Original Article
International Politics (2009) 46, 157–176. doi:10.1057/ip.2008.42
Is the Bush Revolution over?
Steven Hurst1
1Department of Politics & Philosophy, Geoffrey Manton Building, Rosamond Street West, off Oxford Road, Manchester M15 6LL, UK. E-mail: s.hurst@mmu.ac.uk
Abstract
Several observers have argued that the radical transformation of American foreign policy wrought by George W. Bush is already over. They argue that the 'Bush Revolution' was merely a result of the short-term conjuncture of neoconservative influence and the impact of September 11, 2001, and that this temporary deviation has been ended by the American failure in Iraq. Yet the causes of the Bush Revolution are more fundamental and long-term than this argument implies. It is in the combination of the shift to a militarily unipolar international system and the dominance of the Republican Party by its conservative wing that the real roots of the Bush foreign policy lie, and neither condition is likely to alter in the foreseeable future. Moreover, although the Iraq War has led to some shifts in policy, the Republicans' selection of John McCain as their presidential candidate confirms the continued vitality of the Bush Revolution.
Keywords:
unilateralism, neoconservatives, conservatives, unipolarity, Iraq, Iran
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by Palgrave Macmillan are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Is the Bush Revolution over?International Politics Original Article
Foreign policy fusion: Liberal interventionists, conservative nationalists and neoconservatives ? the new alliance dominating the US foreign policy establishmentInternational Politics Original Article
Persistent primacy and the future of the American eraInternational Politics Original Article
Neoconservative democratization in theory and practice: Developing democrats or raising radical Islamists?International Politics Original Article
See all 30 matches for Research


