Skip to main content
Log in

Building the capacity of business associations in developing countries to influence public policy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Interest Groups & Advocacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supporting business associations in developing countries to influence public policy is increasingly seen by development partners as an important contributor to improving the business enabling environment and, as a consequence, to improving the vibrancy of the private sector leading, in turn, to more job creation and greater poverty alleviation. This approach requires that business associations are supported to build their capacity and engage in dialogue and advocacy. Initiatives to do this are being funded, inter alia, in Kenya, Tanzania and Ghana. Evaluation of these programmes requires that there is a means of assessing both whether business association competence has improved and whether higher levels of competence are associated with business association ability to influence policy. This article describes a diagnostic tool which is being used to assess the competence of business associations and explores whether they have become more successful as their competence has improved. While it cannot offer a full picture – participation in training does not mean that organisations become expert and success in influencing public policy is dependent on more than competence – the evidence suggests that business associations do raise their competence and that raised competence does lead to greater success in influencing public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first phase was funded by DANIDA, DFID and USAID; the second by DANIDA and the EU

  2. with funding from DANIDA, Swedish International Development Agency, DFID and the Royal Netherlands Embassy

  3. with funding from DANIDA

  4. also with funding from DANIDA

References

  • Chapman, J. and Fisher, T. (1999) The Thoughtful Activist: A Toolkit for Enhancing NGO Campaigning and Advocacy. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. and Warneyo, A. (2001) Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy: A Scoping Study. London: Action Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPE (2003) How to Advocate Effectively: A Guidebook for Business Associations. Washington DC: Center for International Private Enterprise.

  • Coates, B. and David, R. (2002) Learning for change: The art of assessing the impact of advocacy work. Development in Practice 12 (3–4): 530–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Industries (undated) Diagnostic Tool for Assessment of Business Associations in Developing Countries. Copenhagen: Danish Industries.

  • Davies, R. (2001) Evaluating the Effectiveness of DFID’s Influence with Multinationals. Part A: A Review of NGO Approaches to the Evaluation of Advocacy Work. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., McLeish, C. and Ramalho, R.M. (2006) Regulation and growth. Economics Letters 92 (3): 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R. (2007) Institutional contexts, organisational resources and strategic choices, exploring interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics 8 (3): 329–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, K., Louie, J., David, T. and Crystal Foster, C. (2005) The Challenge of Assessing Policy and Advocacy Activities: Strategies for a Prospective Evaluation Approach. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, K., Louie, J., David, T. and Crystal Foster, C. (2006) The Challenge of Assessing Policy and Advocacy Activities: Part Two – Moving from Theory to Practice. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helboe Pedersen, H. (2013) Is measuring interest group influence a mission impossible? The case of interest group influence in the Danish parliament. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (1): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, D. (2002) Implementing an indicator: Operationalising USAID’s advocacy index in Zimbabwe. Development in Practice 12 (1): 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. and Githinji, M. (forthcoming) Business associations in Kenya: The success factors. Journal of Public Affairs.

  • Irwin, D., Jackson, A. and Hawley, P. (2012) Advocacy for Business Associations. Northumberland: Irwin Grayson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. and Ridley, J. (2006) BEST-AC Mid-term Review: Report Prepared for BEST-AC, Tanzania. Northumberland: Irwin Grayson Associates.

  • Jackson, A. and Irwin, D. (2007) Advocacy Capacity Building Evaluation Tool: Background Note. Northumberland: Irwin Grayson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, D. (2013) Lobbying influence: Meaning, measurement and missing. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2008) Supporting Business Environment Reforms: Practical Guidance for Development Agencies. Cambridge: Donor Committee for Enterprise Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth. Washington DC: World Bank, IFC and Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Conor McGrath and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback, advice and support in preparing this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irwin, D. Building the capacity of business associations in developing countries to influence public policy. Int Groups Adv 4, 185–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.21

Keywords

Navigation