Skip to main content
Log in

The New Economics of Prudential Capital Controls: A Research Agenda

  • Published:
IMF Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an introduction to the new economics of prudential capital controls in emerging economies. This literature is based on the notion that there are externalities associated with financial crises because individual market participants do not internalize their contribution to aggregate financial instability. We describe financial crises as situations in which an emerging economy loses access to international financial markets and experiences a feedback loop in which declining aggregate demand, falling exchange rates and asset prices, and deteriorating balance sheets mutually reinforce each other—a common phenomenon in recent emerging market crises. Individual market participants take aggregate prices and financial conditions as given and do not internalize their contribution to financial instability when they choose their actions. As a result they impose externalities in the form of greater financial instability on each other, and the private financing decisions of individuals are distorted toward excessive risk-taking. Prudential capital controls can induce private agents to internalize their externalities and thereby increase macroeconomic stability and enhance welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example, from 2009 to 2011, the countries that have imposed new regulations or extended existing prudential regulations on capital inflows include Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Peru. See Ostry and others (2011).

  2. The literature employs several different terms for this basic mechanism, including debt deflation, Fisherian deflation, or financial accelerator.

  3. See, for example, the description of the transfer problem in the open economy by Keynes (1929) and of debt deflation in the closed economy by Fisher (1933).

  4. More generally, we could distinguish between the fraction κ T of tradable goods and κ N of nontradable goods that lenders can seize. As long as both are positive, our results would continue to hold.

  5. There is an instructive analogy to asset markets: a lender who lends to an airline company that uses planes as a collateral has no intrinsic use for planes. In the event of default the lender seizes the planes and sells them to other airlines against cash.

  6. In models of financial amplification in which the borrowing constraint depends on future prices, it is necessary to introduce investment as a link between the current period and the future. Amplification arises when borrowing constraints at time t become binding, which reduce investment at time t and lower income and prices at time t+1, which in turn reduces borrowing at time t further, and so on.

  7. However, Kocherlakota (2000) and Cordoba and Ripoll (2004) caution that the constraint specification of Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) does not yield quantitatively large amplification effects in calibrated models.

  8. We include yT, 1 as a separate argument to the function V(·) since it shows up not only in the budget constraint (where it is captured by the variable m) but also in the borrowing constraint.

  9. An additional technical condition is that the preferences of all agents need to be locally nonsatiated.

  10. There are several special circumstances, however, when equilibrium is constrained efficient even if markets are incomplete. These include economies with a single good (because there are no relative prices that could trigger pecuniary externalities) and economies with a single or representative agent (because there is no trade in such an economy). For a detailed discussion, see Arnott, Greenwald, and Stiglitz (1992).

  11. See Hart (1975), Stiglitz (1982), Geanakoplos and Polemarchakis (1986) and Greenwald and Stiglitz (1986) for a discussion of the inefficiency of the decentralized equilibrium in economies with incomplete markets at a technical level. Arnott, Greenwald, and Stiglitz (1992) provide an excellent intuitive description.

  12. Even if some market participants have some market power, they will not fully internalize the social costs of the pecuniary externalities that result from their actions. For example, in a duopoly, each player would find it optimal to internalize only 50 percent of the pecuniary externalities.

  13. This formulation of a constrained planning problem, in which the planner has no other instruments than the decentralized market, is the most basic criterion for Pareto inefficiency. If we give the planner additional instruments, it is natural that she can improve the equilibrium further. See for example the section ‘Prudential Capital Controls vs. Ex-Post Intervention’ for a discussion of how a planner would use mitigating policy measures once a crisis has occurred.

  14. However, even if prudential taxes are not employed in some time periods, the equilibrium in a multiperiod general equilibrium model will still be affected by the expectation of future intervention.

  15. Risk-averse international investors are an important aspect of our model; otherwise domestic consumers could costlessly insure against domestic shocks.

  16. More generally, we could assume that a fraction of the long-term debt has to be rolled over in period 1 and that this fraction enters the borrowing constraint. Our basic results would be unaffected.

  17. However, Korinek (2010b) cautions that the opportunity cost of holding reserves in the current economic environment with low global interest rates are close to zero and fluctuate strongly with small changes in global interest rates, making the policy instrument less reliable.

References

  • Aghion, P., P. Bacchetta, and A. Banerjee, 2000, “A Simple Model of Monetary Policy and Currency Crises,” European Economic Review, Vol. 44, No. 4–6, pp. 728–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., P. Bacchetta, and A. Banerjee, 2001, “Currency Crises and Monetary Policy in an Economy with Credit Constraints,” European Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 1121–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman, J., 2011, “Hoarding International Reserves Versus a Pigovian Tax-Cum-Subsidy Scheme,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1502–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R.J., B.C. Greenwald, and J.E. Stiglitz, 1992, “Information and Economic Efficiency,” Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., and J.E. Stiglitz, 1980, Lectures on Public Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengui, J., 2011a, “Macro-Prudential Policy Coordination and Global Regulatory Spillovers,” University of Maryland, manuscript.

