Abstract
This article considers Patricia Owens' Between War and Politics in the light of its important critique of political moralism. For Owens, following Arendt, the instrumental use of violence in the political domain is dangerous if it serves abstract ends. The moral ’wars’ of neo-conservatism and humanitarian interventionism embody this danger. I argue that this conflation of neo-conservative foreign policy and progressive liberalism is misguided, it underestimates the latter's increasing mediations between norm, legality and power. A critique of present moralization of politics should emphasize codification of rights to delimit the procedural framework within which international intervention can be made legitimate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1966) The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York: Harcourt Inc.
Arendt, H. (1972) Crises of the Republic, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.
Arendt, H. (2006) On Revolution, New York: Penguin, (1963 1st edn.).
Habermas, J. (1998) ‘Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Year's Hindsight’, in J. Bohman and M. Lutz-Bachmann (eds.) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (with J. Derrida) (2003) ‘Open Letter on Iraq War’, Frankfurte Allgemein Zeitung, May 1.
Habermas, J. (2006) The Divided West, Kiaran Kronin (trans.), Cambridge: Polity.
Held, D. (2005) ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’, in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beardsworth, R. Arendt and the Critique of Moralism. Int Polit 45, 506–513 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.16
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.16