSD Coach.

(1=Strongly Disagree, 7=Strongly Agree)

Facilitating Conditions (Venkatesh et al, 2003)

  1. 1

    I have the resources necessary to use PTSD Coach.

  2. 2

    I have the knowledge necessary to use PTSD Coach.

  3. 3

    I have the support necessary to use PTSD Coach.

(1=Strongly Disagree, 7=Strongly Agree)

PTSD Coach Use (Bhattacherjee, 2001)

Please think about your use of PTSD Coach in the past 4 months when evaluating these statements.

  1. 1

    I have carried on using PTSD Coach.

  2. 2

    I have continued to use PTSD Coach.

  3. 3

    I have kept on using PTSD Coach.

(1=Not at all true, 7=Absolutely true)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keen, S., Roberts, N. Preliminary evidence for the use and efficacy of mobile health applications in managing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Health Syst 6, 122–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2016.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2016.2

Keywords

Navigation