  • Bengui, J., 2011b, “Systemic Risk and Inefficient Debt Maturity,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Benigno, G., others 2010, “Financial Crises and Macro-Prudential Policies,” (mimeo, University of Virginia).

  • Benigno, G, others 2011, “Revisiting Overborrowing and its Policy Implications,” in Monetary Policy Under Financial Turbulence, ed. by L.F. Céspedes, R. Chang, and D. Saravia (Santiago, Chile: Central Bank of Chile), pp. 145–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, E., and N.K. Bergman, 2011, “Bankruptcy and the Collateral Channel,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 337–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., and M. Gertler, 1989, “Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations,” American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., and D. Gale, 1987, “Preference Shocks, Liquidity and Central Bank Policy,” in New Approaches to Monetary Economics, ed. by W.A. Barnett and K.J. Singleton (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 69–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, J., 2011, “Overborrowing and Systemic Externalities in the Business Cycle,” American Economic Review, forthcoming.

  • Bianchi, J., and E.G. Mendoza, 2011, “Overborrowing, Financial Crises and Macroprudential Policy,” University of Maryland, manuscript.

  • Borio, C., 2011, “Rediscovering the Macroeconomic Roots of Financial Stability Policy: Challenges and a Way Forward,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, forthcoming.

  • Burnside, C., M. Eichenbaum, and S. Rebelo, 2001, “Prospective Deficits and the Asian Currency Crisis,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 109, No. 6, pp. 1155–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, C., M. Eichenbaum, and S. Rebelo, 2008, “Currency Crisis Models,” in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. by S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., and A. Krishnamurthy, 2001, “International and Domestic Collateral Constraints in a Model of EmergingMarket Crises,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 513–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., and A. Krishnamurthy, 2003, “Excessive Dollar Debt: Financial Development and Underinsurance,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 867–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., and A. Krishnamurthy, 2004, “Smoothing Sudden Stops,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 104–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., and G. Lorenzoni, 2009, “Peristent Appreciations and Overshooting: A Normative Analysis,” (mimeo, MIT).

  • Carlstrom, C., and T.S. Fuerst, 1997, “Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis,” American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, pp. 893–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Céspedes, L.F., R. Chang, and A. Velasco, 2011, “Exchange Market Intervention as Unconventional Monetary Policy,” manuscript.

  • Chetty, R., 2009, “Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods,” Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 451–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba, J.-C., and M. Ripoll, 2004, “Credit Cycles Redux,” International Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 1011–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahri, E, and J. Tirole, 2011, “Collective Moral Hazard, Maturity Mismatch, and Systemic Bailouts,” American Economic Review, forthcoming.

  • Fisher, I., 1933, “The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions,” Econometrica, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.P., and P.M. Garber, 1984, “Collapsing Exchange Rate Regimes: Some Linear Examples,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 17, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K.J., 2005, “The Microeconomic Evidence on Capital Controls: No Free Lunch,” NBER Working Paper 11372.

  • Frankel, J.A., 2005, “Contractionary Currency Crashes in Developing Countries,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 149–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., 1953, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” in Essays in Positive Economics, ed. by M. Friedman (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 157–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J.D., and H.M. Polemarchakis, 1986, “Existence, Regularity, and Constrained Suboptimality of Competitive Allocations When the Asset Market is Incomplete,” Cowles Foundation Paper, 652.

  • Gertler, M., S. Gilchrist, and F.M. Natalucci, 2007, “External Constraints on Monetary Policy and the Financial Accelerator,” Journal of Money Credit and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 2–3, pp. 295–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B.C., and J.E. Stiglitz, 1986, “Externalities in Economies with Imperfect Information and Incomplete Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 90 (May), pp. 229–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., 1975, “On the Optimality of Equilibrium When the Market Structure is Incomplete,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 11, pp. 418–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin, C.J., 1987, “Demand Deposits, Trading Restrictions and Risk Sharing,” in Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade, ed. by E.C. Prescott and N. Wallace (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, O., and A. Korinek, 2010a, “Excessive Volatility in Capital Flows: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach,” American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, O., and A. Korinek, 2010b, “Managing Credit Booms and Busts: A Pigouvian Taxation Approach,” NBER Working Paper, w16377.

  • Jeanne, O., and A. Korinek, 2011a, “Booms, Busts and Growth,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Jeanne, O., and A. Korinek, 2011b, “Macroprudential Regulation Versus Mopping up After the Crash,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Jeanne, O., and A. Korinek, 2011c, “Pecuniary Externalities and Second-Best Interventions,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Jeanne, O., A. Subramanian, and J. Williamson, 2012, Who Needs to Open the Capital Account? (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M., 1929, “The German Transfer Problem,” Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki, N., and J. Moore, 1997, “Credit Cycles,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N., 2000, “Creating Business Cycles Through Credit Constraints,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Vol. 24, pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, A., 2007, “Dollar Borrowing in Emerging Markets,” (Dissertation; New York: Columbia University).

  • Korinek, A., 2009, “Excessive Dollar Borrowing in Emerging Markets: Balance Sheet Effects and Macroeconomic Externalities,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Korinek, A., 2010a, “Regulating Capital Flows to Emerging Markets: An Externality View,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Korinek, A., 2010b, “Regulating Capital Flows to Emerging Markets: Design and Implementation Issues,” University of Maryland, manuscript.

  • Korinek, A., 2011a, “Capital Controls and Currency Wars,” (mimeo, University of Maryland).

  • Korinek, A., 2011b, “Hot Money and Serial Financial Crises,” IMF Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 306–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, A., and L. Serven, 2010, “Undervaluation Through Foreign Reserve Accumulation: Static Losses, Dynamic Gains,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5250.

  • Krugman, P.R., 1979, “A Model of Balance-of-Payments Crises,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R., 1999, “Balance Sheets, the Transfer Problem, and Financial Crises,” in International Finance and Financial Crises: Essays in Honor of Robert P. Flood Jr, ed. by P. Isard, A. Razin, and A.K. Rose (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund), pp. 31–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R., 2001, “Analytical Afterthoughts on the Asian Crisis” in Economy Theory, Dynamics and Markets. Essay in Honour of Ryuzo Sato, ed. by T. Negishi, R.V. Ramachandran and K. Mino (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

  • Laffont, J.-J., 1987, “Externalities,” in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., 2008, “Inefficient Credit Booms,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 809–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magud, N., C.M. Reinhart, and K. Rogoff, 2011, “Capital Controls: Myth and Reality—A Portfolio Balance Approach,” NBER Working Paper, w16805.

  • Mauro, P., others 2007, “Reaping the Benefits of Financial Globalization,” IMF Discussion Paper.

  • McKinnon, R.I., and H. Pill, 1998, “International Overborrowing: A Decomposition of Credit and Currency Risks,” World Development, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1267–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E.G., 2002, “Credit, Prices, and Crashes: Business Cycles with a Sudden Stop,” in Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets, ed. by S. Edwards and J.A. Frankel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E.G., 2010, “Sudden Stops, Financial Crises and Leverage,” American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 1941–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, C.J., 1999, “An Introduction to Capital Controls,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, November/December, pp. 13–30.

  • Nikolov, K., 2011, “Is Private Leverage Excessive?,” (mimeo, European Central Bank).

  • Obstfeld, M., 1994, “The Logic of Currency Crises,” Cahiers Economiques et Monetaires, Banque de France, Vol. 43, pp. 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., and A.M. Taylor, 2003, “Globalization and Capital Markets,” in Globalization in Historical Perspective, ed. by M.D. Bordo, A.M. Taylor, and J.G. Williamson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 121–190.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J.D., and others 2011, “Managing Capital Inflows: What Tools to Use?,” IMF Staff Discussion Note 11-06.

  • Perotti, E., and J. Suarez, 2011, “A Pigovian Approach to Liquidity Regulation,” International Journal of Central Banking, forthcoming.

  • Reinhart, C.M., and K.S. Rogoff, 2009, This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., and A. Tornell, 2004, “Balance Sheet Effects, Bailout Guarantees and Financial Crises,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 883–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, A., 2011, “Reserve Accumulation and Financial Risk: From Individual Protection to Systemic Risk,” (mimeo, University of Osnabrueck).

  • Stiglitz, J.E., 1982, “The Inefficiency of the Stock Market Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J., 2003, “Inefficient Foreign Borrowing: A Dual- and Common-Agency Perspective,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 5, pp. 1678–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J., 1978, “A Proposal for International Monetary Reform,” Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3–4, pp. 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R.M., 1979, “Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Végh, C., 2012, Open Economy Macroeconomics in Developing Countries (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L., 1974, “Prices vs. quantities,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

*Anton Korinek is an assistant professor of economics at the University of Maryland. The author would like to thank Julien Bengui, Maya Eden, Martin Evans, Giovanni Favara, Rex Ghosh, Olivier Jeanne, Nicolas Magud, Ha Nguyen, Krisztina Orban, Jonathan Ostry, Roberto Piazza, Carmen Reinhart and Joseph Stiglitz as well as participants of the Inaugural Conference of the Institute for New Economic Thinking and the 2011 IEA Meetings and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. The author would also like to acknowledge Carmen Reinhart for sharing data on the relationship between financial liberalization and instability. Work on this project was undertaken while the author was a visiting scholar at the IMF. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the IMF. The title of this paper is inspired by the description of the emerging “new theory of prudential capital controls” by Jeanne, Subramanian, and Williamson (2012).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korinek, A. The New Economics of Prudential Capital Controls: A Research Agenda. IMF Econ Rev 59, 523–561 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.19

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.19

Keywords

Navigation